Section 150
174C. H. Dodd, New Testament Studies, p. 81. But there is not such a contrast between the attitude of these two passages and that of 1 Cor. 7:32-34 as Dodd suggests, nor is there any need to account for the change of tone in terms of Paul’s “second conversion” or eschatological reorientation. The tone of 1 Cor. 7 is due in large part to the situation in Corinth, and less is said about subordination in 1 Cor. 7 than in the household codes. In 1 Cor. 7 interdependence is stressed (cf. 1 Cor. 11:11).
175Gk. τοῖς ἀνδϱάσɩν without genitive of the pronoun; ὑμѽν is supplied after ἀνδϱάσɩν in D* F G, while L and many cursives insert ἰδίοɩς (“[your] own”) before ἀνδϱάσɩν (cf. Eph. 5:22; Tit. 2:5; 1 Pet. 3:1).
176Gk. τὰς γυναῖϰας without genitive of the pronoun, but ὑμѽν is inserted after γυναῖxας in C2 D* F G, while ℵ reads τὰς ἑαυτѽν γυναῖϰας and 1175 τὰς γυναῖϰας ἑαυτѽν. Cf. Eph. 5:25 (p. 382, n. 71).
