English Christian Web Book
Clement of Alexandria: A Study in Christian Platonism and Gnosticism
Salvatore R. C. Lilla

About this book
Clement of Alexandria as a Christian Platonist, by Salvatore R. C. Lilla.
Author: Salvatore R. C. Lilla
- 77 chapters
- 124 PDF pages
- 107,985 words
- ≈ 831 min read
- English
🔍 Search this book
Ctrl K
Table of Contents
1tion of the proofs.
pp. 3–3 · ≈ 2 min2Rome, March 1971
pp. 3–3 · ≈ 2 min3Rome, March 1971
pp. 3–3 · ≈ 2 min4Rome, March 1971
pp. 3–3 · ≈ 2 min55. The Doctrine of t
pp. 3–6 · ≈ 10 min6Proclus, In Platonis Timaeum, ed.
pp. 7–9 · ≈ 16 min7to conclude that Philo is a direct source for Clement. Clement is conscious of no
pp. 10–10 · ≈ 6 min8Ritter nor Merk has worked out these true remarks. Even the parallels produced
pp. 10–11 · ≈ 9 min9134-6; H. Schiirmann, 15-16 and 27-32; E. Beppe re 4s H.es
pp. 12–12 · ≈ 8 min10on Moses;
pp. 13–13 · ≈ 5 min11explanation as suggeste
pp. 13–13 · ≈ 5 min12What, however, is more i
pp. 13–13 · ≈ 5 min13Goa, i ae ee
pp. 13–17 · ≈ 27 min14Spermatikos,
pp. 18–21 · ≈ 25 min15prophets who were able to attain a partial knowledge of the
pp. 22–22 · ≈ 5 min16plagiarism of the Greeks from Scripture. The views 0 a
pp. 22–26 · ≈ 27 min17dependent on the Barbarians. Clement openly maintains that
pp. 27–34 · ≈ 42 min18those who want to bec
pp. 35–36 · ≈ 10 min19on Stoicism? or to point out their Christian character which,
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min20as I know, no comprehensive inquiry has been undertaken on
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min21background has influenced both the general structure of Clement's
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min22To these two definitions
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min23sage, which, though no
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min243. The doctrine of mdBos.
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min25cbirnd al doris Na
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min26trait of the perfect Christian or yywortxds.
pp. 37–42 · ≈ 33 min27four cardinal virtues (fpdvnats, dvipeia, cwppoadvy, and dicato-
pp. 43–44 · ≈ 11 min28but an equivalent ofthe definition of the practical dpdvnats given
pp. 45–48 · ≈ 23 min29Clement's ethics and psychology, namely the doctrine of 7d6os,
pp. 49–52 · ≈ 22 min30Adyos dpbds is extremely f
pp. 53–54 · ≈ 10 min31_ : he Passage is rightly refer
pp. 55–57 · ≈ 20 min32'aec. Tan
pp. 58–59 · ≈ 10 min33moreta.s Plotinus, at t
pp. 60–65 · ≈ 32 min34to sketch Cle a me nome oe Bastes
pp. 66–66 · ≈ 5 min35a scientific explanation of the words pistis and morevew which
pp. 66–66 · ≈ 5 min36OE the Swaniatiis:
pp. 67–67 · ≈ 5 min37serve that the definition of analysis given by Clement's source
pp. 68–72 · ≈ 26 min38These passages explain w
pp. 73–74 · ≈ 13 min39strictly religious
pp. 75–77 · ≈ 16 min401. esotericism; symbol
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min41Our examination of Clement's views on fistis and on its relations
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min42Our examination of Clement's views on fistis and on its relations
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min43Our examination of Clement's views on fistis and on its relations
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min44prehension and knowledge of the Christian doctrines which must
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min45stration' of Scripture. Only in this way is it possible, in Clement's
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min46which he calls also gnosis and which represents the ultimate aim
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min47esoteric character to the
pp. 79–85 · ≈ 41 min484 s aa Ralle
pp. 86–90 · ≈ 29 min494. An important part in
pp. 91–92 · ≈ 11 min50activity consists év 7@ del voeiv.? Oewpia and gnosis play there-
pp. 93–96 · ≈ 23 min51The sharp distinction drawn by Clement between the High
pp. 97–100 · ≈ 22 min52Gospel of Philip 119. 13-15 (p. 47):... and it is fitting for each
pp. 101–101 · ≈ 6 min53world, based on the
pp. 102–102 · ≈ 6 min54t Strom. iv. 3.
