Section 27 (Page 67)
TERVERSJONES.
voic, tjroi irapafioXus KvpiaKai, f} pqaets TrpotprjriKas, t) Xoyovg 1i- w. aTrcHTToXiKOvs, Iva to irXaar/xa avrwv fir/ aftaprvpov elvat MAS^I-Tlli- "
SoKrjTtjv fiev TU^tv Kai rov elpfibv rwv ypatpwv virepfialA^llf Ephr vovres, Ka\, otrov e(p' eavroh, Xvovreg ra.
/miXr/ rrjs aXijOelas.
Meracpepovtri Se Kai tierairXarrov<ri, koi aXXo e£ aXXou iroiovvres e^aTrarwat TroXXoi/i rrj rwv ecpap/xo^pfievwv Kvpiakwv Xoyiwv KaKocrvvderw <ro(pia ^jpavracrla Ephr. S."]. "Owep 1 etKovoi KaXqs KaretTKevao-fievris ^e7rtrpoirov ei rn /3ao-iXews /ueX&iyJ 3«c y^tjcplSwv eiruTtjumv vtto <ro(pov re^vlrov, Xuaay G. 36. rr/v viroKeifxevrjv rod avOpwirov ISeav, 3 fxereveyKij ray ^ijcptSas g^**"1 eKelvas, Ka) fieOap/uLoaot, Ka] iroitjcrei /j.op(pi]v Kvvof q aXwireKOi, Epfo!*6™ Kai ^ravrqv (pauAwf KarearKeua<T/j.evriv, eireira oiopi^oiro, Kai Ephr.^ Xiyoi ravrrjv eTvat rqv rod /3a<riXewi eKeivtjv eiKova rt/v KaXrjv,
tiones propheticas, aut sermones apostolicos, ut figmentum illorum non sine teste esse videatur ; ordinem quidem et textum Scripturarum supergredientes, et quantum in ipsis est, solventes membra veritatis.
Transferunt autem et transfingunt, et alteram ex altero facientes, seducunt multos ex lis qua3 aptant ex dominicis eloquiis male composito phantasmati.
Quomodo si quis regis imaginem bonam fabricatam diligenter ex gemmis pretiosis a sapiente artifice, solvens subjacentem hominis figuram transferat gemmas illas, et reformans faciat ex iis formam canis, vel vulpeculae, et hanc male dispositam ; dehinc confirmet et dicat, hanc esse regis illam imaginem bonam, quam sapiens 1 The MSS. of S. Ephr. Stb. have, learned editor's canon as regards ei does like the translator, the accusative, cUira not hold good in later Greek, and inxaXV KaTefTKevaafUrrpi, with the adstances might be quoted from the best dition of eVipieXws, the equivalent of classical writers of el with the conjuncdUigenter. tive, though open to the doubt whether * ifiritplSwv, the small squareB of which later transcribers may not have replaced a tesselated pavement is composed. fjv with el.
On the whole I should
Stieren's note is here given; be inclined to write all three verbs in ex grammalicu regathe conjunctive, and account for the lit hoc loco potcat optativum, pro fierepresent forms of the two last as having (I, Quum conjunctio, v4yKV vXi legunt Grab, et Mtm. excudi arisen from the final now subscript. t, The Bodleian and Colbertine
jutm percveyKOt (melius nereveyKat) et pro jroti)<r« legendum conjicio irovfyreie.
M SS. as well as Asseman'8 edition of S.
The copies of S.
Ephr.
Syrus, for Ephr. Syr. have the genitive absolute, TToifyrci read 7ro(i)<r<w>and write the two Kai toi5tt;j <f>a6\ws KareaKevaaubnis, the preceding verbs in the indicative in fasugtranslator's testimony however is ; gesting rather the form vot-fyrai.
The vour of the present reading.
5—2
S. SCRIPTUBARUM
ltb. I. i. 15. yv o crocpos re^y'iTrji KaTecricevacre, SetKvvg Tat ■^ttjtytSas Tag .9\1o -\ 'S:
-v - "
"■ .'• > < > viii. tcaXwg vtto tov TtjfytTOV tov irpwrov eig rt)v tov pacri XeWg » i '
' mass. l.
