102 Cf. 2 Cor. 8:9; Phil. 2:6-7.
100Cf. T. W. Manson, “The Son of Man in Daniel, Enoch and the Gospels” (1950), in Studies in the Gospels and Epistles, ed. M. Black (Manchester, 1962), pp. 123-45; M. D. Hooker, The Son of Man in Mark (London, 1967), pp. 33-48; P. M. Casey, The Son of Man (London, 1979), pp. 99-112.
101 “The heavenly Messiah of the apocalypses is a lifeless figure, clothed in unapproachable light. The risen Christ of Paul, on the other hand, is a person whom a man can love; indeed He is a person whom as a matter of fact Paul did love” (J. G. Machen, The Origin of Paul’s Religion [New York, 1921], pp. 194-95).
102Cf. 2 Cor. 8:9; Phil. 2:6-7.
103A. M. Hunter, Interpreting Paul’s Gospel (London, 1954), p. 60.
104 “The Messiah of the apocalypses . . . is not thought of as being associated with God in the creation of the world” (Machen, Origin, p. 194).
105But see p. 49, n. 46.