Section 40
137See pp. 194-96 with nn. 11-16. The ablest case known to me in favor of the Caesarean provenance of Colossians, Ephesians, and Philemon is that presented by B. Reicke, “Caesarea, Rome and the Captivity Epistles,” in Apostolic History and the Gospel, ed. W. W. Gasque and R. P. Martin (Exeter/Grand Rapids, 1970), pp. 277-86 (especially pp. 278-82).
Addition to n. 97 (p. 23). See also P. S. Alexander, Introduction to 3 Enoch in The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, ed. J. H. Charlesworth, I (Garden City, N.Y., 1983). 223-54; “Comparing Merkavah Mysticism and Gnosticism,” Journal of Jewish Studies 35 (1984), 1-18; P. Schäfer, “New Testament and Hekhalot Literature,” Journal of Jewish Studies 35 (1984), 19-25.