<5e v7ro to5 vcrrepov eig Kvvog ripov Ephr. iir^ToC a™- etKova crvvreQelrrag, tcaicwg ft ■ *s > ft /1 * § * svr.
/JLop<f»]v fjLereve-)(pei(ras, icai oia rtjg twv \^tj(pidwv cpavracrtag \ ' t \ f fiedoSevoi TOVg 0L7T€lpOT€pOU$y TOVg KaTaXt]1^/lV {3ci(Tl\lKf]$ fXOp- (ptjg ovk e^ovrag, kcu ire'iOoi oti avrrj crairpa. rrjg aXwreKOg r) icaAt] tov paartAewg eixwv tov olvtov oti idea €<ttiv etceivrj t) w^Assem TP°'7r0V *a' ovTOi ypawv fivOovg avyicaTTvcravTeg, eireira m. 37. pr/fiaTa koi Xej~eig koi TrapaftoXag odev Kat irodev airocrirwvTeg, $.J Ephr^sjfr.'1' e<papf/.61£etv ftovXovTat ToTg fivQoig avrwv [eavrwv Ephr. to.
Xoyta tov Qeov.
Kat ocra /j.ev ev Totg to?? ei/ToyJ tow [£.
HXtjpw/jLaTOi e<papnoXpv<riv, elprjKafiev.
Kat To/y eKToy tov TIXr/pw/iaTog avrwv "Ocra Se
6. irpocrouceiovv Tretpwvrai etc twv ypacpwv, earn TOiavTW tov fcupiov ev Totg ecryaTOtg tov koct/ulov xpovotg Sta. tovto eXrjXvdevai eiri to irdQog Xeyovcriv, eirtSe't^ri to irepi tov 1v avrov tov reXovg eo"x<iTov twv A.iwvwv yeyovbg iradog, Kai Si efMprjvri to TeXog Trji Trepl tovs Aiwvag irpayixaTetag.
Tr)v Jac. v. 11.
Se SwSeKaerr) TrapQevov eKelvr/v, Tt)v tov apyicrvvaywyov 6vyaKvpiog eic veicpwv rjyetpe, tvitov etvai Tepa, rjv enricrTag
artifex fabricavit, ostendens gemmas, quae bene quidem primo artifice in regis imaginem compositae erant, male vero a posteriore in canis figuram translates sunt, et per gemmarum phana tasiam decipiat idiotas, qui comprehensionem regalis formae non habeant, et suadeat quoniam hsec turpis vulpeculae figura ilia est bona regis imago eodem modo et hi anicularum fabulas : assumentes [adsuentesj, post deinde sermones, et dictiones, et parabolas bine inde auferentes, adaptare volunt fabulis suis eloquia Dei.
Et quanta quidem iis, qui [quae] sunt intra Pleroma, aptant, diximus.
16.
Quanta autem de iis, qui [quae] extra Pleroma sunt ipsorum, ad suos insinuare conantur ex Scripturis, sunt talia:
Dominum in novissimis mundi temporibus propter hoc venisse ad passionem dicunt.ut ostendat, quae circa novissimum ^Eonum facta est, passionem, et per hunc finem manifestet finem ejus, quae est 41 circa .Eonas, dispositions.
Duodecim autem annorum virginem illam archisynagogi filiam, quam insistens Dominus a mortuis
PERVERSIONES.
1 eireKTaOetf 6 Xpicrros avrov }•}■JJ SirjyoviTai Ttjs 'A^a/iwfl, tjy ^ai/rajy] e/j.6p<pw<je, teal elf aivOrja-iv riyaye tov KaraXnrovros MAS^I-Vluavrhv (pwTos.
"Oti $e airy eire(pavev
Stor^p e/t-ro? ovtrqs cf. 5 7. tou II\>7j0c5yLiaTO9, ej/ eKTpw/jLaros /uiolpn, tov TLavXov Xiyovcrtv eipijicevcu ev 'Ty [adjTrpwrr/'j irpos JZopivOlovv "Ea-^arov Se •jrdvTWv, axrvepei ru> eKTpwfian, w<pd>] Krifiol.
