Chapter 9 · UECF.NET Study Companion

The Way to Be Holy

Finney rejects the idea that Christ makes us righteous by canceling the law or crediting us with a righteousness we never actually live, and argues instead that Christ restores the one thing sin destroyed — trust in God's character — and trust, rightly placed, produces real obedience.

Search this study companion

    At a glance

    What this verse is not saying

    Christ being the 'end of the law' does not mean the law is abolished for believers, that its penalty simply stops applying regardless of conduct, or that His own obedience is transferred to our account as a legal substitute for our actually becoming righteous.

    What it actually means

    Christ secures the very thing the law always aimed at — real, heartfelt obedience — not by force or threat, but by revealing God's trustworthy character so convincingly that genuine faith is born, and faith, being trust, naturally issues in love and obedience.

    Relevant Scripture

    “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.”

    Romans 10:4 KJV

    UECF.NET summary

    Finney spends most of this chapter clearing the ground before he plants anything, because he believes the phrase 'Christ is the end of the law' has been badly misread in ways that quietly gut the gospel. He rejects the idea that Christ abolishes the moral law for believers, since the law is not an arbitrary rule God could waive but an expression of His own unchanging nature, and any being capable of love remains obligated to it. He rejects the idea that the law's penalty is simply set aside once a person believes, since Christians who sin still feel real conviction and still need real pardon, which the doctrine of an unconditionally canceled penalty cannot explain. And most pointedly, he rejects the popular idea that Christ's own perfect obedience is legally credited to believers in place of their own righteousness — not because Christ's work is insufficient, but because this doctrine assumes Christ owed the law no obedience of His own, which Finney regards as both false and theologically incoherent, since a being capable of benevolence is exactly as obligated to it as anyone else. Each of these readings, he argues, quietly makes the law's real aim — genuine obedience — beside the point, when in fact Scripture is claiming the opposite: that Christ succeeds precisely where the law's mere demand could not.

    Having cleared away these misunderstandings, Finney offers a more constructive account: Christ becomes the law's fulfillment by restoring the one thing sin originally destroyed, which is confidence in God's character. He traces this back to Eden, where the fall began not with an act of defiance so much as a loss of trust — the serpent's slander convinced Eve that God's motives could not be relied upon, and every subsequent sin has repeated that same collapse of confidence in some form. Christ's life, teaching, and above all His death are aimed at reversing exactly this: revealing God as trustworthy and loving beyond reasonable doubt, so that faith, once restored, does what threats and bare commands never could, namely produce willing, heartfelt obedience the way trust naturally governs any relationship, whether marriage, patient and physician, or child and parent. On this view, real holiness is never manufactured by better resolutions or legal maneuvering but grows directly out of a settled confidence in who God actually is; which is why Finney concludes that the entire way to be holy is simply to believe — not a bare intellectual assent, but the kind of trust in God's revealed character that cannot help producing love.

    Main theological themes

    • Christ fulfills the law's real aim — genuine obedience — not by abolishing it, suspending its penalty, or crediting believers with a righteousness they never live, but by producing it.
    • The fall was fundamentally a collapse of confidence in God's character, and every subsequent sin repeats that same loss of trust in some form.
    • Faith is not bare intellectual assent but restored trust in God's revealed character, and trust of that kind naturally and reliably produces love and obedience.

    Key ideas

    • The moral law cannot be abolished for believers because it is grounded in God's own unchanging nature, not an arbitrary rule He could waive without ceasing to be who He is.
    • An unconditionally canceled penalty cannot be true, since genuine Christians still feel real conviction over sin and still need real pardon, not merely the memory of one.
    • Imputed righteousness, as popularly taught, wrongly assumes Christ owed the law no obedience of His own — but a being capable of benevolence is exactly as obligated to it as any other moral agent.
    • The way to be holy is to believe: not bare assent to facts about Christ, but restored confidence in God's trustworthy character, which produces heartfelt obedience the way trust governs any healthy relationship.

    Important concepts

    • Law as God's nature, not His arbitrary will — Finney's foundational premise that the moral law binds even God because it flows from His unchanging character, not because He decreed it — which is why no dispensation, including the gospel, can set it aside.
    • Imputed righteousness (and Finney's objection) — The popular doctrine that Christ's perfect obedience is credited to believers as a legal substitute for their own; Finney rejects it as incoherent, since it assumes Christ himself owed the law no personal obedience.
    • Faith as restored confidence — Finney's definition of saving faith not as intellectual assent to doctrines but as trust in God's character restored through Christ, which by its very nature produces love and willing obedience rather than needing to be forced into them.

    Related Bible references

    • Genesis 3:1-6
    • Romans 8:3-4
    • Galatians 3:23-25
    • Hebrews 11:6
    • 2 Corinthians 3:16-18

    Practical Christian application

    • Where you have been relying on a legal or transactional picture of grace to excuse ongoing disobedience, replace it this week with the specific question: do I actually trust God's character enough to obey Him here?
    • Trace one recurring sin back to a point where you quietly stopped trusting that God's way was genuinely good for you, and bring that specific doubt to Him honestly.
    • Spend focused time this week simply beholding who God has revealed Himself to be in Christ — not asking Him for anything — and notice what it does to your willingness to obey in a hard area.

    Questions for study

    Reflection questions

    1. Where in your life does obedience feel like a legal transaction to be managed rather than the natural fruit of trusting who God is?
    2. Can you trace a specific area of ongoing sin back to a quiet loss of confidence in God's character, the way Eve's fall began with doubting His motives?
    3. What would change in your daily obedience if you genuinely believed, without reservation, that God's character revealed in Christ is fully trustworthy?

    Small-group discussion

    1. Finney rejects imputed righteousness as incoherent, insisting Christ himself was obligated to obey the law. How does the group react to that claim, and what is actually at stake in it?
    2. Discuss the idea that the fall was fundamentally a loss of trust rather than mere defiance. Does that reframing change how the group thinks about the nature of ongoing sin?
    3. If 'the way to be holy is to believe,' how do we tell the difference in practice between real, obedience-producing faith and a merely intellectual agreement with true statements about God?

    These notes are an original UECF.NET study companion on a chapter of Principles of Holiness by Charles G. Finney (this 1984 compilation, edited and introduced by Louis G. Parkhurst, Jr., published by Bethany House Publishers, remains in copyright). No text from the printed edition is reproduced on this page. Scripture quotations are the King James Version (public domain). Readers who want Finney’s own words should read the printed book or the original 1837/1843 lecture sources.

    ↑ Back to top