Chapter 6
Sources of Citations
Chapter 1
Page 2
José Ortega y Gasset, ‘El origen deportivo del estado.’ Citius, Altius, Fortius, 9, no. 1–4 (1967): 259–276; quotes at pp. 259–260.
Page 2
Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions. New York: Crown Publishers, 1954, pp. 41–42.
Page 3
Robert Jastrow, God and the Astronomers. New York: Norton, 1978, pp. 115–116.
Page 5
Stephen Jay Gould, ‘Nonmoral Nature.’ Natural History, 91 (1982): 19–26.
Page 10
Stephen Jay Gould, ‘Nonmoral Nature.’ Natural History, 91 (1982): 19–26.
Page 12
Ted Peters, ‘Science and Religion: Ten Models of War, Truce, and Partnership.’ Theology and Science, 16, no. 1 (2018): 11–53.
Page 12
C. A. Coulson, Christianity in an Age of Science. London: Oxford University Press, 1953, pp. 19–21.
Page 14
Werner Heisenberg, Physik und Philosophie. Stuttgart: Hirzel, 2007, p. 85.
Page 14
Mary Midgley, Wisdom, Information, and Wonder: What Is Knowledge For? London: Routledge, 1995, p. 199.
Page 16
John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, I.x.1.
Chapter 2
Page 20
John Hedley Brooke, Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, p. 6.
Page 21
Peter Harrison, ‘Introduction,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion, edited by Peter Harrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 1–18.
Page 22
Thomas Dixon, Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 9.
Page 22
Colin A. Russell, ‘The Conflict Metaphor and its Social Origins.’ Science and Christian Belief, 1 (1989): 3–26.
Page 24
Peter Harrison, The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015, p. 19.
Page 24
Jerry A. Coyne, Faith vs. Fact: Why Science and Religion are Incompatible. New York: Viking, 2015, p. xii.
Page 27
This comment is taken from Wilberforce’s review of The Origin of Species, published in The Quarterly Review, 108 (July 1860): 225–264.
Page 28
Charles Darwin to Joseph Hooker, 20(?) July 1860; Francis Darwin, ed. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (3 vols). London: John Murray, 1887, vol. 2, p. 234.
Page 28
Peter Harrison, The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 4–5.
Page 35
Cited in Richard J. Blackwell, Galileo, Bellarmine and the Bible. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991, pp. 94–95.
Page 36
Cited in Richard J. Blackwell, Galileo, Bellarmine and the Bible. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991, p. 95.
Page 37
Cited in Owen Chadwick, From Bossuet to Newman: The Idea of Doctrinal Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957, p. 20.
Page 43
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray, 1859, p. 1.
Page 46
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray, 1859, p. 171.
Page 47
Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design. New York: W. W. Norton, 1986, p. 5.
Page 48
Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man. London: John Murray, 1871, p. 405.
Page 51
Svante Arrhenius, Worlds in the Making: The Evolution of the Universe. New York: Harper, 1908, p. xiv.
Page 53
F. J. Tipler, C. J. S. Clarke, and G. F. R. Ellis, ‘Singularities and Horizons – A Review Article,’ in General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years after the Birth of Albert Einstein, edited by A. Held. New York: Plenum Press, 1980, pp. 97–206; the Weinberg quote is at p. 110.
Chapter 3
Page 58
Michael Devitt, Realism and Truth, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997, p. 114.
Page 59
John Polkinghorne, One World: The Interaction of Science and Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986, p. 22.
Page 59
Michael Redhead, From Physics to Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 9.
Page 60
William James, Essays in Radical Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976, p. 21.
Page 60
N. T. Wright, The New Testament and the People of God. London: SPCK, 1992, p. 35.
Page 63
Ernest Nagel, The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979, p. 129.
Page 63
Bas C. van Fraassen, The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980, pp. 202–203.
Page 63
Nicolas Copernicus, de revolutionibus orbium coelestium libri vi. Nuremberg, 1543, praefatio.
Page 64
Don Cupitt, Only Human. London: SCM Press, 1985, p. 9.
Page 65
John Polkinghorne, Belief in God in an Age of Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998, p. 104.
Page 65
John Polkinghorne, Belief in God in an Age of Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998, pp. 105–106.
Page 66
Werner Heisenberg, Physik und Philosophie. Stuttgart: Hirzel, 2007, p. 85.
Page 66
Steven Rose, ‘The Biology of the Future and the Future of Biology,’ in Explanations: Styles of Explanation in Science, edited by John Cornwell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 125–142; quote at pp. 128–129.