pp. 102–102 · ≈ 6 min55Strom. v. 71.
pp. 102–102 · ≈ 6 min56he is most probably under the influence of Philo, who had identified the puxpa
pp. 102–102 · ≈ 6 min57world which is orepedv by its own nature: év S¢ rH Koopoyovia TH
pp. 103–104 · ≈ 14 min58sensible objects as oxiacpa 70d pu) dvros: the ju) ov is obviously
pp. 105–105 · ≈ 7 min59Although Clement makes it clear
pp. 106–107 · ≈ 14 min60and also with the idae
pp. 108–112 · ≈ 31 min61éyorros Thy Yuyip Siaxoopety 7a Tdvra, SijKovcay bua rdvTwv...
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min62world, above spac
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min63words, he is
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min64words, he is
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min65words, he is
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min66words, he is
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min67highest divinity has already been observed by modern scholars.?
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min68It is, however, necessary to examine some points to which little
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min69He is very difficult to re
pp. 114–114 · ≈ 4 min70its origin in the first hypothesis of Plato's Parmenides and occurs
pp. 115–115 · ≈ 4 min713. Since, as we have seen (p. 207 above), the Logos as second
pp. 115–115 · ≈ 4 min72Attention should be paid to the following correspondences:
pp. 115–116 · ≈ 9 min73divinity is also ineffable. Noname, no word is sufficiently adequate
pp. 117–117 · ≈ 4 min74mie dpa oddé
pp. 117–122 · ≈ 30 min75systems and his 'eclecti
pp. 123–123 · ≈ 5 min76in ethics, in the theory ofpistis, in gnosis, in the question of the
pp. 123–123 · ≈ 5 min77since they, according to him, had been originated by the divine
pp. 123–124 · ≈ 7 min
pp. 3–3 · ≈ 2 min2Rome, March 1971
pp. 3–3 · ≈ 2 min3Rome, March 1971
pp. 3–3 · ≈ 2 min4Rome, March 1971
pp. 3–3 · ≈ 2 min55. The Doctrine of t
pp. 3–6 · ≈ 10 min6Proclus, In Platonis Timaeum, ed.
pp. 7–9 · ≈ 16 min7to conclude that Philo is a direct source for Clement. Clement is conscious of no
pp. 10–10 · ≈ 6 min8Ritter nor Merk has worked out these true remarks. Even the parallels produced
pp. 10–11 · ≈ 9 min9134-6; H. Schiirmann, 15-16 and 27-32; E. Beppe re 4s H.es
pp. 12–12 · ≈ 8 min10on Moses;
pp. 13–13 · ≈ 5 min11explanation as suggeste
pp. 13–13 · ≈ 5 min12What, however, is more i
pp. 13–13 · ≈ 5 min13Goa, i ae ee
pp. 13–17 · ≈ 27 min14Spermatikos,
pp. 18–21 · ≈ 25 min15prophets who were able to attain a partial knowledge of the
pp. 22–22 · ≈ 5 min16plagiarism of the Greeks from Scripture. The views 0 a
pp. 22–26 · ≈ 27 min17dependent on the Barbarians. Clement openly maintains that
pp. 27–34 · ≈ 42 min18those who want to bec
pp. 35–36 · ≈ 10 min19on Stoicism? or to point out their Christian character which,
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min20as I know, no comprehensive inquiry has been undertaken on
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min21background has influenced both the general structure of Clement's
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min22To these two definitions
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min23sage, which, though no
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min243. The doctrine of mdBos.
