Chapter 2373 of 2750

Commentary on Harmony of the Law Volume 1 Complete John Calvin

Commentary on Harmony of the Law Volume 1 Complete John Calvin

HARMONY OF THE LAW · VOLUME 1 and therefore slumber in their sins; whereas if they honestly examined their doings, their conscience would straightway smite them. It might, then, happen that the whole people should fail to be aware of their sin, whilst dealing with themselves too gently and indulgently. The meaning therefore is, that although no sense of sin should at first arouse them to repentance, yet, if afterwards they should be awakened so as to begin to acknowledge their crime, God must be propitiated by sacrifices; for otherwise the people might make a cloak for themselves of their error.

22. When a ruler hath sinned. A peculiar atonement is also appointed for the transgression of the rulers; and, although he speaks of the ruler in the singular number, yet inasmuch as the law was not yet enacted that one individual should bear rule, he undoubtedly designates the heads and governors generally, because they who bear rule do more injury by their bad example than private persons. If, then, any of the judges or governors had sinned through error, he might indeed be set free by a lesser victim than the priest or the whole people, yet there was individually this difference between them, that they were to offer she-goats or lambs, and the ruler a he-goat; and the object of this was that those in authority should more carefully keep themselves pure from every transgression, whereas otherwise they are wont to indulge themselves more freely, as if their rank and dignity allowed them greater license. Where we have given as our translation, "If (the sin) shall have become known," (si innotuerit,) translators are not agreed. 604

The word used is properly a disjunctive particle Or; 605 but it is sometimes used for the conditional particle, as we shall see in the next chapter. Those who retain the primary and genuine meaning of the word do violence to the signification of the last word of the foregoing verse, and translate it, "shall have offended" instead of "shall have felt that he has offended;" but since it appears from many passages that,אוo, is equivalent to,אםim, there is no need of wresting the words to an improper sense. The word ,הודעhodang, which they render transitively "to make known," may fitly bear my translation, unless this is preferred, "if he shall have known," (si cognoverit) The words which Moses continually repeats, "the priest shall

Instead of this and the following sentences, the Fr. says, "Les expositeurs font bien ici quelques difficultez literales, mais pource que la deduction ne serviroit rien a ceux, qui ne sont point lettrez, je les passe." Commentators certainly make some literal difficulties here, but since the statement of them would be useless to the unlearned, I pass them by.

,אוOr. Noldius, in his Concord. particularum, cites instances, such as 1 Samuel 20:10, in which this conjunction is equivalent to If.אשםis that last word of ver. 22 which S.M. has rendered deliquerit; but A. V. more happily, is guilty,,הודעsays S.M., is here used for,נודעthe niphal of,ידעbut it is simpler to regard it as a not unusual variation of,הורע the hophal, strictly meaning, caused to become known. — W.

↑ Back to top

↑