Section 32 (Page 99)
IN CONST ANTIA.
e^rjpocpoptjcrev, opiardfievos liri. v. i. fieOapfiocras OvaXevrtvof, ovtws elvai 3SvdSa avovdfia<TTOv, >]S to fJLtv ti Ka\ei<r9ai "
App'trrov, Miss.i.xi.]. to Se ^tytjv.
"EireJTa e/c Tavrtjf Ttjg 3 SvdtSof Seirrepav SvaSa Hxviii- *• characterem doctrinas transferens Valentinus, sic definivit ; dualitatem quandam innominabilem, cujus quidem aliquid [aliud] vocari Inenarrabile, aliud autem Sigen.
Post deinde ex hac from Hippolttus that Valentinus dicates the starting-point of Valenti nus himself, from which position his borrowed his system from Simon, we may add the testimony of Iben.eus, i i . xviii.
§ i, where the initia emisrionum, followers subsequently drifted.
The variation in the number of ^Eons de scribed as contained in the Pleroma of ipxal twv irpofioXQiv, are referred to him.
' tSior xaPaKTVPa SibacKaXelov is ra different Valentinian schools, gives colour ther a <t>l\-qXi£is of Iren^os, as Dodwell observes, and compares c. 23 end, to this supposition.
The parallel and in dependent account of Hippolttus, from its novelty, iB interesting.
Oia\evriyos
andc. 3 1, where the translator again stum toIvvv xal 'HpaxXloir teal UToXep.aios, Kal iraaa j) To&riap erxpMi, ol Ilvdaybpov xal bles at the word SiSaffKaXeiov, and renders it doctrinal, whereas it means a school.
1 it-i)po<pbpT)aev.
Stieben may well HXdruvos p.aQtyral, OKoXovdljaravTes toXs say, Barbara vox; and unfortunately, KaOrryriffapJyois, api8p.7iTiKT)v tt)v SiSaby some omission, the Latin ignores the OKaXlav tt)v iavrwv KaTtfidXavro.
Ka2 word.
Various corrections have been yap roirrwv karlv dpxfy tuv tt&vtuv flo ras iyiinnyros, A<p6apros, OKardXriTrros, proposed, for correction is indispensable ; thus, Hammond would read i^€<pbpr>aev.
Voss, i\ripo<p6pri<re.
Billius, most un aircpiv67iTos, y6vip.os, koX irdyrtav tt)s ycvfoeois alria twv ytvopjviav.
KaXetrcu critically, t<pt\. Cotelebiub, 4if/i)<po<p6prr b" inr' afrrGiv t) Tpoc ipijpL&tj novas, irarrfp.
<rev.
Pearson (and Grabs inclines the Aia<popa
tls eiipto-Kerai toXXtj Trap' avrois' ol pin ykp afrruv tv' t] iravrdsame way) proposes to make the best of the word as it now stands, and considers it to embody the compound idea of iraow Kaiapbv rb Soyfia tov Obakevrlvov Tlv6ayoptKbv, iSifKu koX dfyyov Kal pjy vov rbv Hartpa vofd^ovoiv elvai' ol bk speaking (ypaU A^feffi.
Adding one more leaf to this sylva, I would propose dbtivarov vopi^ovrts dtjvatr&ai t£ dfipevos pivou ybtaa> SXais run ycyenj/ihuv y(i^f/s dipbpiaev, in allusion to the emana vio$ai rtvbs, koX Tip Harpl tup SXojv, tva tions successively described, and which would agree to a certain extent with the yivrrrai wariip, 2iyi)v dvdyKrjs <rwaptff/iovo-i rijv aifuyov.
'AXX4 srepl piv translation.
'Opiffdpxvos may express the marginal attempt of some reader to 2i7^s Trbrtpbv irore oi^oybs iariv 1} oOk recover the true reading.
In the trans t<rrw, adrol jrpbs tavroiis tovtov ^^tgjaav rbv iyuva.
Hippoltt.
Philos.
VI. lation the Cod. Abend, has dcfinit, Voss and others diffinivil: from the two I take
29.
3 Consistently with the above, Hip polttus proceeds to say, Tlarrjp . . .t)v definivit with Mass. and Stieren.
Esse must still be understood. s Compare the extract from the Didasc.
Or.
§ 39, quoted in note 1, fibvos ■fipf/idv «s \iyovffi Kal ivatravbp-cvos airrbs tr iawrip p.bvos.
'Ejrei tl y)w p.
13, which, like Iren^us, speaks of ybvipjos, (5o(ei> airrif irori rb ndWitlx01 o.irr^ ytvthe fundamental duality, Bythus and otov xal TeXewraTOv b Sige ; Hippolttus however speaks of a vijaai Kal rpoaydyeW <piX(prip.os yap closer approximation to the Monad of Pythagoras, and in all probability in oift ijv.
'AydrTi ydp <priaw tfv SXos, 1) Si aydiri) oflic itrrw iydsri), iav ui) rb 7—2 $