Part 53 of 72

and Matthew, Marcy, Melinda (kneeling below), and Mark.

and Matthew, Marcy, Melinda (kneeling below), and Mark.

Zz 7. John and Patricia with family, 1988: (left to right) Kelly (née Gallagher)

and Matthew, Marcy, Melinda (kneeling below), and Mark.

Across the Pacific

Qe there came a similar development. A first

international office of Grace to You was established in Mumbai (Bombay), India, in 1981, and during that decade the

ministry at Grace Church was to go on air in a widening circle

of nations from Australia and South Africa, to the Philippines

and the United Kingdom.

John MacArthur 1s not by temperament a traveller. As already

mentioned, he was in Brazil in 1978. He made a first visit to

Britain (Scotland) in 1979, but it was not until 1988, when he

was forty-nine, that he toured a series of countries across the

Pacific. It was prompted by news coming back through the tape

and radio ministry. In a Grace to You letter (February 1986)

MacArthur reported:

Phil Johnson, Managing Director of Word of Grace,

recently returned from a three-week trip to Asia, and he

told me he learned of Christians who listen to Word of Grace tapes in several places we didn't even realize we were penetrating—in the remote provinces of the Philippines,

in the slums of India, and even in an out-of-the-way place

like North Borneo. It's exciting and awesome to think

94 JOHN MacArTHurR: SERVANT OF THE WorD AND FLOCK

that messages I preach from our church pulpit are being heard by people in parts of the world I will never be able

to visit. At the same time, it is a powerful reminder of the weight of responsibility that God has placed on all of us who know the truth. If the message is biblical, it has no geographic or cultural bounds.

As the value of MacArthur making a visit to some of these

far-off places became clear to him, and to the elders at Grace,

a tour was planned for August and half of September 1988.

Patricia and all the family were to go with him, so that in

addition to preaching there would be some days for vacation.

Not normally a journal keeper, John's sense of the potential

importance of these weeks prompted him to keep a record of

the whole period they were away.

For the first time the family stood on southern-hemisphere soil when their plane landed in Auckland, New Zealand, on Tues-

day, August 2, 1988. It was the start of many new experiences.

Driving on the left-hand side of winding roads, through green

meadows, in sight of some of the land's seventy million sheep,

and with Maori music and feasts in the evenings—these were

things unknown in California. The first weekend was filled with

engagements at Totara Springs and Auckland. Some five hundred

to six hundred people assembled at the former for a conference

where MacArthur spoke twice. The response of hearers pointed

to the great need of the country: serious exposition of Scripture

was uncommon and charismatic influence prevalent.

The next week took them to South Island, first to Shotover

River Gorge, where they 'put on life jackets and got on a jet boat for the best thrills ever'! Then to Queenstown, before a

five-hour trip to Milford Sound. John notes:

Across the Pacific

Only fifteen on the beautiful Volvo bus—breathtaking, magnificent scenery—nothing to match its grandeur. Cloudy, drizzly weather made for thousands of waterfalls

... Milford Sound was beyond description—massive rock mountains rising straight out of the water to thousands

of feet in height. The wonder of God's glorious mind and

creative power was clear. The most spectacular scenery we

have ever seen.

After a further conference at Christchurch, the MacArthurs

flew to Australia, passing through Sydney ('brilliant weath

lovely city') to Adelaide. Sunday, August 14, was a full day

Adelaide, concluding with a service at the Town Hall attend by one thousand people at 7 pm. At that meeting Grace to You

in Australia had a plentiful supply of books and literature that

was speedily taken up. The preacher noted:

Amazed to see that so many had heard me preach on

tape, or read books, particularly, The Charismatics. Aus-

tralian churches are either liberal and dead or weak and charismatic, with few small exceptions. No strong leaders seem to be setting a national standard for strong doctrine, confrontational teaching and preaching. No one seems to be taking up the issues and confronting error—to become

a clarifying voice and lead people to recognize the truth and hold the line for it. Charismatics and non-charismat-

ics co-exist with seemingly no problems at present due

to the weak, non-confrontive style of preaching. Mostly devotional, not doctrinal or even expository.

Two days later he was in Melbourne, and straight into a pas-

tors' luncheon with 150 men; later a meeting with five hundr

in Camberwell Town Hall. The interest in Grace to You literature

was especially heartening. MacArthur noted in his journal:

96 JOHN MacArTHurR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

My prayer is not unrealistic—not to reach large numbers,

rather to have the teaching available for those who hunger and desire solid meat, and will be used to start a new movement of spiritual depth, strong commitment and doctrinal distinctness. Committed people tend to gravitate

to our material.

Similar services followed in Sydney and Brisbane—capitals of New South Wales and Queensland respectively. At Parramatta,

NSW, such numbers came to a meeting in the church hall of St

John's, that the venue had to be changed to the cathedral itself.

The response to the work of Grace to You—with its office in Sydney—was especially noteworthy. By August 21, John had

spoken twenty-five times in eighteen days, interspersed with a

few days of vacation. As they flew north to Singapore on that

date, his final reflection on a first visit to the Antipodes was,

'Great need for biblical, powerful preachers and strong spiritual

leaders." Of course, he had seen little of a vast land but few

discerning Australian Christians would have differed in their

assessment.!

With the flight to Singapore they left the winter of the

southern hemisphere behind them, and their winter clothes

were sent home. Singapore, 'an island nation, seventy-five per

cent Chinese, at the tip of the Malay peninsula', constituted an

impressive introduction to the Far East: 'Bustling and beautiful,

clean and uncluttered, amid tree-lined parkways, with the most

'In his journal, MacArthur agreed with the words of A. W. Pink: 'The great need of Australia today is for God-sent and God-anointed men, who will not shun to declare the whole counsel of God; men in whom the Word of Christ dwells richly; men on whom rests the ex of God, so that they are delivered from the fear of man. Iain H. Murray, The Life of 'Arthur W. Pink (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1981), p. 42. An enlarged edition of the Pink biography was published by the Trust in 2004.

