is to be preferred to the others, for it keeps closer to the words
CHAP. XV.] IGNORANCE OF -WORDS AND THRASES. 49 either a word or an idiom, of which the reader is ignorant, brings him to a stop. Xow if these belong to foreign tongues, we must either make inquiry about them from men who speak those tongues, or if we have leisure wx must learn the tongues ourselves, or we must consult and compare several translators. If, however, there are words or idioms in our own tongue that we are unacquainted wdth, we gradually come to know them through being accustomed to read or to hear them. There is nothing that it is better to commit to memory than those kinds of words and phrases whose meaning we do not know, so that where we happen to meet either with a more learned man of whom we can inquire, or with a passage that shows, either by the preceding or succeeding context, or by both, the force and significance of the phrase we are ignorant of, we can easily by the help of our memory turn our attention to the matter and learn all about it. So great, however, is the force of custom, even in regard to learning, that those who have been in a sort of way nurtured and brought up on the study of Holy Scripture, are surprised at other forms of speech, and think them less pure Latin than those which they have learnt from Scripture, but which are not to be found in Latin authors. In this matter, too, the great number of the translators proves a very great assistance, if they are examined and discussed with a careful comparison of their texts. Only all positive error must be removed. For those who are anxious to know the Scriptures ought in the first place to use their skill in the correction of the texts, so that the uncorrected ones should give way to the corrected, at least w^hen they are copies of the same translation.
Chap. xv.—Among versions a preference is given to the Septuaghit and the
Itala.
22. Xow among translations themselves the Italian {Itala)^ is to be preferred to the others, for it keeps closer to the words without prejudice to clearness of expression. And to correct the Latin we must use the Greek versions, among which the authority of the Septuagint is pre-eminent as far as the Old'
The translation here referred to is the Vetus Latlna, as revised by the Church of Northern Italy in the fourth century, prior to the final recension of Jerome, commonly called the Vulgate.
CHE. DOCT. D
50 ox CIinT=^TTAN DOCTRIXE. [f-OOK II.
Testament is concerned ; for it is reported through all the more learned churches tliat the seventy translators enjoyed so much of tlie presence and power of the Holy Spirit in tlieir work of translation, that among that numher of men there was but one voice. And if, as is reported, and as many not unworthy of confidence assert,^ they were separated during the work of translation, each man being in a cell by himself, and yet nothing was found in the manuscript of any one of them that was not found in the same words and in the same order of words in all the rest, who dares put anything in comparison with an authority like this, not to speak of preferring anything to it ? And even if they conferred together with the result that a unanimous agreement sprang out of the common labour and judgment of them all ; even so, it would not be right or becoming for any one man, whatever his experience, to aspire to coiTCct the unanimous opinion of many venerable and learned men. Wherefore, even if anythincr is found in the oriojinal Hebrew in a different form from that in which these men have expressed it, I think we must give way to the dispensation of Providence which used these men to bring it about, that books which the Jewish race were unwilling, either from religious scruple or from jealousy, to make known to other nations, were, with the assistance of the power of King Ptolemy, made known so long beforehand to the nations which in the future were to believe in the Lord. And thus it is possible that they translated in such a way as the Holy Spirit, who worked in them and had given them all one voice, thought most suitable for the Gentiles. But nevertheless, as I said above, a comparison of those translators also who have kept most closely to the words, is often not witliout value as a help to the clearing up of the meaning. Tlie Latin texts, therefore, of the Old Testament are, as I was about to say, to be corrected if necessary by the authority of the
Greeks, and especially by that of those who, though they were seventy in number, are said to have translated as with one voice. As to the books of the Now Testament, again, if any perplexity arises from the diversities of the Latin texts, wo
' Among these nre Justin Martyr, Irenanis, ami Clomons Aloxandrinus. Comp.
Augustine, Dc Civ. Dii, win. 43, an<l Ei>p. 71 ami 75.