Chapter 3 · UECF.NET Study Companion

Prove All Things

Before he ever asks what holiness feels like, Finney insists that Christians have a prior duty: to test their beliefs about sin, love, faith, and truth itself against reason and Scripture, rather than absorbing them secondhand.

Search this study companion

    At a glance

    The danger of untested belief

    Vague, unexamined opinions about sin, holiness, love, faith, and humility leave believers unable to give any real account of their faith, and produce a life that looks nothing like the Bible's own picture of these things.

    Testing truth by consciousness and reason

    Every command to examine implies the capacity to do so; consciousness — our direct awareness of our own existence, choices, and thoughts — together with the intuitive moral sense reason gives, is the reliable starting point for testing any doctrine, including doctrines about sin and holiness.

    Relevant Scripture

    “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”

    1 Thessalonians 5:21 KJV

    UECF.NET summary

    Finney opens with the plain implication of 'prove all things': if God commands us to test our beliefs, He must have given us the capacity to do so, and neglecting that duty leaves the church running on unexamined opinions about the very terms — sin, holiness, love, faith, repentance, humility — that determine how a Christian actually lives. He traces this laziness to an ordinary reluctance to think hard, coupled with prejudice, both of which prevent a candid hearing of the evidence. The Bible, he insists, is not a substitute for careful thought but a partner to it: Scripture assumes truths that reason already grasps — our own existence, moral agency, right and wrong — and then adds further truths reason alone could never have discovered, though once revealed they are perfectly recognizable as true.

    To show how such testing actually works, Finney grounds all human knowledge in consciousness — the mind's direct, certain awareness of its own existence, choices, thoughts, and feelings — which he treats as the one class of evidence no one can coherently doubt. From this starting point he argues that reason itself supplies certain self-evident moral truths the moment its terms are understood: that right and wrong are real and different, that moral agents are genuinely free, and, most importantly, that moral character belongs neither to feelings nor to outward acts but to the will's ultimate intention — the final end a person actually lives for. Everything in the lecture builds toward this last point, because it is the same principle Finney will use throughout the rest of the book to locate true holiness in the heart's governing choice rather than in emotion or performance.

    Main theological themes

    • Christian duty includes the duty to think — to test doctrines and definitions rather than absorb them uncritically.
    • Consciousness is the one certain foundation of all knowledge, including our knowledge of moral truth.
    • Moral character resides in the will's ultimate intention, not in feelings, desires, or outward acts, which are themselves involuntary or merely their fruit.

    Key ideas

    • Any command to 'prove all things' presupposes the ability to do it; if God requires examination, He has already supplied the faculties needed for it.
    • Confused definitions of ordinary Christian words — love, faith, repentance, humility — are not a minor problem, since a wrong definition guarantees a wrong life.
    • Natural theology (what reason discovers) and revealed theology (what Scripture adds) confirm rather than compete with one another; the Bible assumes reason's basic truths and builds further truths on top of them.
    • Consciousness gives certain knowledge of our own existence and mental acts, and from this reason derives self-evident moral truths, culminating in the claim that character lies in one's ultimate, governing choice.

    Important concepts

    • Consciousness (as Finney uses it) — The mind's direct, self-certifying awareness of its own existence, choices, thoughts, and feelings — the one kind of evidence Finney treats as beyond honest doubt, and the starting point for testing every other claim.
    • Ultimate intention — The final end a person actually chooses and lives for, as distinct from the many lesser, proximate goals that merely serve it; Finney locates all moral character here rather than in feelings or outward deeds.
    • Natural vs. revealed theology — Natural theology is what unaided reason can discover from creation and moral consciousness; revealed theology is what Scripture adds. Finney treats them as two authentic, mutually confirming books rather than rivals.

    Related Bible references

    • Acts 17:11
    • Romans 12:2
    • 1 John 4:1
    • Proverbs 4:7
    • Hosea 4:6

    Practical Christian application

    • Pick one word you use often in your faith — love, faith, repentance, humility — and write out, in your own words, exactly what you mean by it before checking it against Scripture.
    • The next time you accept a religious claim because a respected teacher said it, pause and ask what evidence or reasoning actually supports it.
    • Spend time this week simply attending to your own choices, noticing the difference between what you merely feel or desire and what you actually will and pursue as your goal.

    Questions for study

    Reflection questions

    1. Which core Christian term have you assumed you understood, but have never actually tested against Scripture or careful thought?
    2. Can you identify your own 'ultimate intention' right now — the final end you actually live for beneath your various daily goals?
    3. Where has fear of hard thinking, rather than honest evidence, kept you from examining a belief you hold?

    Small-group discussion

    1. Finney says most people avoid hard thinking about religion. Where does your group see this happening, even among sincere believers?
    2. Discuss: how would your group define 'love' and 'faith' right now, without looking them up? How closely do those definitions match Scripture?
    3. If moral character lies in the ultimate intention rather than in feelings or actions, how should that change how your group encourages one another toward holiness?

    These notes are an original UECF.NET study companion on a chapter of Principles of Holiness by Charles G. Finney (this 1984 compilation, edited and introduced by Louis G. Parkhurst, Jr., published by Bethany House Publishers, remains in copyright). No text from the printed edition is reproduced on this page. Scripture quotations are the King James Version (public domain). Readers who want Finney’s own words should read the printed book or the original 1837/1843 lecture sources.

    ↑ Back to top