Chapter 32 of 163

Developments in Theological Literature

Developments in Theological Literature

Developments in Theological Literature

The Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century led to significant developments in theological literature, reflecting the high profile of theological issues at the time. One of the most interesting aspects of the Protestant Reformation was its awareness of the need to communicate and defend its ideas. This led to several important genres of theological literature assuming a significant role at this time.

  • Catechisms: popular presentations of Christian faith, from a Reformation perspective, aimed particularly at educating children.
  • Confessions of faith: statements of the main theological affirmations of a grouping within the Reformation (Lutheran, Reformed, or Anabaptist), aimed at an adult audience.
  • Works of systematic theology, including Melanchthon's Commonplaces and Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion, which offered a systematic analysis and defense of Lutheran or Reformed theology.
  • We shall consider each of these genres of theological literature in what follows.

    Catechisms

    Although what would now be agreed to be catechisms can be found in the medieval church, it is generally considered that the extensive use of catechisms is especially associated with the Reformation. A visitation of Lutheran churches in Saxony over the period 1528–9 showed that most pastors and just about every layperson were ignorant of basic Christian teachings. Luther was shocked by his findings, and decided to increase public knowledge of basic Christian teachings by producing catechisms in German – the language of the people.

    The first of Luther's catechisms appeared in April 1529. Although Luther himself termed it a “German Catechism,” it is now more generally known as the Greater Catechism. The work provides a detailed analysis of the Ten Commandments, the Apostles' Creed, and the Lord's Prayer. These sections were followed by discussions of the two sacraments of the church: baptism and the “sacrament of the altar” (or Communion service). This was followed in May 1529 by what is now known as the Lesser Catechism. This work was written specifically for purpose and shows a lightness of touch, an ease of communication, and a general simplicity of expression which ensured that it was widely used and appreciated. Its question-and-answer format was ideally suited to learning by rote, and the work was widely adopted within the schools of the region.

    The Reformed churches were not slow to appreciate the importance of this literary genre and the educational advantages which it so clearly offered. After some experimentation, Calvin finally produced the Geneva Catechism in French (1542) and Latin (1545). This catechism was widely used within the Reformed constituency until 1563. It was at this point that the Heidelberg Catechism made its appearance. The origins of this major work lie in the growth of the Reformed church within Germany, particularly within the Palatinate. Elector Frederick III (1515–76) commissioned two Reformed theologians (Kaspar Olevianus, 1536–87, and Zacharias Ursinus, 1534–83) to produce a catechism suitable for use in his churches. The result was a German-language catechism of 129 questions, which could be arranged in 52 blocks of material to permit regular teaching throughout the year.

    The extensive Protestant use of catechisms, and the significant results that they achieved, led their Catholic opponents to develop the format. Earlier Catholic catechisms tended to avoid the question-and-answer format and offered extensive discussions of points of theological importance. An excellent example of this may be found in the 1537 catechism of Johann Dietenberger (c.1475–1537), which takes the form of a discussion of the Apostles' Creed, the Lord's Prayer, the Ten Commandments, the “Hail Mary,” and the seven sacraments. However, the superiority of the question-and-answer approach became obvious and was incorporated into the three catechisms of Peter Canisius (1521–97), published over the period 1554–8. This work was published in Latin, as was the more substantial Tridentine Catechism of 1566. While its cumbersome format ensured that it was hardly ever used, the work's appearance in the aftermath of the Council of Trent may be regarded as an important recognition of the significance of the genre.

    Confessions of Faith

    We have already noted how the Reformation placed considerable emphasis upon the authority of Scripture. Yet the Bible needed to be interpreted. As the controversy between the magisterial and radical reformers made clear, there were issues of interpretation that were both divisive and elusive. There was clearly a need for some form of “official” means of setting out the ideas of the Reformation, to avoid confusion. This role was played by the “confessions of faith.” In view of the importance of these documents, we may consider their place within the thought of the Reformation.

    The magisterial Reformation, while placing considerable emphasis upon the authority of Scripture, also recognized a role for the Christian consensus of the past – an idea usually referred to as a “single-source theory of tradition” (see p. 125). In general terms, Protestant theologians can be considered as recognizing three levels or strata of authority.