Across the Pacific 97

efficient subway in the world', there was much to fascinate them. Among those to welcome them on arrival was twenty-eight year

old Alex Lee, the enthusiastic local organizer of Grace to You

tape and book ministry. That lives were being touched by that

ministry was evident at a meeting of over a thousand mostly

young people, of whom MacArthur noted:

Great interest, eagerness to buy books, tapes, especially Lordship book—sold out! Spoke on Matthew, Gospel According to Jesus. Rich dialogue after. I was amazed to have such a response half way around the world—with people I didn't know—but who knew me.

Equally good discussion arose out of Question and Answer

session at a visit to Singapore Bible College:

Same questions as at home. The church is always needing

clarification on the issues of qualifications and disqualifica-

tions for membership; women in leadership; sin and reformation; how to handle unbiblical elders; how to change

the church tradition to conform to Scripture.

Experiences less familiar than those at home included a ten-

course Chinese banquet, with a first taste of octopus, and a first

visit to a crocodile farm. Among his overall impressions of the

Christian scene were the 'strong evangelical association, good

people in leadership, and much activity'.

On Thursday, August 25, the family left their pleasant rooms

on the 24th floor of the Westin Plaza, unaware of quite how

different their situation would be before the day was over. Sin-

gapore was not typical of the East.

A flight to Bangkok was uneventful, but there was a hint

of future problems when they sought to transfer to their on-

98 JOHN MacArTuHur: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

going flight for Delhi: "They had erased our reservations off

the computer and informed me we had no seats. After an hour-

and-a-half hassling, we got on—scattered in smoking section;

eventually we swapped seats to be together.' Their first night in

India consisted of five hours sleep at the Imperial Hotel. The

building was shared with rats and cockroaches; and, with no hot

water, it had long since ceased to warrant its proud name. The

next morning saw them out of doors, on a two hundred km bus

ride to Agra and the Taj Mahal; but any respite was countered by the mental discomfort over much they had to witness:

Incredible to see Delhi—a sea of destitute poor, teeming people, animals, and cars. I had the feeling I was seeing human society at its lowest social level. The poverty is consummate, everywhere—outside a beautiful government building, or a politician's estate, the poor live on the street with their shacks of straw, mud, cow dung, brick,

plastic, or canvas, huddled in tiny places only their gaunt

little bodies could fit.

When they arrived back at the Imperial at 10 pm that night

it was with 'chaotic impressions of this strange and tragic land

... Vast wasteland reeking with the feel of demonic presence.'

There came home to John, as never before, a sense of the 'despair,

deprivation, and pain' that must belong to hell itself.

A tour within Delhi arranged for the Saturday was only

half taken. A meeting with Christian leaders at the YMCA

that evening underscored the reason for their being in the country. Some fifty men gathered in a room so hot that the many fans almost drowned the human voice. Even so, there was good listening, and some evidence that the work of Grace

to You India was reaching people. The extent of the need in

Across the Pacific 99

evangelical churches, however, was stunning. Doctrinal interest

was minimal: "The need seems to them so desperate that they

don't care what the theology is.' As a result neither the dangers

of liberalism on one hand, or of 'easy-believism' on the other,

were recognized. Nor was there any warning of ecumenism

from evangelicals. 'I estimate', the visitor reflected,

our tapes will either turn the tide of this softness or make me unpopular because those who accept the teaching will pose problems to the 'establishment'. At the end of his

life, A. W. Tozer said he had preached himself off every Bible Conference platform in America—that may happen

to me in India.

The next morning, Sunday, MacArthur preached at the

Apostles' Methodist Church, and the message was summarized

by the pastor in Hindi. In the evening he preached to 250 at

the Delhi Bible Fellowship. In contrast with his brief presence,

books could be permanent, and he believed that too strongly

to leave their circulation to others: 'I am Pane The Gospel

According to Jesus with all the leaders I meet.'

The first day of their second week in India, August 29, took

them by air to Calcutta. On what followed their escape from

the chaos of the airport, he wrote:

Boarded a hot steamy bus for ride to Baptist Mission Society guest house right in the heart of the city. The

streets were small, crowded, shacks, shantys, and broken sidewalks were home to thousands. Many rivers and ponds appeared along the road, filled with busy people, swim-

ming, bathing, washing clothes, with water buffaloes,

cows, and smells nothing short of sickening embedded

in all of us.

100 JOHN MacArTHUuR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

Their accommodation proved to have few assets apart from

its 125 years of history. A blackboard at the guest house des-

ignated their names and room assignments—for them a tiny

room with two small beds, and for the five young people more

of a barrack-type room with six beds. Conscious of the need to

avoid gastro-intestinal infection, they had some apprehension

on seeing their lunch prepared on the floor, but at least the

floor was stone and not cow dung. The only sight-seeing they

were to do was to take place that Monday afternoon. Two of

the most frequently visited tourist spots were within walking

distance from the Mission House, and, with misgivings, they

scrambled along sidewalks, between dogs, people, and filthy

oozing drains to these locations. Naked children, pleading for

money, were on all sides:

Patricia, with her tender heart for the little ones, found it

especially difficult to give them nothing. They sensed her sympathy and so clung to her in clumps. We resisted giving them anything on account of urgent advice given to us on how to act in urban centres.

Their first stop was at Mother Teresa's convent where they

spent some time with the aged lady whose care for the sick and dying had made her famous. They were impressed with her

success in recruiting helpers, with the abundance of medical

supplies, but sad at the vacuum where gospel truth was needed. Conversation with Mother Teresa revealed a very vague understanding of Christianity. 'All my people die beautiful deaths', she assured them. 'I love and respect all religions, but I love my Jesus.' But in a city where Hindus believe Jesus was the seventh incarnation of Shiva, and Krishna the eighth, the 'Jesus' was not presented as the only Lord, Saviour, and Mediator. Nor had

Across the Pacific IOI

Roman Catholic teaching helped Mother Teresa in that regard. 'May you enter the heart of Jesus through Mary', she wrote in

the Bible of one visitor.