Page 67
Thomas F. Torrance, Theological Science. London: Oxford University Press, 1969, p. 281.
Page 68
Thomas F. Torrance, Theology in Reconstruction. London: SCM Press, 1965, p. 9.
Page 68
John Polkinghorne, Belief in God in an Age of Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998, pp. 105–106.
Page 68
H. Wheeler Robinson, ‘Hebrew Psychology,’ in A. S. Peake, ed., The People and the Book. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925, p. 362.
Page 71
Peter R. Dear, The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006, p. 173.
Page 71
Max Planck, Where Is Science Going? New York: W.W. Norton, 1932, p. 173.
Page 71
John Polkinghorne, Theology in the Context of Science. London: SPCK, 2008, p. xx.
Page 71
William Whewell, Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences (2 vols). London: John W. Parker, 1847, vol. 2, p. 46.
Page 72
Wesley C. Salmon, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984, p. 260.
Page 72
Philip Kitcher, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World,’ in Scientific Explanation, edited by P. Kitcher and W. Salmon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989, pp. 410–505; quote at p. 432.
Page 72
Pierre Duhem, La théorie physique: son object, sa structure, 2nd ed. Paris: Rivière, 1914, pp. 3–4.
Page 73
Alvin Plantinga, Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 370.
Page 73
Keith E. Yandell, Philosophy of Religion: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 16.
Page 73
Richard Swinburne, Is There a God? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, p. 68.
Page 74
Thomas Nagel, ‘Why Is There Anything?’ in Secular Philosophy and the Religious Temperament: Essays, 2002–2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 27–32; quote at p. 28.
Page 73
William Whewell, On the Philosophy of Discovery. London: Parker, 1860, p. 359.
Page 73
Johann Kepler, Gesammelte Werke (22 vols). Munich: C. H. Beck, 1937–1983, vol. 6, p. 233.
Page 80
Gilbert Harman, ‘The Inference to the Best Explanation.’ Philosophical Review, 74 (1965): 88–95; quote at p. 89.
Page 82
Charles Darwin, Origin of Species, 6th ed. London: John Murray, 1872, p. 421.
Page 83
Richard Swinburne, The Existence of God, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004, p. 165.
Page 86
Karl R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge, 2002, p. 18.
Page 87
William Whewell, Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences (2 vols). London: John W. Parker, 1847, vol. 1, p. 42.
Page 90
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962, p. 149.
Page 90
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962, p. 122.
Page 90
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, p. 15.
Chapter 4
Page 96
Max Planck, Where Is Science Going? New York: W.W. Norton, 1932, p. 214.
Page 98
Thomas H. Huxley, in Francis Darwin, ed. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (3 vols). London: John Murray, 1887, vol. 2, p. 200.
Page 98
Richard Dawkins, A Devil’s Chaplain: Selected Writings. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2003, p. 81.
Page 103
William Lane Craig and Quentin Smith, Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, p. 63.
Page 105
William Paley, Natural Theology: Or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, 12th ed. London: Faulder, 1809, p. 1.
Page 105
William Paley, Natural Theology: Or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, 12th ed. London: Faulder, 1809, p. 3.
Page 106
William Paley, Natural Theology: Or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, 12th ed. London: Faulder, 1809, p. 378.
Page 106
William Paley, Natural Theology: Or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, 12th ed. London: Faulder, 1809, pp. 18–19.
Page 107
David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. New York: Penguin, 1990, p. 79.
Page 108
Charles Kingsley, ‘The Natural Theology of the Future,’ in Westminster Sermons. London: Macmillan, 1874, pp. v–xxxiii.
Page 108
Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design. London: Penguin, 1988, p. 5.
Page 108
Alvin Plantinga, Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 14.
Page 108
Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 330.
Page 109
John Polkinghorne, Theology in the Context of Science. London: SPCK, 2008, pp. 84–86.
Page 110
Laurence Bonjour and Ernest Sosa, Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, p. 174 (emphasis in original).
Page 110
Stanley Fish, ‘Evidence in Science and Religion, Part Two.’ New York Times, 9 April 2012.
Page 111
David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. New York: Penguin, 1990, p. 79.
Page 113
Augustine of Hippo, De Genesi ad litteram, IX.17.
Page 115
Aubrey Moore, ‘The Christian Doctrine of God,’ in Lux Mundi: A Series of Studies in the Religion of the Incarnation, edited by Charles Gore. London: John Murray, 1890, pp. 57–109; quote at p. 99.