Tyv Te fierd rcov f/XiKiwTwv tov 2a>T^jOoy irapova'iav irpo<s rqv 'A^a/xa>0, o/jloIws **■i *■ ire<pavepu)Kevai avrov ev rrj avrrj eTriaToXrj, elirovra'
Ael rr\v yvvaiKa 3KaXv/x/ia e-^etv ewi rtjf Ke<paX>js Sid robs dyyeXovs. liberavit, typum esse narrant Achamoth quam extensus Christus eorum figuravit, et ad sensibilitatem adduxit ejus, quod dere-
liquerat earn, luminis.
Quoniam autem ei manifestavit semetipsum Salvator, existenti extra Pleroma in abortionis partu [parte], Paulum dicunt dixisse in prima ad Corinthios epistola :
Novissime autem tanquam abortivo vitsus est et mihi.
Et illami cor. xv. a. quae est cum coaetaneis Salvatoris adventationem ad Achamoth, similiter manifestasse eum in eadem epistola dicentem : Oportere mulierem velamen habere in capite propter Angelos.
Et quoniam 1 cor. xu 10.
3 I cannot agree with (J It ABE that Irln.eus quoting from memory substi 1 {ireKTaffeis.
The use of this word in apposition with iinarat I think tutes Kd\vn/ia for {(ovatav.
A better affords a conclusive proof that it need not involve the notion of extension reason may be found in the Syriac ver upon the Cross in § 13, where see note.
It has exactly the force of iireKTeu>6fuvos in Phil. III.
13, and conveys the notion of progressive movement, stretching for ward.
The geographical position of sion : there the word is the exact equivalent for i^ovala, but it also means any thing worn on the head, i. e, the turban or other ornament serving to distinguish the Satrap's rank.
(So the word K occurring in the Jeru our Saviour, when he raised the daughter of Jairus from the dead, very possibly salem Targum rOE\ cap. vi. is inter suggested a point of analogy to Valenpreted D'OIUD riDpllD flBJVD, a tur tinus.
He was without the boundary of Palestine in the region of Gadara, which JosEPHCS calls rty /inrpdiroXiv ban or fiUct, embroidered with divers colours.) As referring to female costume this could only be the veil.
Hence the •ri}s Utpalas, B. J.
IV. viii.
§ 3.
To commentators have found no difficulty which Christ, i-racraBeU beyond the in assigning to the word i^ovaia its proper signification.
So Theophylact bounds of the Pleroma, was no doubt considered parallel.
Of the translation Grabe says, Achamoth, quam, ita rede says, To tov t£ou<rid£€<r&ai avfifiv\ov, TovriisTi t6 KdXvufia, and Chrysostom, Abund.
But that MS. errs with the Supwcfii l-yKtHaKitpBai oti i) 7W1).
TllEOdoret also renders it Kd\vfifia.
A line rest in having quem.
* The numeral letter a expressed in has been lost here from the transla tion ; in all probability the words vclamcn the translation would easily be lost from imposuit commenced two consecutive the text.
S. SCRIPTURARUM
LIB. L i. 16. Kai OTl tJKOVTOf TOV StOT^flOy 7TDO? aVTt)V, Si CuSdO KoXv/ifia G
GR. I. I. 16.
^ f mass. I. vhi. effeQero $ 'A^a/iwO, Mcotrea ireTroitjKevai (pavepov, KaXvfifia Oe/xevov eiri to irp6<rwirov avrov.
Kai ra iradq Se avrys, a eiraOev, eirt<rea'rjij.eiS><r8ai rov Kvpiov (patrKoveriv ev tiS trravpiS.
Kai ev fxev rep eiireiv 'O Geo?
(tov, £6 Oeoy mo^jJ m «j t/ eyKareXiires /xe; fiefitjvvKevai avrov, on aireXet<p6>] airb tov (pwroi t] ^iO(pta, Kai eicooXvOti virb rov Opov rrjs els roufnirpocrQev opfirjv rqv Se Xvirr/v avrqs, ev tw eiireiv TleplXuiros eirriv 17 ~^rv)(fi fiov ewi davdrov [del. e.