If this convent visit was disturbing, still more so was their

second stop that afternoon. 'Crushed between the dilapidated

buildings of the crowded city, and down an obscure alley next

to Mother Teresa's home', they found the temple of Kali, the

wife of Shiva, a member of the Hindu trinity of gods (Brama,

Vishnu, and Shiva). This appeared to be the religious focal point

of Calcutta, and the place where animal sacrifice was carried on

every afternoon at 3 pm. Amid noise and incense, demon wor-

ship was busily in progress, including the disgusting worship

of a male phallus:

Staring Satan's worship cold in the face was a chilling experience—my inside felt icy though I was dripping with the sweat of heat and sickness. To think that Mother

Teresa was there and helping people physically but not confronting Satan's hellish domain was sad. It all looks so hopeless and so dishonouring to Christ. I felt I had really

seen the kind of idolatry the Old Testament speaks of and

there was a form of Christianity tolerating it. Truly these

are a people in bondage to fear all their lives.

MacArthur's feelings in the temple of Kali were akin to

those of the psalmist when he wrote, 'Indignation has taken

hold of me, because of the wicked who forsake your law' (Psa.

119 53u

Despite the precautions they had sought to take at meals,

by the first evening Matt was very sick, with severe cramps,

rigours, vomiting, etc. John got through a meeting with

some church leaders at the Baptist Church next door, only to

102 JOHN MaAcArTHUR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

succumb to the same symptoms later that night. The next day

was their twenty-fifth wedding anniversary. With their rooms

now like an infirmary it was to be unforgettable. Engagements

at Serampore had to be cancelled, and John did not move from

his bed except for necessities. Patricia had stomach pain but 'was

a gracious nurse and tended to me'. Never in his life did he feel

so uncomfortable; the heat was stifling and an open window

only added to the oppression as crow-like birds in trees outside

filled the air with loud and ugly noise.

Sometimes I thought the sense of isolation from my

life at home would never end. This went on all day and night—no one went anywhere except to get medicine. I am sure that when William Carey came to Calcutta it was

a much nicer place—quieter, cleaner, and not devastated by fourteen million people.

The Tuesday night was only their second in Calcutta; it seemed

they had been there a great deal longer. Of it he wrote:

Another sleepless night filled with intermittent prayer that

the family would be well and me for the busy schedule

in the Philippines. I prayed for the church, the elders, people, many I knew had needs, for the students, for the radio/tape work, for my partners in ministry, feeling badly I couldnt give Patricia a better day,

When the morning came—Wednesday, August 31—they

were able to get to the airport, 'quietly and somewhat bent

over, longing for cool, clean air'. When, at last, they boarded

a Thai flight for Bangkok, a cold orange juice 'tasted like it came from heaven'. A night in Bangkok aided the recovery of

the invalids who were not yet able to take anything more than

soup and drinks. John's journal note read: 'I threw my shoes

Across the Pacific 103

away—they were covered with such filth and odour that they

were not recoverable!' The next day, Thursday, September 1,

took them across Cambodia, Vietnam, and the China Sea to

Manila, where there was time to relax by the coast before first

meetings on the Saturday.

Of all the places visited thus far, Christian work in Manila had

known the most of John MacArthur's ministry. For some years

his preaching had been heard over FEBC radio, and personal

contacts with Grace Church had prompted the start of two

Manila churches where he preached. He was struck by the unity

among Christians of different denominations and the youth-

fulness of so many of his hearers. Everywhere the people were

'open, warm, happy, and responsive'. The fact that the preacher

shared the same family name with the Philippines' World War

II liberator, Douglas MacArthur, added to the exuberance of

the welcome he received. At an unplanned book-signing event,

the crowd of 5,000 became so crushing that an assistant could

only stop it by taking away his pen.

There was only time for five crowded days in the Philip-

pines; it was enough to impress upon the family the character

of numbers of the believers. "The church', John observed, 'is

made up of the common, humble people', and he saw the grace

of God in them.

aie

After Manila, one of the most eagerly anticipated visits of the

whole tour still lay ahead as their plane descended to the spec-

tacular airport of Hong Kong, 'with all the islands, blue ocean,

mountains, and high buildings'. Before them was a first week

104 JOHN MacArTHuR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

in China. The first three days were spent in Hong Kong itself,

largely in meetings with individuals, all concerned by differing

means for the spread of the gospel across mainland China. One

pastor, who had spent twenty years in prison, gave first-hand

news of the house churches in Wuhan. Another leader, Jonathan

Chao, was organizing literature work, and the two men did an

interview which was broadcast. Chao's hope was to have Grace

to You material translated into Mandarin for radio ministry into

the mainland.

On the Friday they all crossed by the Boeing Jetfoil to the

mainland, each carrying Bibles and study books. The first stop

was Macau where, at the evangelical church of Pastor Lam,

they were heartened by the serious, aggressive evangelism in

progress. On a huge map of the city every neighbourhood was

identified, with notes on the taking of the gospel to them. But

the time MacArthur prized most in Macau was to stand at the grave of Robert Morrison (1782-1834), first Protestant mis-

sionary to China:

Since no missionaries were allowed, he came as an employee of the East India Company. For over twenty

years, in solitude (the graves of his wife and son, who died before him, are next to his), he hid alone in an upper room and worked on a Chinese language dictionary and the translation of the Scripture. It was a very moving experience to stand beside his grave. I felt very deeply the

sacrifice, and meditated on his dedication. The millions of Chinese Christians in the underground church today

reflect the fruit of his labour.

A river, and some four or five check points, separated Macau

from 'Red' China.? The visitors went across and, with their

* At that time Hong Kong was still a colony of Britain, and Macau of Portugal.

Across the Pactfic 105

books, passed guards without incident. After walking through

a busy market, they proceeded to a cemetery where evangelicals

were given a chapel building for use only on Sundays. Otherwise

it was kept locked and unused. At this building they were shown

a window, deliberately left broken, through which books could

be put. Here they left MacArthur's The Church the Body of Christ

and other books in Mandarin and Cantonese. Numbers of titles

had previously been received by believers in that location by the

same means; such 'dropping points' for books being a common

means for the distribution of Christian literature.

Leaving the city behind, they were taken by their guide along

side roads into the countryside, where they were all surprised by the beauty, 'the greenest hills and fields we had seen since New Zealand':

We walked through obscure, out-of-the-way villages,

visiting the homes—completely unexpected and unannounced—and always, no matter how poor, they offered

us hot tea! Very gracious—as are the Asians in general. They laughed with us, as Esther interpreted, and showed

us humble homes, asked us to sit down—to see the kitchen and their board beds with mosquito nets.

