Chapter 588 of 1225

Bible Commentary (1871–1879 Edition)

Bible Commentary (1871–1879 Edition)

The Wisdom of this World, Foolishness, 1 CORINTHIAXS IV. Ho'n lo Esteem GocTs MinintfCrB.

God's—(ch. n. 3). God Is the ultimate end of all, even ol Christ, His co-equal Son (ch. 15. 28; Philipplans 2. 6-11). prtesthood (Malaohi 1.11; Matthew 18.20; 1 Peter 2. 5). [VlTniNGA.] 17. If any . . . dertle . . . tlestroy—rather, AH the Greek verb is the same in both cases, " destroy . . . destroy." God repays in kind l)y a righteous retaliation, fhe destroyer shall himself be destroyed. As temporal death was the penalty of marring the material temple

CHAPTER IV.

Ver. 1-21. True view of Ministers: the Judgment

IS NOT TO BE F'orestallbd; meanwhii.e the Apo-stles' LOW state Contrasts with the Corinthians' Party pride, not that St. Paul would shame them, but as A father WARN them ; FOR WHICH END HE SENT Tl.MOTHY, AND WILL SOON COME HIMSELF. 1. account . . . n8 —Paul and Apollos. ministers of Christ—not heads of the Church in whom ye are severally to glory (ch. 1. 12); the headship belongs to Christ alone; we are but His servants ministering to you (ch. 1.13; 3.5,22). stewards— (Luke 12. 42; 1 Peter 4. 10). Not the depositories of grace, but dispensers of it (" rightly dividing" or dispensing it), so far as God gives us it, to others. The Chazan, or over- (Leviticus 16, 2; Daniel .5.2,3,301,80 eternal death is the penalty of marring the spiritual temple—the Church. The destroyers here {v. 16, 17), are distinct from the unwise or nnskilful builders (v. 12, 15); the latter held fast the "foundation " (w. 11), and, therefore, though they lose their work of superstructure and the special reward, yet they are themselves saved ; the destroyers, on the contrary, assailed with false teaching the foundation, and so subvert the temple itself, and shall therefore be destroyed. (See Note, V. 10.) [EsTiDSand Neander.] I think St. Paul passes here from the teachers to all the members of the Church, who, by profession, are "priests unto God " (Exodus 19. 6; 1 Peter 2. 9; Revelation 1.6). As the Aaronic priests were doomed to die if they violated the old temple (Exodus 28. seer, in the synagogue answered lo the bishop or "angel" of the Church, who called seven of the synagogue to read the law every sabbath, and oversaw them. The Parnasin of the synagogue, like the ancient "deacon" of the Church, took care of the poor (Acts 6.), and subsequently preached

43), so any Christian who violates the sanctity of the gp'ritual temple, shall perish eternally (Hebrews 12. 14; 10.

36, 31). holy—inviolable (Habakkuk 2. 20). whlcH temple ye are—rather, " the which (i. e., holy) are ye" [Alford], and, therefore, want of holiness on tlie part of any of you in subordination to the prestyters or bishops, as Stephen and Philip did. The Church is not the appendage to tho priestliood; but the minister is the steward of God to the. Church. Man shrinks from too close contact with God, hence he willingly puts a priesthood between, and would serve God by deputy. The Pagan (like the modern Romish) priest was rather to conceal than to explain "the mysteries of God." The minister's office is to " preach" (or, as EsTitjs, "to tamper with the fonndation in teadiing yon ") is a violation of the temple, which cannot be let to pass with impunity. Grotius supports Unr/lish Version. 18. scemetli—£. e., i.?, anri z's rcgifirrfed by himself and others, wise In this world— wise in mere worldly wisdom (ch. 1.

20). let him become a fool—by receiving the Gospel in (Hi., proclaim as a herald, Matthew 10. 27) the deep truths of God ("mysteries," heavenly truths, only known by revelation), so far as they have been revealed, and so far aa his heai'ers are disposed to receive them. Josephus says, the Jewish religion made known to all the people the mysteries of their religion, whilst the Pagans concealed from all but the "initiated" few, the mysteries of theirs. 3. Moreover— The oldest MSS. read, "Moreover here"

Its unworldly simplicity, and nohpcoming a fool in the world's sight. [Alford.] Let him no longer think himself wise, bat seek the true wisdom from God, l)ringing his undei-standing into captivity to the obedience of faith. [Es-