Page 117
Ian G. Barbour, Religion in an Age of Science. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1990, p. 29.
Page 117
Ian G. Barbour, Religion in an Age of Science. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1990, p. 224.
Page 119
Robert John Russell, ‘Divine Action and Quantum Mechanics: A Fresh Assessment,’ in Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Robert John Russell et al. Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 2001, pp. 293–328; quote at p. 295.
Page 120
Newton, cited in Richard Westfall, Science and Religion in Seventeenth Century England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970, pp. 203–204.
Page 121
David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007, p. 62.
Page 121
Paul Davies, The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005, p. 81.
Page 122
Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions. New York: Crown Publishers, 1954, pp. 47–48.
Page 122
Albert Einstein, letter to Cornelius Lanczos, 12 March 1942; in H. Dukas and B. Hoffmann, eds., Albert Einstein: The Human Side. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979, p. 68.
Page 123
Paul Davies, The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005, p. 86.
Page 123
F. R. Tennant, Miracle and Its Philosophical Presuppositions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925, p. 33.
Page 123
Keith Ward, Divine Action. London: Collins, 1990, p. 196.
Page 123
Keith Ward, Divine Action. London: Collins, 1990, pp. 177–178.
Page 124
Keith Ward, ‘Believing in Miracles.’ Zygon, 37, no. 3 (2002), 741–750; quote at p. 743.
Page 124
Keith Ward, ‘Believing in Miracles.’ Zygon, 37, no. 3 (2002), 741–750; quote at p. 746.
Page 125
Wolfhart Pannenberg, ‘The Concept of Miracle.’ Zygon, 37, no. 3 (2002), 759–762; quote at p. 761.
Page 126
Daniel C. Dennett, Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Viking Penguin, 2006, p. 9.
Page 127
Janet Radcliffe‐Richards, Human Nature after Darwin: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge, 2000, p. 180.
Page 128
G. K. Chesterton, The Everlasting Man. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1993, p. 105.
Page 128
José Ortega y Gasset, ‘El origen deportivo del estado.’ Citius, Altius, Fortius, 9, no. 1–4 (1967): 259–276.
Page 129
Joseph Addison, ‘Ode’, in Christopher Ricks, ed., The Oxford Book of English Verse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 246.
Page 131
John Polkinghorne, One World: The Interaction of Faith and Science. London: SPCK, 1986, p. 36.
Page 131
For what follows, see John Polkinghorne, ‘The New Natural Theology.’ Studies in World Christianity, 1, no. 1 (1995): 43–44.
Page 132
John Keats, Complete Poems, 3rd ed. London: Penguin, 1988, p. 395.
Page 133
John Polkinghorne, ‘The New Natural Theology’. Studies in World Christianity, 1, no. 1 (1995): 41–50; quote at p. 43.
Page 134
Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy. London: Oxford University Press, 1912, p. 99.
Page 134
Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy. London: Oxford University Press, 1912, p. 98.
Page 134
Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1946, pp. 673–674.
Page 135
Michael B. Foster, ‘The Christian Doctrine of Creation and the Rise of Modern Science.’ Mind, 43 (1934): 446–468.
Page 135
Michael B. Foster, ‘Christian Theology and Modern Science of Nature (II).’ Mind, 45 (1936): 1–27; quote at pp. 14–15.
Page 135
Michael B. Foster, ‘Greek and Christian Ideas of Nature.’ The Free University Quarterly, 6 (1959): 122–127; quote at pp. 123–124 (emphasis in original).
Chapter 5
Page 143
Ernan McMullin, ‘A Case for Scientific Realism,’ in Scientific Realism, edited by Jarrett Leplin. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984, pp. 8–40; quote at pp. 26–27.
Page 144
Peter Godfrey‐Smith, ‘Theories and Models in Metaphysics.’ Harvard Review of Philosophy, 14 (2006): 4–19; quote at p. 7.
Page 144
William James, The Will to Believe, and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979, p. 67.
Page 145
Daniela M. Bailer‐Jones, Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013, p. 206.
Page 145
Daniela M. Bailer‐Jones, Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013, p. 111.
Page 145
Daniela M. Bailer‐Jones, ‘Scientists' Thoughts on Scientific Models.’ Perspectives on Science, 10, no. 3 (2002): 275–301; quote at p. 284.
Page 146
Daniela M. Bailer‐Jones, ‘Scientists' Thoughts on Scientific Models.’ Perspectives on Science, 10, no. 3 (2002): 291.
