Chapter 12 of 12

Living Human Beings, the Martyrs

Living Human Beings, the Martyrs

Irenaeus of Lyons that is, towards God, you have lost at once both his art and life. For to create is the characteristic of the goodness of God; to be created is characteristic of the nature of the human. If, therefore, you offer to him what is yours, that is, faith in him and subjection, you will receive his art and become a perfect work of God. But if you do not believe in him, and flee from his Hands, the cause of imperfection will be in you who did not obey, and not in him who called you. For he sent messengers to call people to the feast; but those who did not obey deprived themselves of his royal banquet. (haer. 4.39.2–3; cf. Matt. 22:3)

For the handiwork to be fashioned to the stature of Christ, the truly living human being, rather than hardening himself, trying to be what he wants to be, he must remain pliable, open, and responsive to the creative work of God. As Denis Minns puts it: 'What the earth creature needs to learn above all is to relax in the Hands of God, to let God be the creator.'112

LIVING HUMAN BEINGS, THE MARTYRS

If it is the crucified and exalted Christ who is the starting point for expounding the economy of God, through the parallelism between Adam and Christ, and who brings the preliminary sketch to its fulfilment in himself as the living human being, no longer animated by a breath but vivified by the Spirit, then it is the martyrs, who have followed Christ on this path, who witness and manifest the power of God and are therefore the culmination of his creative work. For Irenaeus they exemplify the words of Christ that the Spirit is ready, while the flesh is weak, and so demonstrate what happens to the 'pledge' of the Spirit given in baptism when it fully bears life in the witness of one dying in Christ:

For it is testified by the Lord that as 'the flesh is weak', so 'the Spirit is ready' [Matt.

26:41], that is, is able to accomplish what it wills. If, therefore, anyone mixes the readiness of the Spirit as a stimulus to the weakness of the flesh, it necessarily follows that what is strong will prevail over what is weak, so that the weakness of the flesh will be absorbed by the strength of the Spirit, and such a one will no longer be carnal but spiritual because of the communion of the Spirit. In this way, therefore, the martyrs bear witness and despise death: not after the weakness of the flesh, but by the readiness of the Spirit. For when the weakness of the flesh is absorbed, it manifests the Spirit as powerful; and again, when the Spirit absorbs the weakness, it inherits the flesh for itself, and from both of these is made a living

112 Minns, Irenaeus, 64.

The Glory of God (haer. 3–5)

human being: living, indeed, because of the participation of the Spirit; and human, because of the substance of the flesh. (haer. 5.9.2)113

It is not that they think death to be of no account, or simply embrace it nihilistically, but rather do so as a martyr following Christ. It is, moreover, not only in the resurrection that God's creative work comes to fulfilment, but it is actually in the very death of the martyrs, imaging Christ, who is himself the image of God, that his handiwork is perfected as a truly living human being bearing witness to the paradoxical words of Christ that his strength is made perfect in weakness (2 Cor. 12:9). The Spirit inherits the flesh, possesses it in such a manner that the flesh itself adopts the quality of the life-giving Spirit, and so is rendered like the Word of God (cf. haer.

5.9.3). The paradigm of the living human being—flesh vivified by the Spirit—is the martyr.114

With regard to martyrdom, Irenaeus is emphatic that the Cross of Christ, his suffering and death, is the same as that which his disciples must endure and undergo. The Cross is 'the tree of martyrdom', by which Christ draws all to himself and vivifies all (haer. 4.2.7). Apropos of Christ's words 'If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his Cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life, will lose it; and whoever loses his life for my sake shall find it' (Matt. 16:24–5), and 'You will stand before governors and kings for my sake, and they shall scourge some of you, and shall slay you and persecute you from city to city' (cf.

Matt. 10:18; Mark 13:9; Luke 21:16), Irenaeus comments:

He knew, therefore, those who would suffer persecution, and he knew those who would be scourged and slain because of him; and he did not speak of any other

Cross, but of the Passion which he should himself undergo first, and then his disciples afterwards. (haer. 3.18.5) Thus those who would be disciples of Christ must take up his Cross, deny themselves, and lose their lives for his sake, and this, Irenaeus stipulates, refers to nothing other than the Passion of Christ, which he and his disciples following him must suffer (cf. Luke 24:26, it was 'necessary').

As such, his disciples are those 'who are slain on account of the confession 113 Cf. PO 12.5, 738–9 (frag. 6); TU 36.3, 14–19 (frag. 10).

114 As H. J. Jaschke puts it: 'Das Martyrium is die Grundform christlicher Existenz'

('Pneuma und Moral: Der Grund christlicher Sittlichkeit aus der Sicht des Irena¨us von

Lyon', SM 14 (1976), 239–81; at 265); cf. also Ysabel de Andia, 'La Re´surrection de la chair selon les Valentiniens et Ire´ne´e de Lyon', Les Quatre Fleuves, 15–16 (1982), 69; Real Tremblay,

'Le Martyre selon saint Ire´ne´e de Lyon', SM 16 (1978), 167–89.

Irenaeus of Lyons of the Lord, and who endure all things predicted by the Lord, and who in this way strive to follow the footprints of the Lord's Passion, becoming martyrs of the suffering One' (haer. 3.18.5). As he himself was the 'faithful martyr' (Rev. 1:5), the disciples of Christ must likewise be martyrs in their witness to him, losing their lives, their animation by the breath of life, in order to enter into the life that Christ has brought into this world.