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min25cbirnd al doris Na
pp. 37–37 · ≈ 4 min26trait of the perfect Christian or yywortxds.
pp. 37–42 · ≈ 33 min27four cardinal virtues (fpdvnats, dvipeia, cwppoadvy, and dicato-
pp. 43–44 · ≈ 11 min28but an equivalent ofthe definition of the practical dpdvnats given
pp. 45–48 · ≈ 23 min29Clement's ethics and psychology, namely the doctrine of 7d6os,
pp. 49–52 · ≈ 22 min30Adyos dpbds is extremely f
pp. 53–54 · ≈ 10 min31_ : he Passage is rightly refer
pp. 55–57 · ≈ 20 min32'aec. Tan
pp. 58–59 · ≈ 10 min33moreta.s Plotinus, at t
pp. 60–65 · ≈ 32 min34to sketch Cle a me nome oe Bastes
pp. 66–66 · ≈ 5 min35a scientific explanation of the words pistis and morevew which
pp. 66–66 · ≈ 5 min36OE the Swaniatiis:
pp. 67–67 · ≈ 5 min37serve that the definition of analysis given by Clement's source
pp. 68–72 · ≈ 26 min38These passages explain w
pp. 73–74 · ≈ 13 min39strictly religious
pp. 75–77 · ≈ 16 min401. esotericism; symbol
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min41Our examination of Clement's views on fistis and on its relations
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min42Our examination of Clement's views on fistis and on its relations
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min43Our examination of Clement's views on fistis and on its relations
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min44prehension and knowledge of the Christian doctrines which must
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min45stration' of Scripture. Only in this way is it possible, in Clement's
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min46which he calls also gnosis and which represents the ultimate aim
pp. 78–78 · ≈ 5 min47esoteric character to the
pp. 79–85 · ≈ 41 min484 s aa Ralle
pp. 86–90 · ≈ 29 min494. An important part in
pp. 91–92 · ≈ 11 min50activity consists év 7@ del voeiv.? Oewpia and gnosis play there-
pp. 93–96 · ≈ 23 min51The sharp distinction drawn by Clement between the High
pp. 97–100 · ≈ 22 min52Gospel of Philip 119. 13-15 (p. 47):... and it is fitting for each
pp. 101–101 · ≈ 6 min53world, based on the
pp. 102–102 · ≈ 6 min54t Strom. iv. 3.
pp. 102–102 · ≈ 6 min55Strom. v. 71.
pp. 102–102 · ≈ 6 min56he is most probably under the influence of Philo, who had identified the puxpa
pp. 102–102 · ≈ 6 min57world which is orepedv by its own nature: év S¢ rH Koopoyovia TH
pp. 103–104 · ≈ 14 min58sensible objects as oxiacpa 70d pu) dvros: the ju) ov is obviously
pp. 105–105 · ≈ 7 min59Although Clement makes it clear
pp. 106–107 · ≈ 14 min60and also with the idae
pp. 108–112 · ≈ 31 min61éyorros Thy Yuyip Siaxoopety 7a Tdvra, SijKovcay bua rdvTwv...
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min62world, above spac
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min63words, he is
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min64words, he is
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min65words, he is
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min66words, he is
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min67highest divinity has already been observed by modern scholars.?
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min68It is, however, necessary to examine some points to which little
pp. 113–113 · ≈ 5 min69He is very difficult to re
pp. 114–114 · ≈ 4 min70its origin in the first hypothesis of Plato's Parmenides and occurs
pp. 115–115 · ≈ 4 min713. Since, as we have seen (p. 207 above), the Logos as second
pp. 115–115 · ≈ 4 min72Attention should be paid to the following correspondences:
pp. 115–116 · ≈ 9 min73divinity is also ineffable. Noname, no word is sufficiently adequate
pp. 117–117 · ≈ 4 min74mie dpa oddé
pp. 117–122 · ≈ 30 min75systems and his 'eclecti
pp. 123–123 · ≈ 5 min76in ethics, in the theory ofpistis, in gnosis, in the question of the
pp. 123–123 · ≈ 5 min77since they, according to him, had been originated by the divine
pp. 123–124 · ≈ 7 min
🔖 My bookmarks
Saved in this browser only. Tap 🔖 Bookmark while reading to add a chapter.
If you spot a typographic error from the PDF conversion, please tell us and quote the chapter title or page range.
