Chapter 1 · UECF.NET Study Companion

Christian Perfection I

Finney opens his most searching subject by asking a plain question: does the command ‘be ye perfect’ describe a status believers only enjoy in heaven, or a present duty God actually expects His children to fulfill by faith?

Search this study companion

    At a glance

    What perfection is not

    Not equality with God's infinite nature, not freedom from temptation, and not the sinless static perfection of heaven — these confuse God's essential attributes with the moral obedience He actually requires of creatures.

    What perfection is

    Full, willing conformity of the heart to the law of love — loving God supremely and one's neighbor as oneself, with no reserved corner of self-interest left unsurrendered.

    Relevant Scripture

    “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.”

    Matthew 5:48 KJV

    UECF.NET summary

    Finney begins the whole collection with the command that gives the book its urgency: ‘Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.’ He is careful, first, to say what this cannot mean. It cannot require the natural perfections that belong to God alone — His eternity, omnipotence, or infinite knowledge — since these are not moral qualities but simply what it means to be God, not man. Nor does Christian perfection mean an end to temptation, to the ordinary trials of embodied life, or to what he calls the believer's continuing warfare with sin's pull. Perfection, as the text uses it, is moral: the will brought into full and willing agreement with the law of God, which asks nothing more, and nothing less, than whole-hearted love for God and an equally impartial love for one's neighbor.

    Having cleared away the misunderstandings, Finney argues that this kind of perfection is both a present duty and a real possibility, not a distant hope reserved for heaven. It is duty because the gospel never lowers the law's own standard; if God cannot rightly ask for less than whole-hearted love now, no dispensation excuses less. And it is attainable, Finney insists, because God does not command impossibilities, because Scripture's promises of sanctification are stated without qualification (he singles out Paul's prayer that God would ‘sanctify you wholly’), and because the Spirit's entire work in a believer's life is aimed at exactly this end. He closes by answering the objections he expects: that habit is too strong, that the body's appetites cannot be mastered, that even the apostles confessed imperfection, and that professing perfection breeds pride or fanaticism. His answer to each is the same — the difficulty is never a lack of power in the gospel, but a lack of faith to take hold of what has already been promised.

    Main theological themes

    • The command to be perfect is a call to moral, not metaphysical, likeness to God — love without self-interest, not the incommunicable attributes of deity.
    • The gospel does not relax the law's demand; it supplies, by faith, the power the law alone could never give.
    • Unbelief, not the strength of habit or the frailty of the body, is the real reason full sanctification is rare.

    Key ideas

    • Perfection here means entire, willing conformity to the law of love, not equality with God's nature or an escape from every trial of life.
    • Because God commands it, the ability to obey it — in the moral sense of a willing heart — must exist; otherwise God would be requiring what no one could ever do.
    • Scripture's promises of sanctification (such as 1 Thessalonians 5:23) are not hedged with 'partly' or 'someday' — they describe a real work meant for this life.
    • Objections drawn from habit, bodily appetite, or the apostles' own confessions of shortfall answer the wrong question; none of them show that the remedy Christ offers is insufficient, only that it is seldom fully trusted.

    Important concepts

    • Natural vs. moral perfection — Natural perfections are what belong to God's essential nature (eternity, power, knowledge) and are never asked of creatures. Moral perfection is the willing rightness of a heart's love, which Scripture does command.
    • Disinterested benevolence — Finney's term for love that seeks the good of God and others for their own sake, without self-interest folded quietly back into the motive.
    • Moral inability — A now-classic distinction (Finney credits Jonathan Edwards) between lacking the faculties to obey (natural inability) and simply being unwilling to obey (moral inability) — the second is not a true excuse.

    Related Bible references

    • 1 Thessalonians 5:23–24
    • 2 Peter 1:4
    • Ezekiel 36:25–27
    • 1 John 1:9
    • Philippians 2:12–13

    Practical Christian application

    • Name one area where you have quietly assumed God does not really expect full obedience, and bring it honestly to Him in prayer this week.
    • Instead of multiplying resolutions, practice bringing a single recurring temptation to Christ by faith, asking Him to do in you what effort alone has not done.
    • Read 1 Thessalonians 5:23–24 aloud as a prayer for yourself, noticing that Paul expected God to answer it, not merely to forgive its absence.

    Questions for study

    Reflection questions

    1. Where have you assumed the command 'be ye perfect' must be poetic exaggeration rather than a real, present expectation?
    2. What is the difference, in your own life, between hungering for holiness and actually being brought to it?
    3. Which of Finney's answered objections (habit, the body, the apostles' own confessions) most closely matches an excuse you have used?

    Small-group discussion

    1. Finney distinguishes 'natural ability' from 'moral inability.' Why does this distinction matter for how we talk about besetting sin in a small group?
    2. If perfection means love without self-interest rather than flawless performance, how should that change the way we define spiritual growth?
    3. Discuss: does teaching that full sanctification is attainable encourage presumption, or does avoiding the teaching encourage resignation to sin? Where is the balance?

    These notes are an original UECF.NET study companion on a chapter of Principles of Holiness by Charles G. Finney (this 1984 compilation, edited and introduced by Louis G. Parkhurst, Jr., published by Bethany House Publishers, remains in copyright). No text from the printed edition is reproduced on this page. Scripture quotations are the King James Version (public domain). Readers who want Finney’s own words should read the printed book or the original 1837/1843 lecture sources.

    ↑ Back to top