0.]* tov Se (pofiov, ev Tip eiireiv IlaTep, el Svvarov, irapeXderm air e/noO to Toryptov Kat rijv airoplav Se axravrtcs, ev rw elprjKevar at ti eiirw, ovk oioa.
1 pia oe yevrj avvpwirwv ovroos
SeSei^evai SiSdo~Kov<riv avrov to fiev vXikov, 2ev Tip eiireiv adventante Salvatore ad earn, propter verecundiam velamen imposuit Acbamoth in faciem suam.
Et passiones autem, quaa passa est, significasso Dominum dicunt ': in hoc quidem, quod Matt, xxvii. derelicta est a lumine ; in eo, cum dicit in cruce :
Deus menu, Deus mew, ut quid me dereliquisti ? manifestasse eum, quoniam derelicta est a lumine Sophia, et prohibita est ab Horo in priora Matt. xxvi. impetum facere.
Ttedium autem ejus, in eo quod dixisset : *Quam Matt xxvi. tristis est anima mea ! Timorem autem, in eo quod dixerit : Pater, si possibile est, transeat a me caliv.
Et aporiam autem (id est joh. nil. 27. consternationem) similiter in eo. quod dixerit: Et quid dicam nescio.
Tria autem genera hominum [sic] ostondisse docent Luc. ix.47, eum; hylicum quidem, in eo quod respondent dicenti : Sequarte? lines, oue of which was omitted by cruce. El in hoc quidem quod dicit, then careless transcription at a very early the quotation from S. Matthew, date ; for every MS. exhibits the same 4 Quam tristis.
Gbabk says that lacuna.
Grabe supplies the words, quam most probably should have been Mosen id perspicuumfecissc, dumvelamen written quoniam, representing 5ri in the imposuit, &c.
Cf. p.
39, n. J. original.
But it is not impossible that 1 o{ik oT5a, a Valentinian addition to us may have originally preceded the the sacred text, to mark more comquotation as the equivalent of fO, the pletely the notion of dirop/o.
Syriac particle that, prefixed to particia The words were read interrogapial nouns, serves to mark any particular tively by the Valcntinians as expressing stato or condition.
Ur^ r3 would a total inability on the part of gross eagjiy ioge the particle again by assimihumanity to follow Christ. lation, and it is not found now in the 3 The carelessness of copyists has Syriac text.
Still Grabe is perhaps caused confusion.
After dicunt read in right.
rERVERSIONES.
'AkoXovOijo-w vol ', Owe e%ei 6 vlog tov avdpioqjJ,1-,'-,^ ttov irov Ttjv ice<pa\qv KXtvat [kXIvij]' to Se •^/v^ikov, ^ MA8^ tw epwTyaavTt, vl1'- '' tw eiprjKevat tw elirovrt, A.koXov9i<tw trot, eir'tTpe^rov Si fnoi irpwrov airoTa^aerOai rots ev tw oikw (jlov Ot5<5eJc «d. apoTpov Ttjv X€'Pa ^T'jSoXwv, Kai elf to oirltrm (SXeirwv, evderos ecrriv ev rrj ftao-tXela [eis tijv twv ovpavwv.
Tovtov yap /3.
J Xiyov&t tov fxio-ov eivat.
KaKetvov uxravrws t6v to. irXetaTa Se piepi T>ji SiKaiOGvvqs ofioXoyycravTa ireiroitiKevai, eiretTa fit) 6eXycravTa aKoXov6rj<rat, aXXa. vtt6 ttXovtov tjTTr/Oevra, irpbi to fir) TeXetov yeveadai, Kai tovtov tov -^v^ikov yivovg yeyovevat OeXovat.
To TrvevfiaTtKOv, ev tw eiireiv "A(f)ei tovs veKpovs Qct^rat tow eavrwv veKpovv art) Se Se iropevdetg
StdyyeXXe Trjv fiaartXelav tov Qeov'
Kai eiri TiaKyalov tov TeXwvov ettrwv ^iirevcraf KUTa^rjOt, oti arj/iepov ev tw oIkw gov Set fie /jieivai' tovtov? yap irvevfiaTiKov yevovi KaTayyiXXovcri yeyovevat.