We came to a town of 250,000 and met the pastor of

that Three Self Church. He is a believer, but his church

is totally controlled by the government. It 1s their way to show the world that they have religious freedom, but the

pastors of these churches are old. The authorities want

the church to appear to die a natural death when this old generation is gone. The house church movement on the

other hand is illegal, but is vital and growing. Jonathan Chao estimates fifty million Christians.

They were back in Hong Kong for meetings on Saturday and

Sunday. On the Saturday he spoke, through an interpreter, to

106 JOHN MacArTHuR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

about one hundred pastors on twenty marks of a ministry of

integrity, followed by another valuable Question and Answer

session. The final engagement was a service the next morning

at Kowloon Baptist Church.

Only one leg of the tour now remained, and it began as they

reached Seoul late in the evening of September 11. The airport

was full of welcoming flowers and banners, intended, however,

not for them but for athletes who were arriving from all over

the world for the Olympics, which were about to be held. The

MacArthurs' coming to Korea, however, was not unrelated to

the Olympics. For the next three days John was to speak every

morning (with simultaneous translation) to the five hundred to

six hundred delegates of the World Congress of Sports. 'I love to

talk to athletes', he noted, 'especially those serious about ministry

for Christ.' After the second day, he wrote in his journal, "It was

important to be clear, simple, direct, and speak slowly. I tried.'

They saw the Olympic stadium and village, where they met the USA basketball team and chaplains. Other hours in a full week

were taken up with visits to orphanages, two pastors' conferences,

an army base, churches and the Seoul Theological Seminary.

Somehow there was time to form an impression of Seoul—

'clean, modern, efficient, and a city of beauty'. But it was the

believers he met who made the deepest impression on him:

The Korean Christians are amazing—prayerful, daily quiet

time, love to sing, joyful, not materialistic, and happy. God

has really blessed them. They are humble and respectful. So many of the unsaved are in Asia that these Asians are

the vital resource to be trained to reach their continent. We need to be on radio in Seoul.

Across the Pacific 107

At the same time there were some features that gave him

concern. The world's so-called 'largest church' in Seoul left him entirely unimpressed: "The services are wild and noisy—mixing

Christianity with pagan worship; major emphasis on prosperity

and healing.' Another common danger was more subtle and less

often recognized. It was a near worship of education, giving a

too high priority to degrees for the Christian ministry—'The

pursuit of doctorates is a major issue—credentials are very important—much too important.' Coupled with this was the

high status given to pastors, a factor that could prompt students,

looking for the pastoral office, to start more new churches than

was necessary. An eagerness for overseas degrees was also leav-

ing too many Korean believers open to the influence of foreign

academic institutions which held to Scripture in a much looser way than did the builders of the church in Korea. An example

of this was to be seen in the guest house where the MacArthurs

stayed (the Asian Center for Theological Study), and where a

professor from Fuller Theological Seminary took a seminar on

'the integration of psychology and theology'.

As MacArthur and his family took the overnight flight Home

on September 16, there was still much to write in the conclusion

of his journal. Two-and-a-half hours out from Los Angeles the

final sentences read:

Much to pray about as the dawn comes up through the windows of this 747. Didn't sleep on the eleven hours flight—too much thought about all we have experienced. I pray that all the experiences of this wonderful trip will enrich our lives and ministry and greatly impact the effect of our service to the Lord.

108 JOHN MacArTHuR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

wie

Two comments are needed to round off this chapter. How did

MacArthur get time to prepare messages for so many engage-

ments in the crowded weeks since the beginning of August?

The answer is that he took with him about twelve sermons on

themes fundamental to the needs of churches, which he had

no hesitation 1n repeating. Most used of all was a sermon on

the sufficiency and authority of Scripture from Psalm 19, on

which a humorous note 1n Patricia's handwriting has survived.

It seems to have been scribbled in a service at some point in the

tour and, passed to another member of the family:

Marcy says—if Dad gets sick anywhere along the way there

are seven of us that could preach Psalm 19 for him! If you

are not sick yet—you will be by the time church is over

with all the hacking and sneezing and coughing over your

shoulder. Get the SYRUP out!

But the preacher was not diverted from giving that subject

first place, with other sermons on such themes as the right knowledge of God, and true versus temporary conversion. Deep impressions were made by these sermons in many places.

The journal shows that the preacher went on this tour as a

learner as well as a teacher. In all the churches he found things

to be admired—in 'tragic' India he noted, 'Many people sacrifice

for the Lord here.' In the Philippines he saw how Americans

could gain from the example of 'the humble servant hearts' of

believers. In Korea he said of the Christians, 'We could learn

so much from them.'

Across the Pacific 109g

This first visit to the southern hemisphere and the Far East

bore lasting fruit, an indication of the Lord's blessing upon

it. Although most of these places would not be visited by MacArthur again, he would never forget the impression they

had made on him. His sense of debt to others was deepened,

and in the years ahead there would be unwavering commitment

to an increasingly worldwide ministry. The room in the home

of Vern Lummus, where the first recording was preserved in

1969, had led to the opening of a door to help millions.

ae * oie ah

4 oF tte 2netlepaleeran a

meanee Gewese w Snel oat ere wi Lessin od aca ithe ol AMG Sor rere » ears otdeene vai oils coche Cow aoa re a

Jjinineter') seers peuple taeos \etiottraycharndegeniplllbmatelle = * aha "suai nnh nan SAT eee er

fib feet fe spud ememadermaeal pearl thot TureceMallias wiseiic ashy pelbaipcnlaita itt

08 u

ime Piprte mericanippnerttAr:

PARE 7 "ane : , wn et hieee | Hoy ats ap spoke

fag Ley erage promis tyereiiy bammion Wiep, nate Pew D. Abbhky Pra 2@ 7 rr? #

ni? @ . eo OD ae ey Caren Oe he Lash

"2 - dihipae 60 "eee

*Ts, (So Oye oe qe Whelan 10.) ie ©

-Uius » ey OE fe ge tee iia Aw. mhee, UNL Remit anvil creep nad

Vogel. Os "TA Y esi : _

hee ere Eien 08 tate Pe De 4. Tine Qe hu Mie? eth Nig ater al Sterne

os ot hs Spo WO) cal pete emery erty (ene st

. ¢ ore ne? Pe erro PS Me gath i ae © 4 yaad 19th sao

Fa oc ene ita Badd has -enell h

in 2 "4 oaed of ee

VeLhk @orG (sim _

Controversy

T: Gospel According to Jesus was a MacArthur title published

shortly before his tour across the Pacific in 1988. As will

have been noticed, it was the book he gave to a number of pas-

tors during those weeks away. In some ways this was to be the

most important book of his life, bringing together issues that

had become increasingly urgent to him through the years.