TITJS.] 19. with God in the judgment o/God. It Is written —in Job 5. 18. The formula of quoting Scripture used here, establishes the canonicityof Job. He talceth . . . wise In . . . own craftiness—proving the "foolishness" of the world's wisdom, since it is made by God the very Bnare to catch those who think themselves so wise. Lit., He who Uiketh , Ac, the whole of the sentence not being quoted, but only tiie part which suited St. Paul's purpose. 80. Quotation from Psalm 91. 11. There it is of men; here ((. e., on earth). The contrast thus is between man's usage as to stewards (v. 2), and God's way (v. 3). Though 7iere below, in the case of stewards, inquiry is made, that one man be found (i. e., proved to he) faithful : yet God's steward awaits no such judgment of man, in man's day, but the Lord's judgment in His great day. Another argument against the Corinthians lor their partial preferences of certain teachers for their gifts: whereas what God requires in His stewards is faithfulness (1 Samuel 3.20; Hebrews 3. 5; Margin); as indeed is required in earthly stewards, but with this dil Terence (f. 3), tliat God's stewards await not man's judgment to test them, but the testing whicli shall be in the day of the Lord. 3. it is a very small tltiug lit., " it amounts to a very small matter;" not that It is "of the wise." St. Paul by inspiration states theclass of men whose " thoughts " (or rather, " reasonings," as suits the Greek and the sense of the context) the Spiritdesignated In the Psalm, "vanity," viz., the "proud" (r. 2) and worldly-wise, whom God in v. 8 calls " fools," though they "boast themselves" of their »('i«(io»i in pushing their Interests («. 4). 31. let no man glory In men—resuming the subject from v. 4; ef. ch. 1. 12 and 31, where the true object of glorying is stated : " he thatglorieth lethimglory

In THE Lord." Also ch. 4.6, "Thatnoone of you be puffed np for one against another." For all things—not only

I despise yoMr judgment, but as compared with God's, it almost comes to nothing, juflgcd ... of man's Judgment—iii., "man's (/n," contrasted witli the day (ch. 3. ail men. For j'ou to glory thus in men, is lowering yourselves from your high position as heirs of all things. All men (including your teachers) belongto Chiist. and there-

13) of the Lord (i'. 5; 1 Tliessalonians 5.4). "The day of man" is here put before us as & person. [Wahl.] All days previous to the day of the Lord are man's days. Emesti fore to yon, by your union with Hitn ; He makes Ihem and all things work together for your good (Uomans 8. 2>!). Ye arc not for the sake of them, but they for the sake of you;ra)i«i(/^t'« the thrice recurring Greek tor judged . . .judge. . . judgeth (v. 4), thus: To me for iny part (though capable of being found faithful) it is a very small matter that (2 Corinthians 4. 5, 15). Tliey belong to you, not you to them. Enumeration of sotne of the " all things." The teachers, in whom they gloried, he puts first (ch. 1. 12). He omits after " Ci-phas " or Christ (to whom exclusively some at Corintli (ch. 1. 12) professed to belong); but, instead, substitutes "ye are Christ's" (v. 23). world . . . life . . . death . . . thing* prritent . , . thing* to come—not r>nly Bhall ihcy not "separate you from the love of God in Christ" (Romans 8. 38, 39), l)ut they "all are yours," £. e., are for you (Romans 8. 28), and i>elong to you, as tliey beong to Clirist your Head (Hel)rews 1. 2). things |>r<-Keiit —"things ocitaHy present." [AlFO>II).] '43. ye arc Christ's —not I'aul's, or Apollos", or Cephao' (ch. 11, '! ; Matt hew i!3.

1 sliould be approved of hy man's judgment ; yea, I do not even assume the right ofjudgment and a/i/iroving myself but He that has the rigid, and is able lo judge on my case (the Dijudicator), is the Lord. 4. I>y myself—^7a/i.sta/e, " I am conscious to myself of no (ministerial) uiifaitlifulne.ss." Bengel explains tlie Greek compound, " to decide in judgments on one in relation tootliers," not simply to judge, am I not liereby Justified-Therefore conscience is not an infallible guide. Kt. Paul did not consider his so. This ver.se is directly against tlie judicial power claimed by the priests of Rome. 5. l)isproving Llic judicial power claimed l)y the Romish priesthood in the confessional. Tliereforc—as tlie Lord is the sole Decider or Dijuilicator. Judge—not tlie same Greek word as in v. 3, 4, where the meaning is to approve of, or dccideun, the merits ot oue'» m i-lO). " Neither be ye called masters ; for one is your Master, even Christ" (Romans 14. 8). Not merely a piulicular section of yju. but ye yll are Christ's ;ch. 1. 12). Christ Is

↑ Back to top

↑