KaJ tijv Tyt fyfiqs TrapafioXrjv, rjv yvvij t\ Non kabet filius kominis ubi caput reclinet.
Animal autem, in
e eo quod dixerit dicenti:
Sequar te, permitte autem mihi 'ire et Lucix. si, renunciare domesticis:
Nemo mper^aratrum manum imponens, et in posteriora respiciens, aptus est regno ccelorum.
Hunc autem dicunt de mediis esse.
Et ilium autem similiter, qui multas m«u. xix.i6 partes justitioe confitobatur ee fecisse, post deinde noluisse [nodivitiis victum, ut ne fieret perfectus, et Ientem] sequi, sed a hunc de psychico genere fuisse volunt.
3Spiritale vero, in eo Remitte mortuos sepelire mortuos suos, tu autem vade et quod dicit : annuncia regnumDei; Et Zacchaeo publicano dicens: Properans Luc. ix.eo. in domo tua oportet me manere...*.
Et Luc. xix. s. descende, quoniam hod is fermenti parabolam, quod mulier abscondisse dicitur in farinae i>Q\*1 ^ll ^ .m^"), Suffer that The Arund.
MS. has animales, but the error
apparent, and all other MSS. and the editions read animale; should yo and bid farewell.
Of. E. V. is I The Ab. MS. has spirilalem, and the
see note reading agrees with riv p.laov preceding 3.
; Here again, perhaps, the Latin text but the concord to be followed
yivot. is expresses more faithfully than the Greek Post hav adde, (jure rcspondeant
the words originally written by Iben.sus, for although the word ire has nothing toOtovs yap TrvevuariKov ytvovs GrtecU :
Hos KarayyiWovfft yeywfoai, nempe : corresponding with in the Greek text, namque spiritalis generis fuisse tradunt. it The MSS. omit Properans. has in the Syriac, where we read it
S. SCRIPTURARUM
eytceicpvcpevai Xeyerai eif aXeupov vara Tpia, Ta Tpia yevq MAs&i.Ttu. §fj\0Qv Xeyovcrr yvvaiica piev yap Trjv ~2io(plav Xeyeo-Qai t'BJ- .'• JjjSiSa(TKovatv aXeupov vara [to T^i'aJ, Ta Tp'ia yevrj twv m. 39. avrov tov Se avOpcoirwv, irvev/j.aTiKov, y^v^iKov, yoiKov Xyp.iv 2a)T?jOa eip<j(r6ai SiSdcricovo-i.
Ka! tov TIaSXov StappqSrjv eiptjKevai j^oiKOvt, y^v^iKoui, irvevfiaTiKOvf oirov fiev, Ofo?
Se ol Xoikos, ToiovTOt Ka) ^otKor oirov Se, ^v^ikos avOpwiros 0. 3a ov Several Ta tov irvev/maTOS1' oirov Se, Tlvev/iaTiKOi avaKplvei iravra.
To Se, *$fuyiicd<; ov Several ra. tov irveufxaroi, eirl rov Atjfiiovpyov <paa\v eiprjaQai, ov -^rvyiKov ovra a fjirj eyvwKevai nqre rrjv fxrjrepa irvevfiariKtjv oucrav, fiqre to o"irepi*a avrijg, /UijTe tov? ev tw TlXripw/naTi A.iwvas.
"Oti iSwv [oti
Swt^o, towtwi'
Taj airap^ag aveSe, aii/J "ifAeXXe cru>Xeiv
• Ka! rjv Xafie, tov TLavXov etprjicevai airapyri dyla, Ka] to (pvpafxa. yAirap^riv fiev to irvevfiariKov eiprjaQai SiSd-
>'maf, tovtSo-ti tijv y^v^iKtjv 'E/CKAr/a/av, Se CKOVTes'
(pupafia sata tria, tria genera manifestare dicunt.