Page 147
Rutherford, cited in E. N. da C. Andrade, Rutherford and the Nature of the Atom. London: Heinemann, 1965, p. 111.
Page 154
Marta Spranzi, ‘Galileo and the Mountains of the Moon: Analogical Reasoning, Models and Metaphors in Scientific Discovery.’ Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, no. 3–4 (2004): 451–483, especially p. 461.
Page 154
Marta Spranzi, ‘Galileo and the Mountains of the Moon,’ Analogical Reasoning, Models and Metaphors in Scientific Discovery.’ Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, no. 3–4 (2004): 451–483, pp. 466–467.
Page 155
Galileo Galilei, Sidereus Nunceus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989, p. 41.
Page 156
Charles Darwin. Origin of Species, 6th ed. London: John Murray, 1866, pp. 91–92.
Page 158
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan. London: Andrew Crooke, 1651, p. 28.
Page 161
Ian T. Ramsey, Models and Mystery. London: Oxford University Press, 1964, p. 1.
Page 162
Arthur Peacocke, Paths from Science Towards God: The End of All Our Exploring. Oxford: Oneworld, 2001, p. 9.
Page 162
Arthur Peacocke, Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming Divine and Human. London: SCM Press, 1993, p. 14.
Page 163
Arthur Peacocke, ‘Science and the Future of Theology: Critical Issues.’ Zygon, 35 (2000): 119–40.
Page 164
Sallie McFague, Speaking in Parables: A Study in Metaphor and Theology. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1975, p. 29.
Page 164
Sallie McFague, Metaphorical Theology: Models of God in Religious Language. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985, p. 28.
Page 169
Werner Heisenberg, Die Ordnung der Wirklichkeit. Munich: Piper Verlag, 1989, p. 44.
Page 170
Richard Dawkins, A Devil’s Chaplain: Selected Writings. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2003, p. 19.
Page 170
Cited in Max Jammer, Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 125–127.
Page 171
Augustine, Sermo, 117.3.5.
Page 171
Charles Gore, The Incarnation of the Son of God. London: John Murray, 1922, pp. 105–106.
Page 172
Max Planck, Where is Science Going? New York: W.W. Norton, 1932, p. 217.
Page 172
Thomas G. Weinandy, Does God Suffer? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2000, p. 32.
Page 173
Wood, William. ‘Modeling Mystery.’ Scientia et Fides, 4, no. 1 (2016): 39–59; quote at p. 43.
Page 173
Peter Godfrey‐Smith, ‘Metaphysics and the Philosophical Imagination.’ Philosophical Studies, 160 (2012): 97–113; quote at p. 98.
Page 174
Janet Martin Soskice, Metaphor and Religious Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985, p. 55.
Page 174
Ian Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms. New York: Harper & Row, 1974, pp. 6–7.
Page 175
Ian Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms. New York: Harper & Row, 1974, p. 7.
Chapter 6
Page 180
Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions. New York: Crown Publishers, 1954, p. 152.
Page 180
Albert Einstein, Ideas and Opinions. New York: Crown Publishers, 1954, pp. 41–42.
Page 181
Thomas H. Huxley, Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays. London: Macmillan, 1905, pp. 46–116.
Page 181
Thomas H. Huxley, Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays. London: Macmillan, 1905, p. 53.
Page 181
Thomas H. Huxley, Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays. London: Macmillan, 1905, pp. 81–82.
Page 182
E. O. Wilson, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000, p. 562.
Page 182
Richard D. Alexander, Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1979, p. 20.
Page 183
Sam Harris, The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York: Free Press, 2010, p. 19.
Page 183
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2010/04/about‐sam‐harris‐claim‐that‐science‐can.html
Page 183
Massimo Pigliucci, ‘New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 37, no. 1 (2013): 142–153; quote at p. 144.
Page 184
George Ellis, ‘Can Science Bridge the Is–Ought Gap? A Response to Michael Shermer.’ Theology and Science, 16, no. 1 (2018): 1–5, especially pp. 3–4.
Page 184
Whitley R. P. Kaufman, ‘Can Science Determine Moral Values? A Reply to Sam Harris.’ Neuroethics, 5 (2012): 55–65; quote at p. 59.
Page 184
Whitley R. P. Kaufman, ‘Can Science Determine Moral Values? A Reply to Sam Harris.’ Neuroethics, 5 (2012): 55–65; quote at p. 59.