There are two particular figures that feature in Irenaeus, writings who exemplify all that we have seen. The first is Ignatius of Antioch, whom

Irenaeus regards as 'one of our own' and from whose letters Irenaeus cites a striking image:

And therefore throughout all time, the human being, formed at the beginning by the Hands of God, that is, by the Son and the Spirit, becomes after the image and likeness of God: the chaff, that is, the apostasy, being cast away, while the wheat, that is, those who bear as fruit faith in God, being gathered into the granary. And therefore tribulation is necessary for those who are being saved, that, in a certain way, having been threshed and kneaded together, through endurance, with the Word of God, and baked in the fire, they may be suitable for the banquet of the King, as one of ours said, when condemned to the wild beasts because of his testimony [Ææıæ Æ] to God: 'I am the wheat of Christ, and I am ground by the teeth of the wild beasts, that I may be found [to be] pure bread of God.'115

The parallel Irenaeus draws between the Eucharist and human death (haer.

5.2.3), considered earlier, is here applied by Ignatius directly to himself, and interpreted by Irenaeus within the scheme of the whole economy: threshed by tribulation, the chaff or apostasy being cast away, the human being is kneaded together with Christ, and through fire made into bread for the Father's banquet. This is, moreover, the culmination of the fashioning of the creature throughout all time by the Hands of God into the image and likeness of God.

Elsewhere in his Letter to the Romans, Ignatius intimates many of the other themes that we have seen Irenaeus develop. Asking the Christians in Rome not to interfere with his coming martyrdom, he comments: 'If you keep silent about me, I will be a word of God; but if you desire my flesh,

I will once again be a mere noise.'116 Even more strikingly:

115 haer. 5.28.4, referring to Ignatius of Antioch, Rom. 4.1. The eucharistic framework for understanding martyrdom is also evident in The Martyrdom of Polycarp, where the structure of the narrative closely parallels that of the Last Supper.

116 Rom. 2; this is paralleled by Ignatius' description of Jesus Christ as 'the Word proceeding from silence' (Magn. 8), the silence, that is, of the Father, for he is also 'the mouth that does not lie, by whom the Father spoke the truth' (Rom. 8): the Father neither speaks nor says anything apart from Christ, the Word of God. The background for this connection between

The Glory of God (haer. 3–5)

It is better for me to die in Christ Jesus than to rule the ends of the earth. This is the one I seek, who died on our behalf; this is the one I desire, who arose for us. The pains of birth are upon me. Grant this to me, brothers; do not keep me from living; do not wish me to die; do not hand over to the world the one who wants to belong to God or deceive him by what is material. Allow me to receive the pure light; arriving there, I shall be a human being [¼Łæø ÆØ]. Allow me to be an imitator of the suffering of my God.117

Only through his martyrdom, his birth, does Ignatius consider that he will become a human being, in the stature of Jesus Christ, the 'perfect man'.118

At the end of his letter to the Ephesians, Ignatius mentions that, if Christ will, he will send a second small book that he is about to write, discussing

'the economy that leads to the new human being, Jesus Christ, involving his faithfulness and love, his suffering and resurrection'.119 With this set before us, he can urge his readers that, 'if we do not choose to die voluntarily in his sufferings, his life is not in us', for 'our life arose through him and his death'.120 And finally, by sharing in the sufferings of Christ in this way, by being born in him into life, we become members of his body. This is the very birth of Christ himself: 'Through the Cross, by his Passion, he calls you who are parts of his body. Thus the head cannot be born without the other parts, because God promises unity, which he himself is.'121

The other example held up by Irenaeus, accepting that The Letter of the Churches of Vienne and Lyons is his, is the slave girl Blandina. As we saw in the first chapter, the letter describes in graphic detail the sufferings of Christians in Gaul during the persecutions there around the year 177 CE.

During the first round in the arena, some of the Christians 'appeared to be unprepared and untrained, as yet weak and unable to endure such a great conflict'. About ten of these, the letter says, proved to be 'stillborn' or 'miscarried', causing great sorrow to the others and weakening the resolve of those yet to undergo their torture (h.e. 5.1.11). However, these stillborn

Christians were encouraged through the zeal of the others, foremost among whom was Blandina, very much the heroine of the whole account: she is named, while her mistress is not, and as a young slave girl she is the epitome of weakness in the ancient world, and therefore also the vessel in which the power of God can be fully manifest. The Letter describes how

Ignatius 'becoming a word of God' by suffering martyrdom Christ as the Word from silence seems to be the silence of the Father when Christ calls out from the Cross.

117 Ignatius, Rom. 6.

118 Ignatius, Smyrn. 4.

119 Ignatius, Eph. 20.

120 Ignatius, Magn. 5, 9.

121 Ignatius, Trall. 11.

Irenaeus of Lyons Blandina, hung on a stake [Kdºı], was offered as food for the wild beasts that were let in. She, by being seen hanging in the form of a cross, by her vigorous prayer, caused great zeal in the contestants, as, in their struggle, they beheld with their outward eyes, through the sister, him who was crucified for them, that he might persuade those who believe in him that everyone who suffers for the glory of Christ has for ever communion with the living God . . . the small and weak and despised woman had put on the great and invincible athlete, Christ, routing the adversary in many bouts, and, through the struggle, being crowned with the crown of incorruptibility. (h.e. 5.1.41–2)

In her suffering, Blandina became an image, a living icon, of Christ, for those, specifically, who suffer alongside her. In her weakness, the strength of God is victorious, and through her martyrdom incorruptibility is bestowed upon her. This account so clearly draws upon what we have seen in Irenaeus that we must suspect that he is its author: the strength of God is manifest in the weakness of human beings, bestowing incorruptibility on those who follow him, through martyrdom, and so who become, in this way, living images of Christ, in the image and likeness of God.