Mulierera quidem Sophiam dici docent farinae vero sata tria, tria genera hominum,
; 111ale. choicum.
Fermentura vero ipsum Salvatorem dictum dicunt.
Et Paulum autem manifeste dixisse choices. spiritale, an i cor. xv. 4«. animales, spiritales.
Alibi quidem:
Qualis choicus, tales et
cor. ii. 14. choici.
Alibi autem Animalis homo non percipit quce sunt icor. ii. 15. gpiritus.
Alibi autem
Spiritalis e.raminat omnia.
\_Suppl. Id : autem,] Animalis autem non percipit quce sunt gpiritus, de Demi urgedictum dicunt. qui cum I'sychicus Bit non cognoverit neque matrem spiritalem existentem, neque semen ejus, neque eos qui sunt in Pleromate iEones.
Quoniam autem eorum quos salvaRom. xi. i6. turus erat Salvator initia accepit, Paulum dixisse: Et delibatio si sancta, et massa.
Delibationem quidem, quod est spiritale dictum docentes conspersionem autem nos, id est psychicam :
Grade observes that the word that he was applying the words as
supplied in our received text; altered by the Valentinians, who had 8eo0 is omitted in the Syriac but that their reasons for omitting the word.
The Spirit with them was of Monogenes, it is version, by S. Joh. Chrysostom in bis commentary, and by Clement of Alex p.
11.
The unconscious ignorance of andria, Strom, v.
(Potter's cd.).
Stieren supposes that either the au thor quoted as usual from memory, or a Demiurge, and its removal by Soter, described above, p. 64. is
PERVERSIONES.
to (pupafia aveiXtjcpevat Xeyovaiv avrov, koi ev avrw rjs <rvv- ^R.'i'i'ij'
y MASS.
» vii'. eora\Kevai, eiretor) r)v avros Lynq.
« '
Ka/ OTi eirXavr/Qn] 'A^ayuto^ e/tToy tou TlXijpwJ.
I r) /uaToy, Ka\ efiopcpwOrj viro tov Xpto-rov, Kai avefyrrjOri viro tov /Zarrtjpoi, (itivveiv avrov Xeyovaiv ev rw eiveiv, avrov eX>]Xvdevai evi to ■jreTrXavrjfjLevov [suppl. irpoBarovJ.
TIpoBarov nev yap ireirXavrnj.evov rr\v fj.rjTepa avrwv e^rjyovvrat rqv doSe OeXovtriv e<nrdpdai 'E/c/rAijo-tai'- ?y XeyeaOai, e£ vXdvijv Se, rijv etcros TLXtipw/naroi ev [int. TratnJ TOty irddeai wv yeyovevai rijv vXtjv virorlQevrai.
Tr)v Se StarpiBrjv, e£ yvvaiKa rr]v crapovcrav rr)v oiKiav, /cat evplaKOvaav rr)v Spa%fi,l)v, rtjv avw ^iocplav Siriyovvrai XiyexrQai, r)ns airoXe&atra and is.
rr)v 'Evdujirja-iv avrrjf, varepov Ka6api<r6evrwv irdvrwv Sia rtjs rod "Eoorrjpof irapovo-lat evpl&icei avrriv Sib Kai ravrriv a clttoKaOlara&Oai Kar avrovs evrbs TrXtipwfjLaros.
^ivfiewva rbv Ecclesiam, cujus substantiam assumpsisse dicunt eum, et cum semetipso erexisse, quoniani erat ipse fermentum.
17Et quoniam erravit Achamoth extra Pleroma, et forChristo, et qusesita est a Salvatore, manifestare eum dicunt, in eo quod dixit, semetipsum venisse ad earn quae errasset Luc. mata est a v.
i ovem.
Ovem enim errantem matrem suam referunt dici, ex qua earn, qu» sit hie, volunt esse seminatam Ecclesiam.
Errorem autem, earn, quae est extra Pleroma, in omnibus passionibus immorationem, ex quibus factam materiam tradunt.