Page 185
Richard Lewontin, review of Carl Sagan, The Demon–Haunted World, in the New York Review of Books, 9 January 1997.
Page 186
Alexander Rosenberg, The Atheist’s Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life without Illusions. New York: W.W. Norton, 2011, pp. 7–8.
Page 186
Alexander Rosenberg, The Atheist’s Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life without Illusions. New York: W.W. Norton, 2011, p. 92.
Page 187
Eugenie C. Scott, ‘Darwin Prosecuted: Review of Johnson’s Darwin on Trial.’ Creation/Evolution Journal, 13, no. 2 (1993): 36–47; quote at p. 43 (emphasis in original).
Page 187
Ernan McMullin, ‘Plantinga’s Defense of Special Creation,’ Christian Scholar’s Review, 21, no. 1 (1991): 168.
Page 187
Ernan McMullin, ‘Varieties of Methodological Naturalism,’ in The Nature of Nature: Examining the Role of Naturalism in Science, edited by Bruce L. Gordon and William A Dembski. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2011, p. 83.
Page 187
Ian James Kidd, ‘Doing Science an Injustice: Midgley on Scientism,’ in Science and the Self: Animals, Evolution, and Ethics: Essays in Honour of Mary Midgley, edited by Ian James Kidd and Liz McKinnell. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016, pp. 151–167.
Page 188
Edward H. Feser, Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae, 2014, pp. 10–11.
Page 188
Timothy Williamson, ‘What Is Naturalism?’ New York Times, 4 September 2011.
Page 188
Mary Midgley, Are You an Illusion? Durham: Acumen, 2014, p. 5.
Page 189
Mary Midgley, Wisdom, Information, and Wonder: What Is Knowledge For? London: Routledge, 1995, p. 199.
Page 189
Francis Darwin, ed., The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (3 vols). London: John Murray, 1887, vol. 2, p. 49.
Page 190
Bethany Sollereder, God, Evolution, and Animal Suffering. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 116–117.
Page 289
William Paley, Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, 12th ed. London: Faulder, 1809, p. 467.
Page 191
Holmes Rolston III, ‘Perpetual Perishing, Perpetual Renewal.’ Northern Review, no. 28 (2008), 111–123; quote at p. 111.
Page 191
Bethany Sollereder, God, Evolution, and Animal Suffering. London: Routledge, 2018, p. 117.
Page 192
Bethany Sollereder, God, Evolution, and Animal Suffering. London: Routledge, 2018, p. 185.
Page 192
Christopher Southgate, Theology in a Suffering World: Glory and Longing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 14–15.
Page 193
http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/values.html
Page 194
http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/future.pdf
Page 194
Victor C. Ferkiss, Technological Man: The Myth and the Reality. New York: New American Library, 1970, p. 34.
Page 196
Roger Scruton, The Face of God. London: Bloomsbury, 2014, p. 8.
Page 196
John Polkinghorne, Science and Creation: The Search for Understanding. London: SPCK, 1988, p. 20.
Page 197
Eugene Wigner, ‘The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics.’ Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13 (1960): 1–14.
Page 197
Albert Einstein, ‘Physics and Reality’ (1936); in Ideas and Opinions. New York: Crown Publishers, 1954, p. 292.
Page 198
Johann Kepler, Gesammelte Werke (22 vols). Munich: C. H. Beck, 1937–83, vol. 6, p. 233.
Page 198
Galileo Galilei, Opere (20 vols). Florence: G. Barbèra, 1929, vol. 6, p. 232.
Page 199
William Whewell, On the Philosophy of Discovery: Chapters Historical and Critical. London: John W. Parker, 1860, p. 359.
Page 214
Armin W. Geertz, ‘Brain, Body and Culture: A Biocultural Theory of Religion.’ Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 22, no. 4 (2010): 304–321; quote at p. 304.
Page 214
Justin Barrett, ‘Cognitive Science of Religion: What Is It and Why Is It?’ Religion Compass, 1 (2007): 1–19; quote at p. 1.
Page 215
Justin L. Barrett, Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2004, p. 31.
Page 216
Jonathan Jong, Christopher Kavanagh, and Aku Visala, ‘Born Idolaters: The Limits of the Philosophical Implications of the Cognitive Science of Religion.’ Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 57, no. 2 (2015): 244–266.
Page 217
Robert N. McCauley, ‘The Naturalness of Religion and the Unnaturalness of Science,’ in Explanation and Cognition, edited by F. Keil and R. Wilson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000, pp. 61–85; quote at pp. 69–70.