After describing her suffering, and that of another Christian called Attalus, the letter continues:

Through their continued life the dead were made alive, and the witnesses [the martyrs] showed favour to those who had failed to witness. And there was great joy for the Virgin Mother in receiving back alive those whom she had miscarried as dead. For through them the majority of those who had denied were again brought to birth and again conceived and again brought to life and learned to confess; and now living and strengthened, they went to the judgement seat. (h.e. 5.1.45–06)

As with Ignatius, life and death are completely reversed: those who had turned away from making their confession (that is, who stayed 'alive' in this world) are simply dead. Their lack of preparation has resulted in their condition of being stillborn children of the Virgin Mother. The Virgin

Mother here is simply the Church, as we have also seen above, in considering Irenaeus' expounding of the typological parallelism between Eve and Mary. However, strengthened by the witness of others, especially

Blandina, they were able to go to their martyrdom, so that the Virgin Mother, with great joy, can receive them back as alive, finally giving birth to living children of God. It is for this reason, the letter says later on, that the death of the martyrs is their 'second generation'.122

122 h.e. 5.1.63: ƺتª Æ. See Ch. 3, n. 86, for Irenaeus' use of this term to describe the death and resurrection of the human being.

The Glory of God (haer. 3–5)

Such figures are, for Irenaeus, the very glory of God, truly living and truly human. The whole arc of the economy, the long pedagogy that leads from our first breath in Adam to the power of the life-creating Spirit given by Christ, vivifying the very same flesh as was animated by the breath, begins and ends with Christ. The glory that he had with the Father 'before the world was', is the glory with which he asks to be glorified as he approaches the Cross ( John 17:5), asking that his disciples should be there with him to behold that glory (John 17:24). Following the words in Isaiah, which speak of the gathering of the posterity of everyone, that is, 'who is called by my name, whom I created for glory, whom I formed and made'

(Isa. 43:6–7), the disciples of Christ are gathered around his body, as the eagles gathered around the carcass (Matt. 24:28), 'participating in the glory of the Lord who has both formed us and prepared us for this, that when we are with him, we may partake of his glory' (haer. 4.14.1).

This page intentionally left blank

Conclusion It would be hard to overstate the importance of Irenaeus of Lyons, both with respect to what came before him and for the history of Christian theological reflection and identity thereafter. With Irenaeus we have, for the first time, a fully articulate account of 'orthodoxy' and 'heresy', which recognizes the self-chosen separation of those who did not want to share in the broader fellowship of the Christian communities in Rome, or looked down on others as inferior, and which was prepared to see in the diversity of those who remained together the unity of faith. With Irenaeus we have, for the first time, an account of the 'canon' or 'rule' of truth, not as a list of abstract doctrines supposedly given as an apostolic deposit, but as the coherence of the Scriptures (that is, the 'Old Testament') seen as a mosaic of Christ as preached by the apostles. This, for the first time, enables

Irenaeus to use explicitly almost the full range of writings by the apostles and evangelists thereafter recognized as 'canonical', seeing in them a 'recapitulation' of the Scriptures, making the Word visible and accessible.

In doing this, Irenaeus speaks, for the first time, of the 'economy' of God in the singular sense of an all-embracing coherence of everything spoken by Scripture, from Adam to Christ, with both understood in terms of each other and within a dynamic movement from the first to the second. And, set within the comprehensive scope of the economy, we have with Irenaeus, again for the first time, a full account of the human being, the clay moulded by God throughout the whole economy from Adam to Christ, to bring about the stated intention of God in Genesis, spoken of as his own particular work, to make a human being in his image and likeness, the 'glory of God [that] is a living human being' (haer. 4.20.7).

In and through all of this, Irenaeus establishes a foundation and identifies Christianity in a manner that becomes a given for most Christian history thereafter. In fact, what he establishes is so much taken for granted that it is perhaps not surprising that, paradoxically, his works were not read extensively thereafter, apart from the heresiologists, that is, who mined his work for details about the early heretics. It is thus again perhaps

Irenaeus of Lyons not surprising that it is not only his opponents' works that were lost for many centuries but also his own, at least in the original Greek, Against the Heresies surviving only in a Latin translation, with the last books of that work and the Demonstration newly discovered in an Armenian translation at the beginning of the twentieth century. If recent discoveries of his opponents' works have allowed us to catch a glimpse of 'lost Christianities', to use the title of Bart Ehrman's book, our investigation of Irenaeus' own works has also enabled us to see afresh something that was equally 'lost', for, after having been adapted to centuries of new contexts—imperial

Christianity, Scholasticism, Reformation, Enlightenment, and so on—the foundations and identity of Christianity as elaborated by Irenaeus, despite all its apparent familiarity, when investigated closely can appear strangely unfamiliar territory.

