Summary Outline of the Second Six Known/Accepted Non-Minimal Facts Data
Appendix 3
Summary Outline of the Second Six Known/Accepted Non-Minimal Facts Data
- Burial is multiply attested
- also multiple forms
- Very early, pre-Pauline Creedal sources and sermon summaries for Jesus’s burial
- Indirect eyewitness testimony (Bauckham)
- Greek word thaptō in creed means burial, not dumping
- Pre-Markan passion narrative includes Jesus’s burial
- Archaeological evidence of crucifixion victims
- Embarrassing details
- Jerusalem factor—the story could be checked out
- Jews would bury even crucifixion victims (avoid desecration and eschatological relevance)
- Romans permitted burial
- The Jewish authorities would assure Jesus’s burial/whereabouts
- Jesus’s followers would assure his burial
- Joseph of Arimathea an obscure name
- Enemy attestation from polemic indicating disciples stole the body
- No competing accounts exist
- Natural psychological response
- Multiply attested
- Embarrassing testimony of disciples’ denial and desertion
- Limited dissimilarity
- Possible eyewitness material
- Embarrassing testimony of the women being the first witnesses
- Jerusalem factor, opposition would have checked
- Multiple independent attestation
- 1 Cor 15:3–4 implies an empty tomb
- Acts 2:29–32 and 13:28–37 sermon summaries indicating an early empty tomb report
- Likely pre-Markan passion tradition; empty tomb account could be included
- Contemporary Jewish view primarily of bodily resurrection; New Testament view of bodily resurrection appearances
- N. T. Wright: anastasis and egeiro
- Cook: Paul and Gospels agree
- Enemy Attestation seeking to explain empty tomb
- Matt 27:62–66, Justin Martyr, Tertullian
- Early traditions of Peter and John investigating
- Semitisms in accounts
- Potential eyewitnesses/obscure names (Bauckham)
- Sunday as day of worship
- Gospels as Greco-Roman bios
- No tomb veneration or martyr cult
- Little supernatural elaboration, few details
- Lack of theological/apologetic development or use (dissimilarity)
- Obscure names throughout accounts
- Guards at tomb potentially an early pre-Matthean tradition (Kankaanniemi dissertation)
- No early sources deny ET/no strong alternative accounts
- Little reference to or nuance from Old Testament texts
- Nazareth decree (?)
- Resurrection mentioned in over 300 New Testament verses
- Included as the key to the homologia in the crucial Gospel proclamation (Rom 10:9)
- Early attestation in majority of creedal traditions (1 Cor 15:3–5)
- Multiple forms
- Multiply and independently attested
- This message the basis of New Testament Christology
- Eyewitness testimony (Paul’s two discussions with three other apostles in Jerusalem)
- Early attestation (Acts sermon summaries)
- Multiple independent sources place proclamation in Jerusalem
- Multiple forms
- Plausibility/coherence
- Church meetings begin after Jesus’s resurrection
- Eyewitness accounts of church meetings
- Early sources
- Sunday is referred to as the Lord’s day (also references to third and first days)
- Multiple independent sources
- Multiple forms
Total: 56 primary and secondary considerations plus other relevant factors on the six non-minimal, known/accepted facts (Note: Not all of these are evidences, and there is some overlap when the items refer to more than one fact. Additional factors follow if subdetails are differentiated.)
