Search this study companion
At a glance
Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John present themselves as accounts of a real man in real history, witnessed by people who saw and heard him.
If the biographies are early and eyewitness-based, they are not myths written centuries later. They are primary sources for Jesus.
Relevant Scripture
"For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty."
2 Peter 1:16 KJV
UECF.NET summary
Chapter 1 opens Part 1 by asking whether the four Gospels can be trusted as biographies of Jesus. Craig Blomberg, a New Testament scholar, walks through the standard historical questions: Were these documents written close enough to the events to be checked by living witnesses? Do they read like careful history or like detached legend? Do they include the kinds of embarrassing details that inventors usually leave out? UECF.NET’s notes stress that the Gospels are not anonymous fairy tales. They name places, rulers, customs, and people in ways that invite verification.
Blomberg’s contribution, as the chapter presents it, is to show that the Synoptic Gospels and John fit within a first-century genre of biography that aimed to tell the truth about a person’s life and significance. The authors had access to tradition — and, in several cases, direct testimony. Luke explicitly says he investigated matters carefully; John insists his testimony comes from what was seen and heard. Even where the Gospels differ in detail, they agree on the central portrait: Jesus taught with authority, performed mighty works, clashed with religious leaders, and was crucified under Pontius Pilate.
This companion chapter therefore treats eyewitness testimony as the foundation of Christian confidence. The rest of the book will test that foundation — textually, archaeologically, and legally — but Part 1 begins here for a reason. Without trustworthy biographies, there is no case for Christ to examine. With them, the investigation has documents worth cross-examining.
Main theological themes
- The Gospels as first-century biographies grounded in testimony, not late legends
- Embarrassing details and specific settings as marks of historical honesty
- Eyewitness memory as the Bible’s own standard for proclaiming Christ
Key ideas
- Legends grow bolder with distance; the Gospels were written while opponents and witnesses could still be consulted.
- Invented stories rarely include disciples who flee, deny, or misunderstand — yet the Gospels do.
- Agreement on major events with variation in secondary details is what historians expect from independent witnesses.
- Trusting the Gospels is not blind faith; it is a reasoned judgment about genre, date, and testimony.
Important concepts
- Eyewitness testimony — Firsthand report of what was seen and heard — the Gospels claim this kind of foundation.
- Gospel genre — Ancient biography focused on the character and deeds of a person, not a modern novel.
- Criterion of embarrassment — Historical principle: accounts that make leaders look bad are unlikely to be later inventions.
Related Bible references
- Luke 1:1–4
- John 19:35
- 1 John 1:1–3
- Acts 1:21–22
- 1 Corinthians 15:3–8
Practical Christian application
- Read one Gospel chapter this week as a historical document: note names, places, and claims that could be checked.
- Ask a skeptical friend which part of Jesus’ life they think is legend, and look up what scholars say about its date.
- Thank God that faith rests on witnesses who saw Christ’s majesty, not on fables.
Questions for study
Reflection questions
- Do you treat the Gospels as sacred but not historical? What would change if you held both together?
- Which embarrassing Gospel detail makes the accounts feel more, not less, believable to you?
- Who in your life needs to hear that Christianity claims eyewitness evidence, not mere opinion?
Small-group discussion
- What is the difference between ‘trustworthy biography’ and ‘inerrant Scripture’ in a study group setting?
- How do popular myths about ‘lost gospels’ affect people before they read Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John?
- Why would God choose eyewitness testimony rather than private revelation alone as the foundation of faith?
These notes are an original UECF.NET study companion and are not a reproduction of Lee Strobel's text, which remains in copyright. Read chapter 1 — book pages 21–46 — in The Case for Christ by Lee Strobel (Zondervan, 1998 edition). Scripture quotations above are the King James Version. No quotations from Strobel are included on this page.