For these reasons, as noted in the Preface and Introduction, the context for the study of Irenaeus undertaken here has not only been the second century, but also our own times, allowing the presuppositions of modern scholarship regarding such matters as orthodoxy and heresy, identity and diversity, Scripture and its exegesis, creation and salvation, as these have come to be shaped at least since the Reformation, to be called into question and challenged by Irenaeus. I would draw particular attention to three key features of what we have seen in this study: the elaboration of 'orthodoxy' and correspondingly of 'heresy'; the comprehensiveness of his understanding of the single economy of God; and his attention to the flesh as the focus of the economy of God. Undergirding these three themes, finally, there is perhaps the most important aspect of his work, which is his understanding of the nature and task of theology.

Irenaeus is, of course, the most important theologian in the articulation of Christian orthodoxy to his time, and, arguably, thereafter. From what we have seen, the standard accepted picture assumed by much contemporary scholarship, that Irenaeus is a leading figure in the emergence of an intolerant, patriarchal, hierarchy, excluding the 'heretics' on the basis of an increasing rigidity regarding what he claimed to be an apostolic deposit, where this is understood as items of theological doctrine in creedal form, simply does not stand up, and in fact is the reverse of what happened.

Marcion broke from the common fellowship of the Christian communities when his efforts at 'reforming' those communities along the lines of what he considered to be the original Gospel failed. The 'Valentinians' likewise were already aware of the distance that separated themselves, as truly 'spiritual', from the lower 'psychic' Christians of the other communities before Irenaeus intervened. Irenaeus is moreover very careful with

Conclusion

his use of the term 'heretic', initially reserving it for those who had already separated themselves from the common fellowship, and gradually extending it to those who had already distanced themselves. And, as we have also seen, it is as the upholder of diversity among and between the communities that he eventually intervenes in affairs in Rome, restoring peace to the strife that such diversity could cause, recalling certain communities to the tradition of toleration exemplified by their predecessors.

Christianity in his day was catholic not by being a universally monolithic institution, but rather by embracing diverse communities in a common fellowship, as the one Body.

Now, clearly, this was not a fellowship that tolerated anything and everything. But, at least in Irenaeus' era, it was not by exercising already demarcated parameters that 'heretics' were excluded. Rather, it was their self-chosen departure that provided occasions for identifying the points at issue and thereby establishing parameters and a framework for understanding what such parameters might be and how they might function. As we have seen, Irenaeus did not understand this in terms of the preservation of a static deposit of teaching, but rather in terms of the functioning of a community of interpretation: seeing in the Scriptures (the 'Old

Testament') a mosaic of the Christ preached by the apostle 'in accordance with the Scriptures', effecting the salvation of the flesh. This interpretative endeavour had been 'delivered' or 'traditioned' by the apostle (cf. 1 Cor.

15:3–5), but it was only in the context of Marcion's proposed retrieval of what he considered to be the original Gospel that it became necessary to specify that it is only ever in relation to Scripture that the Gospel is proclaimed; and only in the context of the various soteriologies proposed by Valentinus and others was it necessary to emphasize that God's handiwork is nothing other than the flesh itself. The 'others' thus not only provided an occasion for greater reflection, but also influenced the direction that this reflection would take. Yet the 'hypothesis' of that reflection, and the 'canon' or 'criterion' that it provides, is not thereby changed to something else: it remains that 'delivered' in the beginning, to be explored in a multitude of ways as the symphony of theology, as discussed in the Introduction, is played out throughout time, with different voices lending different notes and tones, harmonizing the human race to the symphony of salvation.

This symphony of salvation, the divine economy, is at the heart of Irenaeus' work: the way and ways in which the Hands of God fashion the clay taken from the earth throughout time into the image and likeness of God, 'for never at any time did Adam escape the Hands of God, to whom

Irenaeus of Lyons the Father said: "Let us make a human being in our image and likeness"'(haer. 5.1.3). Irenaeus' manner of holding this divine economy together as a single economy is strikingly, and significantly, different from the way in which we have become accustomed to think of creation–fall–redemption almost as 'plan A' followed, after humans disrupt a 'good' creation by introducing sin and death, by 'plan B'. Christ, for Irenaeus, is emphatically not 'plan B'! Such an approach would begin by imagining a good and perfect creation sufficient unto itself, and then see

Christ's work as excising a cancerous growth, as it were, the deformity of sin and death introduced by Adam and Eve. Approached in this way, there would remain something, our own sin and death, that is ultimately outside of God's contro, and that would also be, in the final analysis, meaningless. Irenaeus, instead, holds the wisdom and omnipotence of God as revealed in Christ and deployed throughout the whole economy, from beginning to end as seen from the end, to be such that it embraces and transforms, turns inside out, as it were, human apostasy, to make it subservient to God's project: death was certainly introduced into the world through sin, but the starting point or first principle for that very recognition is Christ's own work of conquering death by his own death, such that we can, in his light, now see that, although death is indeed

'the last enemy', it is also, nevertheless, the means by which it is conquered. Thus, by beginning with what Christ has shown us to be the life and existence of God, that of laying down one's life for others in freedom and love, we can see that the whole economy, embracing our apostasy, has been oriented in such a manner that it provides a pedagogy for the creature made from clay to enter into the life of God and finally in this way become human. God's power, known from the end, in the end turns all things to himself. As Joseph embraced his brothers consoling them that, although they thought that they had sold him into slavery (which, in fact, they had sinfully done), nevertheless it was in truth God who sent him into Egypt to preserve life (Gen. 45:5, 8), so also, in the light of Christ, it turns out that even our apostasy and its result in death lie in God's Hands.