Eight years passed between John's first mentioning of this

projected title to Phil Johnson at Moody Press and its final

publication. It was not that it had been put on one side. In the

Preface, John affirmed, "This book has consumed my thoughts

and much of my time for nearly four years.' It had also provided

a subject for much discussion among his staff at Grace. Lance

Quinn, who became Associate Pastor in 1986, recalled some of

it when speaking with MacArthur many years later:

A small group of your close associates began to think with you about the implications of evangelicalism's weak gospel presentations, so many of these presentations being

reinforced through books with equally weak theology, and which were so greatly disturbing to you (and to us) at the

time. We began earnestly to discuss, reflect, research, and

2 HEE

112 JOHN MacArTHurR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

then ultimately see the release, in 1988 by Zondervan, of one of your most significant books, The Gospel According

to Jesus.

That this book was published by Zondervan, and not by Moody (as Phil Johnson had promised MacArthur), requires

comment. Moody had issued a contract for the title in 1982,

as already mentioned, but while the book was still being writ-

ten, a problem arose. Moody's leading author at the time

was Charles C. Ryrie of Dallas Theological Seminary, and he

was also one of the leading proponents of the position being

refuted in The Gospel According to Jesus. When Moody learned

that the book would quote from Ryrie and critique his teach-

ing, they asked John if the book could be toned down so as to

reflect no disagreement with Ryrie. When John assured them

that this was impossible, rather than risk the danger the book

threatened, Moody preferred to withdraw from their contract

with the author.

There was another reason why The Gospel According to Jesus

was seen as a doubtful venture. It had become customary among

publishers to believe that titles majoring on doctrine would

never find a large market or command attention. MacArthur

recalls, "Several publishers warned me that the book was "too doctrinal" to sell.' Yet a best-seller was exactly what The Gospel According to Jesus became. In the words of Phil Johnson, it was

'an instant worldwide blockbuster'.

In the Preface MacArthur wrote,

My prayer is that this book will provoke discussion, arouse

prayer and self-examination, and lead ultimately to a reso-

lution of these issues within conservative evangelicalism.

Controversy 113

Given that his case questioned the presentation of the gospel

supported by 'almost every Bible College or Seminary', he knew

the controversy that Moody Press had feared was unavoid-

able and immediate. John H. Gerstner called the effect of its

publication 'an ecclesiastical earthquake'. This was inevitable,

for the case for gospel preaching, which MacArthur presented,

challenged a great deal of contemporary teaching. His Preface

paid tribute to many with whom he disagreed—'many are my

friends'-—but insisted on the serious nature of the difference:

Other controversies have generated more heat and spawned more print, such as questions on prophecy, modes of baptism, styles of worship, and so on, but these

are truly peripheral to the real issue. The gospel is not. It

is the issue.

MacArthur's case was that current teaching had

subtly changed the thrust of the gospel. Instead of exhorting sinners to repent, evangelicalism in our society asks the unsaved to 'accept Christ'. That makes sinners sovereign and puts Christ at their disposal . . . This modified gospel

depicts conversion as a 'decision for Christ' rather than a life-transforming change of heart involving genuine faith, repentance, surrender, and rebirth unto newness of life.'

Against this, MacArthur argued that more than faith is

involved in a true conversion. Saving faith is never without a

new birth, making the individual 'a new creation' and indwelt by

the Spirit of God who has brought this about. To explain how

'converts' continued to lead worldly lives, the popular teaching

held that a person could be a Christian without personal holi-

ness; he might accept Jesus as Saviour but not yet 'as Lord'.

1 The Gospel According to the Apostles, p. 74.

114 JOHN MacArTHuR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

For MacArthur, this was alien to the Scripture: Any "salvation"

that does not alter a lifestyle of sin and transform the heart of

the sinner is not a genuine salvation."

His critics dubbed this teaching as 'lordship salvation,

claiming that it was error to treat moral change as necessary to

conversion for that would be to introduce 'works', whereas the

sinner's justification is by faith in Christ alone. Typical of that

view were the words of one critic, quoted by MacArthur:

'Of course Jesus taught a lordship message', one old-line

dispensationalist brother wrote me. "He was preaching to

a people under law. Under grace we must be careful to

preach a grace message."

In the extensive controversy on this subject the issue was

often confused. As MacArthur observed, an age used to sound-

bites and little theology was poorly placed to understand what

was at the heart of this issue. Some, who were ignoring that

conversion entails more than a changed legal standing before God in justification, thought he was jeopardising the truth of

justification by faith alone. They failed to teach that grace secures

a decisive break with sin, demonstrated by repentance and new

obedience. "True saving faith is a repentant faith in Jesus Christ,

and that produces good works.'

What is more, when an individual is savingly convicted of

sin, he or she desires more than forgiveness; such a person

wants salvation from sinfulness; he is ready to pray, 'Save me

from myself!"

Salvation is for people who hate their sin. It is for individu-

als who understand that they have lived in rebellion against

> The Gospel According to Jesus, p. 79.

* The Gospel According to the Apostles, p. 35.

Controversy 115

a holy God. It is for those who want to turn around, to

live for God's glory.

To bring individuals to that awareness, preachers should fol-

low Christ's example in dealing with the rich young ruler:

'Evangelism must take the sinner and measure him against the

perfect law of God so that he can see his deficiency.* 'Don't

be afraid to teach your children what God's law demands . . .