Alulierem autem l.:c.»v.
illam quae mundat douium, et invenit drachmam, superiorem Sophiam narrant dici quae cum perdidisset intentionem suam, : post deinde, mundatis omnibus per Salvatoris adventum, invenit quoniam et haec restituitur secundum eos intra Pleroma. earn :
Hence (rwetjr^ai, constUiMe, would not expressed by erarine; either the Greek or the Latin text has suffered change; perhaps both.
The older editors adapt the Latin to the vvrwroXxlnu
is give an unexceptionable meaning, and was most probably the author's word ; although his translator read perhaps droGreek text, and read contraxitse.
Grabe reraKK^vat and wrote evexisst. observes that the metaphor from the The restoration of the superior
fermentation of dough should be pre Sophia to the Pleroma described is of this chapter served, and for the word in the text he that of the inferior Sophia, Achamoth or Enthyabove, §
; proposes to read avv<wt<nt\Khai.
But the subject of the verb mcsis, towards the close of airrbv, mean 12, when is § ing Christ, ir a&rifi referring to tpipafia. she restored to her consort Soter. is
8. SCRIPTURARUM
us. 1. 1.17. «V rag ayicaXag \a/36vTa tov ~X.pto~rbv, koi ev-^apitrTr)cravra m. 40.
1 avTw, Kai elirovra'
Nw avoXveig tov SovXov gov, Se<nrora, MASSji.Tiii.
Kara, to ptjfia o~ov ev eipr/vy, rvirov elvai tov Arjfiiovpyov Xeyovtrtv, wg [ofJ eXOovrog tov ~2iwrrjpog efiaOe Ttjv fieraQemv avrov, koi rjv^aplaTTtiiTe T(p Bvdui.
Kai Sia rtjg ev tw EvayyeXlw Kripvtrcro/uevrig 3Trpo(p^TiSog, eirra err) fiera. avSpog efyicvlag, tov Se Xoiirbv airavra ypovov yypag fievovo-rjg, ayjHg ov tov l&wrrjpa tSovaa eireyvw avrov, ical eXaXei irep\ avrov wacri, (pavepwrara r>]v ^AyafiteQ firjvvecrQai Stopl^ovrai, ring irpbg oXlyov ISovcra tov ^wrrjpa fiera rwv 3 rjXiKtwTobv avrov, o. 39.
Luc. ass Simeon autem eum qui in manus suas accepit Christum, et
gratias egit Deo, et dixit:
Nunc iremittis servum tuum, Domine, secundum sermonem tuum in pace, typum esse Demiurgi dicunt, qui veniente Salvatore didicit transpositionem suam, et gratias egit
Luc. ii. 36.
Bytho.
Et per Annam, quae in Evangelio dicitur septem annis cum viro vixisse, reliquum autem orane tempus vidua perseverasse, donee vidisset Salvatorem, et agnovisset eum, et loqueretur do eo omnibus, manifestissime Achamoth significari dicunt: quas cum ad modicum vidisset tunc Salvatorem cum cosetaneis suis, 1 Grahe remarks that the translator They were simultaneous with the eman ation Jesus or Faracletus, § 8, or Soterj agrees closely with the received text of the N. T. in supplying Deo.
But the author manifestly gives the sense of the § 4, and therefore jjXt/ciun-ac of Soter, § 8 ; but they were an iwdr6urita of the passage from memory, and instead of entire Pleroma, and, therefore, inter se biioycveh.
Tertullian seems to have tvKtrynae rbv debv exhibits a paraphrase.
8 The translator names the prophe understood the term as having reference tess.
Stiehen corrects the Greek from rather to the source of their emanation, the JEom of the Pleroma, Angelos famulos, simulacra dominorum, 19, and the Latin.
But theGreek seems genuine, and requires no correction, if we con he shews that their homogeneity could in no way apply to Soter.
Par genus ; sider the name to have been substituted by the translator for the sake of per si inter se, fieri potest; si vero Soteri conspicuity.
3 rjKiKuarwr.
According to Stieren substantives (ambigue enim positum in this word explains the sense in which Valentinus uses the term ofioyeixts, with reference to the angelic train that vent) quae erit eminentia ejus inter satellites cocequales?
