Chapter 7 · UECF.NET Study Companion

The Identity Evidence

Part 2 shifts from documents to the person. Witherington shows that Jesus’ self-understanding matches his followers’ worship — not a later upgrade.
Interview: Dr. Ben Witherington III

Was Jesus Really Convinced That He Was the Son of God?

Search this study companion

    At a glance

    Son of Man

    Jesus’ favourite self-designation draws on Daniel 7: a figure who shares the authority of God.

    Son of God

    He forgave sins, accepted worship, and spoke of unique intimacy with the Father — claims no ordinary rabbi could make.

    Relevant Scripture

    "But he held his peace, and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven."

    Mark 14:61–62 KJV

    UECF.NET summary

    Part 2 asks who Jesus thought he was. Ben Witherington III, a New Testament professor, examines Jesus’ titles and actions. UECF.NET’s companion emphasises that Jesus did not merely teach about God; he acted as if God’s kingdom were present in his words, healings, and authority to forgive sins. The title ‘Son of Man’ is not a modest nickname. In Daniel’s vision, the Son of Man receives everlasting dominion. When Jesus uses that phrase about his coming glory — before the high priest — he is claiming more than human status.

    Witherington also treats ‘Son of God’ in its first-century setting. It could describe Israel or a king, but Jesus’ pattern of speech and deed pushed further: unique knowledge of the Father, power over demons, and acceptance of behaviour that belongs to God alone. The Gospels do not show a gradual drift from teacher to god. They show a man who already spoke and acted in ways that forced a verdict — liar, lunatic, or Lord.

    This chapter bridges history and discipleship. If Jesus believed he was the Son of God in the strong sense, then his call to follow him is not moral advice from a sage. It is allegiance to the one who holds the keys of death and hell.

    Main theological themes

    • Jesus’ self-designations — especially Son of Man and Son of God — as claims to divine authority
    • Forgiving sins and receiving worship as actions only God can rightly perform
    • The trilemma framework: Jesus’ identity demands a response, not polite neutrality

    Key ideas

    • Jesus’ enemies understood his claims better than some modern teachers who soften them.
    • The trial before Caiaphas centres on identity, not ethics — ‘Art thou the Christ?’
    • If Jesus was mistaken about being God’s Son, he cannot be a good moral guide only.
    • Part 2 will test whether such claims could come from a sane, righteous person — or from God incarnate.

    Important concepts

    • Son of Man — Jesus’ title from Daniel 7, implying heavenly authority and vindication after suffering.
    • Authority to forgive sins — A prerogative Jesus claimed for himself, shocking scribes who knew only God forgives.
    • Trilemma — The logic that Jesus as liar, lunatic, or Lord exhausts the options if his claims were earnest.

    Related Bible references

    • Daniel 7:13–14
    • Matthew 9:2–6
    • John 10:30–33
    • Luke 22:66–71
    • Hebrews 1:1–3

    Practical Christian application

    • Read Mark 14 slowly and write down every claim Jesus makes about himself in one chapter.
    • Stop calling Jesus ‘a good teacher’ until you decide whether his self-claims allow that label.
    • Worship him this week by name — Son of God — not only as a historical figure.

    Questions for study

    Reflection questions

    1. Which of Jesus’ claims about himself is hardest for you to sit with — and why?
    2. Do you live as if Jesus has authority to forgive your sins, or as if you must manage guilt alone?
    3. How does the high priest’s question — ‘Art thou the Christ?’ — become your question too?

    Small-group discussion

    1. Why do many people admire Jesus’ ethics while ignoring his identity claims?
    2. Is ‘Son of Man’ clearer or more confusing to modern readers? How did Witherington clarify it?
    3. How should evangelism present the trilemma without sounding like a rhetorical trap?

    These notes are an original UECF.NET study companion and are not a reproduction of Lee Strobel's text, which remains in copyright. Read chapter 7 — book pages 175–191 — in The Case for Christ by Lee Strobel (Zondervan, 1998 edition). Scripture quotations above are the King James Version. No quotations from Strobel are included on this page.

    ↑ Back to top