The law's moral standards give us the necessary foundation for

understanding what sin is."

Conversion has a human side and a divine side. On the human

side the promises of the gospel supply the warrant for immediate

repentance and trust in Christ; yet this will not happen where

there 1s no conviction of sin. It was at this point that Dispensa-

tionalism missed the significance of the law of God in the Ten Commandments. It supposed that 'law' means self-effort, and

salvation by works. But such was never the purpose of the law.

The law, in its revelation of the character of God, and of man's

obligation to love Him 'with all your heart, and with all your

soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind' (Luke

10:27), brings home the seriousness of human sin. The law

demands repentance, but

when Christ demanded repentance, he was not calling sinners to self-reform. In fact, authentic repentance

* Thid., p. 84.

5 Successful Christian Parenting, p. 55. One reason many evangelicals are afraid of teaching the Ten Commandments is their concern lest the fourth commandment should be regarded as obligatory. In the Question and Answer session at the 1997 Shepherds' Conference, MacArthur indicated that was no good reason to be silent on the law. He believes that while the ceremonial

aspects of the law, instituted at Sinai, are no longer for Christians, it is right

that 'Sunday is set aside for celebrating the finished work of the Saviour', and good that believers attend public worship both morning and evening.

116 JOHN MacARTHUR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

begins with the sinner's recognition that one is hopelessly

in bondage to sin and powerless to change. Jesus' clas-

sic example of repentance was a tax gatherer who came

to understand his hopeless position . . . This publican's conversion demonstrates how repentance is far more than a simple adjustment of one's opinions about Christ

.. . While there is no question that repentance involves

a change of mind, it certainly does not end there. It is

a wholesale change in direction, a change in purpose, a change in attitude, and a change of affections. All of this can only be the result of God's gracious regenerating work and is therefore evidence of true salvation.®

Modern evangelism had gone wrong in confusing the rela-

tionship between the human and the divine in conversion. Man

is responsible to repent and believe; both are essential parts of

evangelistic preaching; yet both are gifts of grace and will not

be found until there is a change in human nature at its deepest

level. The saving sight of Christ (which is faith) depends on

'God's initiative and power . . . Spiritual sight is a gift from God that makes one willing and able to believe . . . The result of spiritual sight is a surrendered, worshipping heart."

MacArthur was charged with displacing 'grace' by introducing

the moral element into conversion. On the contrary, he replied,

it was the teaching he was opposing that reduces the place of

grace. It makes the human 'decisiom the controlling event, and

leaves salvation in the sinner's own hands. But the grace that

saves 1s greater than his critics were recognizing:

* Address on "The Glory of True Repentance', in Assured by God, ed. Burk Parsons (Phillipsburgh, NJ: P&R, 2006), posisle2:

Aibids pp. 73-5. No doubt it was on account of such statements that MacArthur was accused of being a hyper-Calvinist. His book, The Love of God (Dallas: Word, 1996), shows how mistaken that charge is. He says, with Calvin, 'the Father loves the human race' (p. 85)

Controversy P17

True grace is more than just a giant freebie, opening the door to heaven in the sweet by and by, but leaving us to wallow in sin in the bitter here and now. Grace is God presently at work in our lives. By grace 'we are His workman-

ship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them' (Eph. 2:10) . . . That ongoing work of grace in the Christian's

life is as much a certainty as justification, glorification, or any other aspect of God's redeeming work.®

MacArthur had been brought to see the issue which Warfield

had referred to in his review of Chafer quoted earlier—the truth

rediscovered at the Protestant Reformation, that 'knows no

determining power in the religious life but the grace of God',

had become mixed with error 'from the laboratory of John Wes-

ley'. Rather more accurately in the American scene, MacArthur

traced the error that Chafer, and much of Fundamentalism

accepted, to Charles G. Finney, who taught that man does not

have a fallen nature:

He concluded that people are sinners by choice, not by

nature. He believed the purpose of evangelism should

therefore be to convince people to choose differently—or

as many would say today, 'make a decision for Christ.'

'He taught that salvation required no sovereign regeneration by

God, but only the act of the human will.' This led, as MacArthur

goes on to say, to the whole apparatus of 'altar calls' and to the

'easy-believisnY' which it inevitably promoted.'

§ The Gospel According to the Apostles, pp. 32-3. ° Ashamed of the Gospel, p. 158. See also the extended Appendix, 'Charles Finney and American Evangelical Pragmatism', pp. 227-35. The pervasiveness of this teaching in Fundamentalism is scarcely open to question. George W. Dollar wrote that 'Most Fundamentalists . .. would have refused to adopt any statement of the Five Points [of Calvinism].' History of Fundamentalism, p. 270.

10 Hard to Believe, pp. 83-4.

118 JOHN MacArTHUR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

MacArthur's follow-up title to The Gospel According to Jesus

was The Gospel According to the Apostles, from which I have

already quoted. Written five years after the first book, it added

substantially to the biblical argument. In his Preface MacArthur

regretted that

the overwhelming majority of criticisms have nothing whatever to do with biblical matters. Some reviewers have complained that the lordship issue is too divisive, the message too hard, or my position too dogmatic. Others have argued semantics or taken exception to my terminology. Some have feigned indignation, claiming The Gospel According to Jesus is an unfair personal attack on them, their

friends, or their organization.

Zane Hodges, Professor of New Testament at Dallas and a

leading critic, believed that MacArthur had fallen into 'the error

of the Puritans'. Hodges charged the Puritans with corrupting

the Reformers' doctrine of justification by faith, and called the

Puritan teaching on faith and assurance 'a tragic blemish on

the history of the Christian church'.'' While MacArthur's posi-

tion was in no way dependent on the Puritans, it is true that

his reading of church history had confirmed his convictions.