As Irenaeus quotes Jeremiah, 'Your own apostasy shall teach you' (Jer.

2:19; haer. 4.37.7), and death turns out to be the means of life, for 'what you sow does not come to life unless it dies' (1 Cor. 15:36). That this is known only from the end, moreover, means that we can never put ourselves in the position of God 'before' creation (and how indeed could we speak from such a perspective?) to ask whether it could have been otherwise. The language of foreknowledge is deployed only retrospectively from the perspective of having been called; to deploy it ourselves

Conclusion

prospectively inevitably introduces irresolvable problems regarding free will and reduces God to an arbitrary despot.

Yet, for all his importance as an architect of 'orthodoxy' and an expositor or exegete of the divine economy, Irenaeus is par excellence the theologian of the flesh. His theological vision is 'incarnational' through and through, focused on the becoming flesh of God and his handiwork.

While much modern theology wants to emphasize the 'incarnational' dimension of Christianity, to underscore the fact that the body and material reality are good, its focus on human beings as 'persons' betrays something of an uneasiness about the body, as something the 'person' has rather than is. For Irenaeus, on the other hand, the human being is essentially and profoundly skilfully fashioned mud: the flesh is the handiwork of God, fashioned in a hands-on manner by Christ and the Spirit, the Hands of God, leading it from animation by a breath of life to vivification by the Spirit directly, transfiguring the flesh 'inside and out' (haer. 4.39.2), to be a living human being, 'the glory of God' (haer. 4.20.7).

What is meant by 'incarnational' here is very different from how that term has come to be used in modern times. For us, the term 'Incarnation' refers to a movement from God to us, with the second person of the Trinity taking a body by being born of the Virgin. But it is a stubborn fact that the affirmation that 'the Word became flesh' (John 1:14) can be made only once we no longer know the Word according to the flesh (cf. 2 Cor.

5:16). The assumption of the flesh by the Word is less a reduction of the Word to the level of the flesh than it is the raising of the flesh to the level of the Word. It is as the one whose Passion is spoken of by 'Moses and all the prophets' that we come to know Jesus Christ as the Word of God, encountering him in the breaking of the bread, only for him to disappear from our sight (Luke 24:25–35). The revelation of God in a body thus transforms that body so that it is no longer an object of physical sight, and consequently the revelation of God, his revelation, his truth, and his light, is not subsumed or caught within the horizon of this world.1 As such, theological reflection can only ever be interpretative or exegetical, and its point of reference is the transformation effected by Christ in and through his Passion. In turn, the 'glory of God [that] is the living human being' is

1 For reflections on such matters, as they are treated by contemporary phenomenology, see Michel Henry, I am the Truth: Towards a Philosophy of Christianity, trans. Susan Emanuel

(Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003), and Jean-Luc Marion, God without Being, trans. Thomas A. Carlson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), In Excess: Studies of Saturated Phenomena (New York: Fordham University Press, 2002), and The Visible and the Revealed, trans. Christina M. Gschwandtner (New York: Fordham University Press, 2008).

Irenaeus of Lyons not, as we might be tempted to think, what we already are, but rather it is the martyr, the one who takes up the Cross to follow Christ, being born into life as the body of Christ in the womb of the Virgin Mother.

Each of these three points was important in his own time, and just as much in ours, addressing as they do the question of Christian identity and its truth claims in a pluralistic culture, the meaning of suffering and death, and what it is to be human. Yet it is not simply these particular points themselves, but the manner in which Irenaeus addresses them, that is perhaps most important. For a variety of reasons, over recent centuries the discipline of theology has fragmented into a variety of more or less independent disciplines, some historically oriented (such as the study of Scripture and the Fathers), others more constructive (such as systematic or foundational theology), each increasingly unable to comprehend and engage each other.2 As such, it has become increasingly unclear just what is the nature and mode of the particular and peculiar discourse that is theology as theology. It does indeed have its own coherence. But, as Rowan

Williams noted: 'Theology . . . is perennially tempted to be seduced by the prospect of bypassing the question of how it learns its own language.'3

With Irenaeus, however, standing as he does at the beginning of a selfconscious articulation of the discourse of theology, we have the opportunity to learn again its coherence.

2 Cf. Edward Farley, Theologia: The Fragmentation and Unity of Theological Education

(Philadelphia: Augsburg Fortress, 1983); John Behr, The Nicene Faith, The Formation of Christian Theology, vol. 2 (Crestwood, NY: SVS Press, 2004), pt 1, pp. 1–17; Mystery of Christ,

15–20, 173–81.

3 Rowan Williams, On Christian Theology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), 131.

Bibliography

PRIMARY WORKS

Texts Against the Heresies Erasmus, D., Opus eruditissimum divi Irenaei episcopi Lugdunensis in quinque libros digestum . . . (Basle, 1526).

Harvey, W. W., Sancti Irenaei episcopi Lugdunensis libros quinque adversus haereses, 2 vols (Cambridge, 1857).

Massuet, E., Sancti Irenaei episcopi Lugdunensis et martyris detectionis et eversionis falso cognominatae agnitionis libri quinque (Paris, 1710); repr. PG 7 (Paris, 1857).

