34 See p. 236 above, with nn. 19, 20.
32H. Chadwick, “Ephesians,” in Peake’s Commentary on the Bible2, ed. M. Black (London, 1962), p. 982.
33But “the argument against the tradition, strong as it may be, falls some distance short of the demonstration claimed for it by the over-enthusiastic” (H. Chadwick, “Ephesians,” p. 982). H. J. Cadbury suggested that scholars sometimes “answer the question [of the authenticity of the letter] one way or the other, more because of their unwillingness to admit indecision than out of clear conviction” (“The Dilemma of Ephesians,” NTS 5 [1958-59], 93).
34 See p. 236 above, with nn. 19, 20.
35See E. Käsemann’s appreciation of the commentary (21958): “Das Interpretationsproblem des Epheserbriefes,” TLZ 86 (1961), cols. 1-8.