He wrote:

'' Zane Hodges, Absolutely Free! (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1989), p. 32. This same accusation was introduced to British evangelicals by R. T. Kendall, who takes the same Antinomian position as Hodges, and is quoted by MacArthur as writing: "The person who is saved—who confesses that Jesus is Lord and believes in his heart that God raised Him from the dead—vill Jo to heaven when he dies no matter what work (or lack of work) may accompany

such faith. In other words, no matter what sin (or absence of Christian obedi-

ence) may accompany such faith.' Once Saved, Always Saved (Chicago: Moody,

1983), pp. 52-3 (italics in original). Kendall argues that Paul's warning in Ephesians 5:3-6 does not concern exclusion from heaven. Further on this, see my David Martyn Lloyd-Jones: The Fight of Faith (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1990), pp. 721-6.

Controversy 11g

The preponderance of Bible-believing Christians over the centuries have held these to be basic tenets of orthodoxy. They are the standard precepts of doctrine affirmed,

for example, by all the great Reformed and Calvinist creeds,

He documents that assertion in an appendix to The Gospel

According to the Apostles, and also answers the argument, loved

by some critics of the Puritans, that they represented a departure

from Calvin. A quotation from Calvin epitomises exactly where MacArthur (and the Puritans) stand. The Reformer wrote:

We must take care not to separate what the Lord perpetually conjoins. What then? Let men be taught that it 1s impossible they can be regarded as righteous by the merit of Christ, without being renewed by His Spirit unto a holy

life . . . God receives none into His favour who are not

also made righteous.'*

wie

The lordship controversy had not died down before another

was to follow. It related to a subject MacArthur had first faced

while preaching through 1 Corinthians in 1976. California

was in many ways the starting point for the Charismatic move-

ment; and, by the mid-seventies, its main ideas had gained

wide acceptance and popularity across the nation. Disturbed by

this development, in his preaching on that Epistle MacArthur

included a series on the Charismatic Movement; published in

1978 as The Charismatics: A Doctrinal Perspective.

12 The Gospel According to the Apostles, p. 25. i3 Tbid., p. 161.

120 JOHN MacArTHuR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

While his treatment of the subject anchored his own church,

it had a limited hearing in the wider evangelical scene as the movement continued to spread and gain acceptance. By 1979,

it is said, nineteen per cent of all Americans identified them-

selves as charismatic or Pentecostal.'*

In 1992 MacArthur published a revised and fuller treatment

of his earlier book under the title Charismatic Chaos. In the

Preface he wrote, 'I sincerely thank God for the many charis-

matics who sincerely love the Lord and want to obey Him.'

But he did not regard that sentiment as justification for say-

ing nothing on the issues. For a time he seemed to be largely

alone in his conviction that the new teaching was threatening

evangelicalism through a back door. His case was that the

enthusiasm for revelatory prophecies, and for apostles today,

ignored the uniqueness and sufficiency of Scripture. To the

argument that the movement was divinely authenticated by

the renewal of miraculous gifts, he replied that Scripture, and

not alleged experiences, is the test. He pointed out how many

contemporary 'prophecies' had been proved false by the test

provided in Scripture (Deut. 18:21-22). Yet this was brushed

aside by the promoters of the Charismatic movement. Feeling

and phenomena were being made the focus of attention, not

Scripture and doctrine. While its central message—'the baptism

of the Spirit—claimed Scripture for its support, charismatic

belief was guilty of reconstructing biblical teaching on con-

version when it argued that 'salvation does not really give us everything we need for spiritual victory. We are still lacking;

we need something more.'

'* Richard Quebedeaux, The New Charismatics (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1983), p. 84.

Controversy 121

In challenging this thinking, MacArthur is careful to show

that the issue is ot for or against more experience of God. It is

about how that experience is to be gained:

Lifeless, dry orthodoxy is the inevitable result of isolating objective truth from vibrant experience. But the answer to dead orthodoxy 1s not to build a theology on experience. Genuine experience must grow out of sound doctrine. We

are not to base what we believe on what we have experi-

enced. The reverse is true. Our experiences will grow out of what we believe.

The Holy Spirit is working mightily in the church today, but not in the way most charismatics think. The Holy

Spirit's role is to empower us as we preach, teach, write,

talk, witness, think, serve, and live. He does lead us into God's truth and direct us into God's will for our lives. But He does it through God's Word, never apart from It . . . to

use phrases such as "God spoke to me', or "This was not my

idea; the Lord gave it me', or "These aren't my words, but

the message I received from the Lord', confuses the issue of the Spirit's direction in believers' lives today."°

MacArthur's case is that, instead of leading to true revival, the

Charismatic movement takes Christians in the wrong direction:

No genuine revival or orthodox movement has ever been

led by people whose authority is based in any way on pri-

vate revelations from God .. . A longing for something new and esoteric has replaced historic Christianity's settled confidence in the Word of God—and that is an invitation

to Satan's counterfeit.'°

Some who in 1992 thought the word 'counterfeit' too strong,

revised their judgment after the so-called "Toronto Blessing?' at

15 Charismatic Chaos (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1992), p. 65.

16 Tbid., pp. 58, 73.

122 JOHN MACARTHUR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

the Airport Vineyard Church in that city in 1994. Once again the

advocates of this phenomenon claimed that the 'extraordinary

events' were proof that the work was of God. In what was meant

to be a favourable report, an article in Charisma declared: 'Ona

typical evening, dozens of people can be found lying or rolling

on the floor or laughing uncontrollably." William De Arteaga

sought to silence any criticism of these happenings with his

book, Quenching the Spirit. Together with other Toronto sup-

porters, he appealed to the awakening in the time of Jonathan

Edwards to justify what was happening at the Airport Vineyard.

But MacArthur was able to show that an authentic appeal to

Edwards proves the very opposite, for no one was stronger in

refusing to allow the mystical and the emotional to displace the

test of Scripture.

wie

The controversies considered in this chapter warrant obser-

vations.

North-American Indians, when travelling by river, were said

to be able to detect the approach of dangerous rapids well before

they came into sight. It is the business of Christian leaders to see

dangers before others see them. This has been a very necessary

feature of MacArthur's ministry at a time when the toleration

of errors has almost become regarded as a virtue.

He saw that the main issue in the Lordship controversy was

vitally related to the health of the churches.

The teaching that sought no recognition of Christ's lordship

in conversion had grown out of thinking which gave no place

to the law of God. But instead of law being contrary to grace, it

Controversy 123

is, Paul affirmed, by the gospel that 'we establish the law' (Rom.