Rousseau, A., and Doutreleau, L., Ire´ne´e de Lyon: Contre les He´re´sies, Livre I, SC 263–

4 (Paris: Cerf, 1979).

Rousseau, A., and Doutreleau, L., Ire´ne´e de Lyon: Contre les He´re´sies, Livre II, SC 293–

4 (Paris: Cerf, 1982).

Rousseau, A., and Doutreleau, L., Ire´ne´e de Lyon: Contre les He´re´sies, Livre III, SC

210–11 (Paris: Cerf, 1974).

Rousseau, A., Hemmerdinger, B., Doutreleau, L., and Mercier, C., Ire´ne´e de Lyon:

Contre les He´re´sies, Livre IV, SC 100, 2 vols (Paris: Cerf, 1965).

Rousseau, A., Doutreleau, L., and Mercier, C., Contre les He´re´sies, Livre V, SC 152–3

(Paris: Cerf, 1969).

Ter-Mekerttschian, K., and Ter-Minassiantz, E., Irena¨us, Gegen die Ha¨retiker.

[ 0Eº ªå ŒÆd IÆæc B ł ıøı ª ø], Buch IV u. V in armenischer Version, TU 35.2 (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1910).

Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching Ter-Mekerttschian, K., and Ter-Minassiantz, E. (eds and trans.), Des heiligen Irena¨us

Schrift zum Erweise der apostolischen Verku¨ndigung. . . in armenischer Version entdeckt und in Deutsche u¨bersetzt . . . mit einem nachwort und Anmerkungen von

A. Harnack, TU 31.1 (Leipzig: Hinrich, 1907).

Ter-Mekerttschian, K., and Wilson, S. G., with Prince Maxe of Saxony (eds) and Eng. trans., French trans. J. Barthoulot, ¯N K ØØ F I ºØŒF

ŒÅæªÆ; The Proof of the Apostolic Preaching, with Seven Fragments, PO 12.5

(Paris, 1917; repr. Turnhout: Brepols, 1989).

Fragments Holl, K., Fragmente vornica¨nischer Kirchenva¨ter aus den Sacra Parallela, TU 20.2

(Leipzig: Hinrich, 1899).

Bibliography Jordan, H., Armenische Irenaeusfragmente, TU 36.3 (Leipzig: Hinrich, 1913).

Renoux, C., Nouveaux fragments armeniens de l' 'Adversus Haereses' et de l' 'Epideixis',

PO 39.1 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1978).

Translations Against the Heresies Grant, R. M., Irenaeus of Lyons (New York: Routledge, 1997) [Extracts].

Keble, J., Five Books of S. Irenaeus, Against Heresies (London: James Parker, 1872).

Roberts, A., and Donaldson, J. (eds), ANF 1 (Edinburgh, 1887; repr. Grand Rapids:

Eerdmans, 1987).

Unger, D. J., rev. J. J. Dillon, St Irenaeus of Lyons Against the Heresies, Book 1, ACW

55 (New York: Paulist Press, 1992).

Unger, D. J., rev. J. J. Dillon, St Irenaeus of Lyons Against the Heresies, Book 2, ACW

65 (New York: Paulist Press, 2012).

Unger, D. J., rev. M. C. Steenberg, St Irenaeus of Lyons: Against the Heresies, Book 3,

ACW 64 (New York: Newman Press, 2012).

Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching Armitage Robinson, J., St. Irenaeus: The Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching

(London: SPCK, 1920), repr. in I. M. Mackenzie, Irenaeus' Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching: A Theological Commentary and Translation (Farnham: Ashgate,

2002).

Behr, J. (trans.), St Irenaeus of Lyons: On the Apostolic Preaching (Crestwood, NY:

SVS, 1997).

Froidevaux. L. M., Ire´ne´e de Lyon: De´monstration de la Pre´dication Apostolique, SC 62

(Paris: Cerf, 1959).

Rousseau, A. (ed. and trans.), De´monstration de la pre´dication apostolique, SC 406

(Paris: Cerf, 1995).

Smith, J. P., St Irenaeus: Proof of the Apostolic Preaching, ACW 16 (New York:

Newman 1952).

Weber, S., Des Heiligen Irena¨us Schrift zum Erweis der apostolischen Verku¨ndigen, BKV

(Kempton and Mu¨nchen: Ko¨sel, 1912), 1–68 (583–650).

Reference works Reynders, B. (ed.), Lexique compare´ du texte grec et des versions latine, arme´nienne et syriaque de l' 'Adversus Haereses' de saint Ire´ne´e, CSCO 141–2, subsidia 5–6

(Louvain: Peeters, 1954).

Reynders, B. Vocabulaire de la 'De´monstration' et des fragments de S. Ire´ne´e (Louvain:

E´ditions de Chevetogne, 1958).

Sanday W., and Turner, C. H. (eds), Novum Testamentum Sancti Irenaei (Oxford:

Clarendon, 1923).

Bibliography

Other Texts Agapius (Mahboud) of Mendibj, Kitab al-'Unvan, PO 7.4.

Aristotle, On the Soul, ed. and trans. W. S. Hett, LCL Aristotle, 8 (Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press, 1936).

Aristotle, Eudemian Ethics, ed. and trans. H. Rackham, LCL Aristotle, 20 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935).

Aristotle, Metaphysics, ed. and trans. H. Tredennick, LCL Aristotle, 17–18 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933).