  • Scripture. This was regarded by the magisterial reformers as possessing supreme authority in matters of Christian belief and conduct.
  • The creeds of Christendom. These documents, such as the Apostles' Creed and the Nicene Creed, were regarded by the magisterial reformers as representing the consensus of the early church, and as being accurate and authoritative interpretations of Scripture. Although they were to be regarded as derivative or secondary in terms of their authority, they were seen as an important check against the individualism of the radical Reformation (which generally declined to regard these creeds as having any authority). The authority of the creeds was recognized by both Protestants and Catholics as well as by the various constituent elements within the mainstream Reformation.
  • Confessions of faith. These documents were regarded as authoritative by specific groupings within the Reformation. Thus, the Augsburg Confession (1530) was recognized by early Lutheran churches as possessing authority. Other groups within the Reformation did not, however, regard it in this way. Specific confessions of faith were, for example, drawn up by other groups within the Reformation. Some were linked with the Reformation in specific cities – for example, the First Confession of Basel (1534) and the Geneva Confession (1536).
  • The basic pattern within the Reformation was thus to acknowledge Scripture as possessing primary and universal authority; the creeds as having secondary and universal authority; and the confessions as having tertiary and local authority (in that such confessions were only regarded as binding by a denomination or church in a specific region). The development of the Reformed wing of the Reformation was complex, with the result that a number of confessions – each linked with a specific region – came to be influential. The following are of particular importance:

    Date

    Title

    Geographical region

    1559

    Gallic Confession

    France

    1560

    Scottish Confession

    Scotland

    1561

    Belgic Confession

    The Lowlands

    1563

    Thirty-Nine Articles

    England

    1566

    Second Helvetic Confession

    Western Switzerland

    Works of Systematic Theology

    The need for a systematic presentation of the theology of the Reformation was obvious from an early stage. The first work to fill this gap had its origins within the Lutheran Reformation. Philip Melanchthon established the definitive pattern for Lutheran works of systematic theology in 1521, through the publication of his Commonplaces. In its first edition, this work simply treated a number of subjects of obvious relevance to the Lutheran Reformation, including the important theme of justification by faith.

    Gradually, however, polemical and educational considerations obliged Melanchthon to expand the work considerably. Melanchthon merely added material, regardless of the impression of a lack of unified structure that this created. It soon became evident that the result was clumsy and disorganized, incapable of achieving the systematic analysis needed for the theological debates of the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The greatest and last work of this kind was published by Johann Gerhard, professor at Jena, in nine volumes (1610–22). Melanchthon's approach to systematic theology ultimately lost out to the much more organized system of John Calvin, to which we now turn.

    Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion had its origins within the Reformed wing of the Protestant Reformation. The first edition, published in March 1536, was modeled on Luther's Lesser Catechism of 1529. The second edition of the Institutes dates from Calvin's Strasbourg period, and was published in Latin in 1539. The final edition of 1559 had 80 chapters – a vast expansion from the original six chapters of 1536. The material was now distributed between four “books,” arranged as follows:

    Figure 3.3 John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion.

    Source: The Granger Collection / Topfoto.

  • the knowledge of God the creator;
  • the knowledge of God the redeemer;
  • the manner of participation in the grace of Jesus Christ;
  • the external means or aids which God uses to bring us to Jesus Christ.
  • It is possible that Calvin had adapted the fourfold structure of the edition of 1543 to create the new division of material. An alternative explanation, however, is that he had noticed and adapted the fourfold division of material in the Four Books of the Sentences of Peter Lombard, a seminal medieval theologian to whom Calvin often refers. Was Calvin setting himself up as the Protestant successor to Peter Lombard, and his Institutes as the successor to his great theological textbook? We shall never be entirely clear about this. What we do know is that the Institutes were now firmly established as the most influential theological work of the Protestant Reformation, eclipsing in importance the rival works of Luther, Melanchthon, and Zwingli.

    ↑ Back to top

    ↑