These ij\uaurrai dyyeXoi cer tainly recal to mind the i&iiototiiiaioi ayyi\oi of J USTIN M. Apol. I. 6, upon which passage the reader may consult if he pleases note 3, p. 84, in my Hist, accompanied Soter; i. e. coceval in point of origination, and not homogeneous in point of nature, see note on § 4.
But I am incUned to think that the two and Thcol. of the Creeds.
Cf. p. 23, n. 5.
4 It may be observed that remittis is words are used with relation to two several conditions of their existence. found in the translation of the same
PERVERSIONES.
too Xotvw yj>6vw ttovti /j.ei>ovo~a ev Ty fiecroTtjTi TrpofreSe^ero gr'll \7'.
, , , '-v*\» » » > » » « MASS. I. viii. avrov, 7TOT6 iraXtv eXevaerai Kat airoKaTaaTtjvet avrtjv T>] 4. avT>js crvXvyla.
Ka5 to ovo/xa Se avrrjg fiefxtivvcrdai viro tov ^Ewrrjpof ev too eiptjKevar Kat eStKatwOrj 17 aocpla airo twv Teicvwv avrrjg'
Kat viro TlavXov Se ovtws'
^£o<plav Se XaXov/jtev ev TO?i TeXeloif.
Kai Tag avfyylag Se Tag evTog irXtipdnaTOg tov TlavXov etpt]Kevat (paa-Kovatv 1eiri evog Sel^avTairept yap Ttjg irept tov ftlov arvfyylag ypdcpwv e<p>j'
To /xvcrTijpiov TovTo fjieya eo~Ttv, eyw oe Aeyco etg A.ptarrov Kat Tr/v hiKKXticr'tav.
1 8. vEt< tc o*eJ 'lwuvvriv tov fiaOtjTtjv tov JZvplov s fie/iijvvKevai avralg Xe^eat, SiSacTKovtri Tt)v irpoaTrjv oySoaSa
XeyovTeg ovTwg'
'Itodvvtjg 6 fiadtiTtis tov K.vpiov /3ovXo/xevog postero omni tempore perseverans in medietate, sustinebat eum, quando iterum veniat efc reponat earn suae conjugation!.
Et nomen autem ejus significatutn a Salvatore, in eo quod dixerit :
Justificata est Sapientia a filiis ejus : et a Paulo autem sic : Luc- »■ Sapientiam autem loquimur per/ectis.
Et conjugationes autem icor.u.8. quse sunt intra Pleroma Paulum dixisse dicunt, in uno ostendentem; de ea enim conjugatione, qua? est secundum hanc yitam scribens ait : Hoc enim mysterium magnum est; dico autem EPh T 3*in GAristo et Ecclesia.
18.
Adhuc autem Johannem discipulum Domini docent primam ogdoadem, et omnium generationem significasse ipsis dictionibus.
8Itaque principium quoddam subjecit, quod primum text, rv.
15.
At p.
71 also, in quoting Luke ix. 60, lupes is rendered Remitte.
Yldma St' abrov (ytvero, as appears a few lines on ; as Neandkb says, Genet1 M b>St.
A contrast is drawn be ixche Entm ickclung d. Gnogt.
Sy»t. p.
102, Der Loijo* wurdc Ursache der QettaUung and de* Da»cyn$fur aUe folgende ^Sonen.
It may be open to conjecture, however, tween the cvfvylai in common life and those within the Pleroma.
The Mon Ecclesia represented the entire body, probably, because each .<Eon was a Ple whether omnium does not represent jEonum, Kai rty tCiv aldnxov yii/eaw.
3 The version is defective and may roma, and the iEons were all 'EkkXtftIcu.
See p. 22, n.
Cf. p. 78, 1. 6.
* It has generally been considered be made good from the translation of Billius, by replacing Itaque with the that the Latin version, et omnium gene rationem, is redundant.
I am inclined words Hismet verbis utcntes ; Johannes Domini discipulu», rerumomnium ortum rather to suspect a loss of the words koX rty tCjv vdvrtav ybmytv, from the Greek ; exponere cupiem, juxta iptem Pater omnia produxit. because of the Yalentinian comment on