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, ed. and trans. H. Rackham, LCL Aristotle, 19 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).

Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, ed. and trans. H. Tredennick, LCL Aristotle, 15 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976).

Aristotle, Rhetoric, ed. and trans. J. H. Freese, LCL Aristotle, 22 (Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press, 1926).

Barnabas, The Epistle of Barnabas, ed. and trans. K. Lake, LCL Apostolic Fathers, 1

(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).

Cabasilas, Nicholas, A Commentary on the Divine Liturgy, trans. J. M. Hussey and P. A. McNulty (London: SPCK, 1960).

Cabasilas, Nicholas, The Life in Christ, ed. and French trans. M.-H. Congourdeau,

SC 361 (Paris: Cerf, 1990); Eng. trans. C. J. deCatanzaro (Crestwood, NY:

St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1974).

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata I–VI, ed. O. Sta¨hlin, 3rd edn., rev. L. Fru¨chtel,

GCS 52 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1972); trans. in ANF 2 (1887: repr. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989), 299–520.

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata VII, VIII, Excerpta ex Theodoto, Eclogae Propheticae,

Quis Dives Salvetur, Fragmente, ed. O. Sta¨hlin, 2nd edn. rev. L. Fru¨chtel and U. Treu, GCS 17 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1970); trans. in ANF 2 (1887: repr.

Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989), 523–567 (Strom. 7–8); 591–604 (Who is the Rich Man that shall be Saved?).

Clement of Rome, First Letter, ed. J. B. Lightfoot, in The Apostolic Fathers (Macmillan, 1889; repr. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1989), pt 1, vols 1–2; ed. and trans.

B. Ehrman, LCL Apostolic Fathers, 1 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).

The Epistle to Diognetus, ed. and trans. K. Lake, LCL Apostolic Fathers, 1 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).

Epiphanius, Panarion, ed. K. Holl: Epiphanius I (heresies 1–33), GCS 25 (Leipzig:

Hinrichs Verlag, 1915); Epiphanius II (heresies 34–64), rev. J. Dummer, GCS 31 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1980); Epiphanius III (heresies 65–80), rev.

J. Dummer, GCS 37 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1985). Selective English trans.

P. R. Amidon, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis: Selected Passages (Oxford:

Oxford University Press, 1990).

Bibliography Eusebius of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History, ed. and trans. K. Lake, LCL (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980).

The Gospel of Truth, ed. and trans. Harold W. Attridge, The Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex), The NHS 22 (Leidon: Brill, 1985); also trans. in Bentley

Layton, The Gnostic Scriptures: Ancient Wisdom for the New Age, Anchor Bible Reference Library (New York: Doubleday, 1987), 253–64.

Gregory of Nazianzus, Orations 27–32. Ed. A. J. Mason, The Five Theological Orations of Gregory of Nazianzus (Cambridge: University Press, 1899). Ed. and French trans. P. Gallay, with M. Jourjon, Gre´goire de Nazianze: Discours 27–31 (Discours

The´ologiques), SC 250 (Paris: Cerf, 1978). Trans. in NPNF 7, and in L. Wickham and F. Williams (trans.), St Gregory of Nazianzus: On God and Christ: The Five

Theological Orations and Two Letters to Cledonius (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 2002).

Gregory of Nyssa, On the Three Day Period, ed. E. Gebhardt, GNO 9 (Leiden: Brill,

1967), 273–306; trans. S. G. Hall, in A. Spira and C. Klock (eds), The Easter Sermons of Gregory of Nyssa, Patristic Monograph Series, 9 (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Patristic Foundation, 1981), 31–50.

Gregory of Nyssa, On Perfection, ed. W. Jaeger, GNO 8.1 (Leiden: Brill, 1986 [1952]), 173–214; trans. in V. Woods Callahan, Saint Gregory of Nyssa: Ascetical

Works, FC 58 (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1967), 95–122.

Hermas, The Shepherd, ed. and trans. K. Lake, LCL Apostolic Fathers, 2 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976).

Hippolytus, Refutation of all Heresies, ed. P. Wendland, GCS 26 (Leipzig: Hinrichs

Verlag, 1916); ed. M. Marcovich, PTS 25 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1986); trans. in ANF 5 (1887; repr. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), 9–153.

Ignatius of Antioch, Letters, ed. and trans. B. Ehrman, LCL Apostolic Fathers, 1

(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).

Isaac of Syria, Isaac of Nineveh (Isaac the Syrian): 'The Second Part', Chapters IV–XLI, ed. S. Brock, CSCO 555, scriptores syri 225 (Louvain: Peeters, 1995).

Justin Martyr, Apologies, ed. M. Marcovich, PTS 38 (Berlin, New York: De Gruyter,

1994); trans. L. W. Barnard, St Justin Martyr: The First and Second Apologies, ACW

56 (New York: Paulist, 1997).

Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, ed. M. Marcovich, PTS 47 (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1997); trans. in ANF 1 (Edinburgh, 1887; repr. Grand Rapids:

Eerdmans, 1987), 194–270.

The Martyrdom of Justin and Companions, ed. and trans. in Herbert Musurillo, The Acts of the Christian Martyrs (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972), 42–61.

Maximus the Confessor, Centuries on Theology and the Economy, trans. in The Philokalia, vol. 2, trans. G. E. H. Palmer, Philip Sherrard, and Kallistos Ware

(London: Faber and Faber, 1981), 114–63.