3:31). Christ died 'that the righteousness of the law might be

fulfilled in us' (Rom. 8:4). In other words, salvation's purpose

is to restore man to the likeness of the God whose image 1s

revealed in the holiness of the law. Certainly it is true that 'free

from the law' means deliverance from its condemnation through

Christ. The law cannot be the basis of justification for believers,

for Christ has fulfilled its demands and penalties in their place.

But the moral perfection which the law displays remains a rule

for their lives. Exemption from the law, in that sense, would be

no blessing at all.

MacArthur grasped this truth when few others were speak-

ing to it: "Those in Christ are no longer under the ultimate

penalty of the law, but are far from free of its requirement of

righteousness."!7

He saw how it was this wrong teaching on conversion,

combined with the setting aside of the law, that had brought

on superficial Christian living and worldliness in the churches.

'A gospel of grace cannot be preached to someone who has not

heard that God requires obedience and punishes disobedience.

For lack of this teaching, a casual light-heartedness, with little

attention to the seriousness of sin, had become commonplace

among evangelicals. Such conditions were not new to church

history, but the old term for the phenomenon had long been

forgotten. MacArthur revived the right word: 'No-lordship

theology is classic Antinomianism [anti-nomos = anti-law].

There is no way around that faci 3

" New Testament Commentary, Matthew 1-7, p. 272. See also pp. 253-9.

18 The Gospel According to the Apostles, p. 96.

124 JOHN MacArTHUuR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

The problem is that most people do not think of God as someone to be feared. They don't realize that He hates

the proud and punishes evildoers. They presume on His

grace. They fear what people think more than they care what God thinks.!"

MacArthur was no less going against a popular trend when he

spoke against the teaching behind the Charismatic movement.

Most evangelicals took the view that, whatever the differences,

this was no subject for controversy. And many thought it would

take time to judge whether the movement was beneficial or

otherwise.

MacArthur, on the contrary, believed that the teaching of

Scripture was enough to give a sound judgment on the subject.

He also knew that the distinctives of charismatic belief were not

new to the twentieth century. They have appeared at a number

of times in the course of church history, always bringing short-

term excitement and ultimate confusion. Charismatic thinking

was advancing because contemporary evangelicalism was indif-

ferent to the history of the church:

Old certainties are often met with automatic suspicion just because they have been affirmed by generation after generation of evangelicals. These days it is fashionable to question everything."°

The nub of MacArthur's warning was that charismatic think-

ing was teaching people to look to the extraordinary and the

sensational instead of to the Word of God. By the contemporary

claim of supposed revelatory gifts, the finality of God speaking

MacArthur, The Vanishing Conscience (Nashville: Nelson, 1995). p:

100.

°° The Truth War, p. 144.

Controversy 125

in Scripture was being undermined. In many circles 'experience'

was being placed above truth, emotion above thought, and the

consequence was little careful regard for the teaching of the

New Testament. In addition to Charismatic Chaos, several of

MacArthur's most important titles major on this danger."!

whe

What these controversies confirmed to MacArthur was that

the beliefs many evangelicals accepted or avoided were deter-

mined too largely by influences other than Scripture. To be

passionate about truth was ceasing to be a mark of Christian

character. A. W. Tozer had noted this ethos before his death in

1963:

The fashion now is to tolerate anything lest we get the reputation of being intolerant. The tender-minded saints cannot bear to see Agag slain, so they choose rather to

sacrifice the health of the Church for years to come by sparing error and evil; and this they do in the name of Christian love."

MacArthur was grieved at the number of preachers who

adopted a 'code of silence' when 'contentious issues' were

raised. Their comment was, "We are committed to keeping

peace among brethren and unity in the body of Christ.' 'I was

astonished', he wrote, 'to realize how many Christians think the

Charismatic movement lacks biblical support, but are reluctant

to say so aloud.'

*! Particularly the titles, Reckless Faith and The Truth War. 2-7. L. Snyder, In Pursuit of God: The Life of A. W. Tozer (Camp Hill, PA: Christian Publications, 1991), p. 128.

126 JOHN MacArTHUuR: SERVANT OF THE WORD AND FLOCK

Take an uncompromising stance on almost any doctrinal or

biblical issue, and a chorus of voices will call you obstinate, unkind, heartless, contentious, or unloving, no matter how

irenically you frame your argument."°

At the same time, if there has to be controversy, he insists it

be without 'abusive, spiteful, or venomous behaviour towards

others'."* "Controversy frankly is distasteful to me. Those who know me personally will affirm that I do not enjoy any kind

of dispute."° There is also, he warns, the permanent need for

humility:

We do indeed need to exercise caution in making judgments about the gravity of someone else's error. We must never judge superficially. We need to remember that we

are indeed prone to misjudgments and errors of our own. 'We all stumble in many things' (James 3:2).

But whether or not to 'contend earnestly for the faith' is

simply not an option. A faithful pastor has to warn and guide.

He has to be negative as well as positive. He cannot leave the

field to others. Some have disparaged MacArthur's writings as 'books for untrained laymen', as though Christians at the pew

level are not of first importance. His comment on that kind of

observation is relevant:

Doctrine is not the exclusive domain of seminary profes-

sors. All true Christians must be concerned with understanding sound doctrine . . . Doctrine forms the belief system that controls and compels behaviour.'

'It is exceedingly difficult in these times', wrote Spurgeon, 'to

3 Reckless Faith, p. 46. * Reckless Faith, p. 107. * Ashamed of the Gospel, p. xx. * The Gospel According to the Apostles, p. 22.

Controversy 127

preserve one's fidelity towards God and one's fraternity among

men. Should not the former be preferred to the latter if both

cannot be maintained? We think so."'" To which quotation John

MacArthur adds another from the same preacher:

What have you and I to do with maintaining our influence

and position at the expense of truth? It is never right to do

a little wrong to obtain the greatest possible good . . . Your duty is to do the right: consequences are with God."*

27 C. H. Spurgeon, The Sword and the Trowel (London: Passmore & Alabaster, 1887), p. 196.

28 Grace to You letter, February 1995.

↑ Back to top