Origen, Commentary on John, ed. and French trans. C. Blanc, SC 120, 157, 222, 290,

385 (Paris: Cerf, 1966, 1970, 1975, 1982, 1992); English trans. R. E. Heine, Origen:

Bibliography

Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint John, FC 80, 89 (Washington:

Catholic University of America, 1989, 1993).

Origen, Contra Celsum, ed. and French trans. M. Borret, SC 132, 136, 147, 150, 227

(Paris: Cerf, 1967, 1968, 1969 [2], 1976); English trans. H. Chadwick (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1953).

Origen, Homilies on Jeremiah, ed. P. Nautin, French trans. P. Husson and P. Nautin,

SC 232, 238 (Paris: Cerf, 1976, 1977); English trans. J. C. Smith, Origen: Homilies on Jeremiah; Homily on 1 Kings 28, FC 97 (Washington: Catholic University of America, 1998).

Philo, On the Account of the World's Creation given by Moses, ed. and trans.

F. H. Colson and G. H. Whitaker, LCL Philo, 1 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).

Philostratus, Lives of the Sophists, ed. and trans. W. C. Wright, LCL, Philostratus and Eunapius (London: Heinemann, 1922).

Photius, Bibliotheca, ed. and French trans. R. Henry, 8 vols (Paris: Belles Lettres,

1959–77); English trans. (to ch. 145) J. H. Freese (London: SPCK, 1920).

Plato, Laws, ed. and trans. R. G. Bury, LCL Plato, 10–11 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard

University Press, 1961).

Plato, Republic, ed. and trans. P. Shorey, LCL Plato, 5–6 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard

University Press, 1963).

Plato, Timaeus, ed. and trans. R. G. Bury, LCL Plato, 9 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).

The Martyrdom of Polycarp, ed. and trans. B. Ehrman, LCL Apostolic Fathers, 1 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).

Ptolemaeus, Letter to Flora. Text from Epiphanius, Panarion 33.3–7. Ptole´me´e: Lettre a` Flora, ed. and trans. G. Quispel, SC 24 bis (Paris: Cerf, 1966); English trans. in P. R. Amidon, The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis: Selected Passages (Oxford:

Oxford University Press, 1990), 119–23; R. Grant, Second-Century Christianity:

A Collection of Fragments (London: SPCK, 1946), 30–7; and also trans. in Bentley

Layton, The Gnostic Scriptures: Ancient Wisdom for the New Age, Anchor Bible Reference Library (New York: Doubleday, 1987), 308–15.

Quintilian, Institutio Oratoria, ed. and trans. Donald A. Russell, LCL Quintilian: The Orators Education (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).

Sextus Empiricus, Against the Grammarians, ed. and trans. R. G. Bury, LCL Sextus

Empiricus, 4 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937).

Tertullian, Against Marcion, ed. and trans. E. Evans, OECT (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).

Tertullian, On the Resurrection of the Flesh, ed. and trans. E. Evans (London: SPCK,

1960).

Tertullian, On the Soul, ed. J. H. Waszink, (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing

Company, 1947); trans. in ANF 3 (Edinburgh, 1887; repr. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989), 181–235.

Bibliography Tertullian, Prescription against the Heretics, ed. R. F. Refoule´ and French trans. by P. de Labriolle, SC 46 (Paris: Cerf, 1957); trans. in ANF 3 (Edinburgh, 1887; repr.

Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989), 243–65.

Tertullian, Against the Valentinians. Contre les Valentiniens, ed. and French trans.

J. C. Fredouille, SC 280–1 (Paris: Cerf, 1980, 1981); trans. in ANF 3 (Edinburgh,

1887; repr. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989), 503–20.

Ps-Tertullian, Adversus omnes Haereses, ed. E. Kroymann, CCSL 2 (1954), 1399–1410.

Theophilus of Antioch, To Autolycus, ed. and trans. R. M. Grant, OECT (Oxford:

Clarendon, 1970).

SECONDARY WORKS

Aland, B., 'Fides und subiectio: Zur Anthropologie des Irena¨us', in A. M. Ritter

(ed.), Kerygma und Logos: Beitra¨ge zu den geistesgeschichtlichen Beziehungen zwischen

Antike und Christentum. Festschrift fu¨r Carl Andresen zum 70. Geburtstag (Go¨ttingen:

Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1979), 9–28.

Aldama, J. A. de, 'Adam, typus futuri', Sacris Erudiri, 13 (1962), 266–80.

D'Ale`s, A., 'La Doctrine de la re´capitulation en S. Ire´ne´e', RSR 6 (1916), 185–211.

D'Ale`s, A., 'La Doctrine de l'Esprit en saint Ire´ne´e', RSR 14 (1924), 497–538.

Altermath, F., 'The Purpose of the Incarnation according to Irenaeus', StPatr 13,

TU, 116 (Berlin: Akademie, 1975), 63–8.

Altermath, F., Du corps psychique au corps spirituel: Interpre´tation de 1 Cor. 15.35–49 par les auteurs chre´tiens de quatre premiers sie`cles, Beitra¨ge zur Geschichte der biblische Exegese, 18 (Tu¨bingen: Mohr, 1977).

Anderson, G., 'Celibacy or Consummation in the Garden? Reflections on Early Jewish and Christian Interpretations of the Garden of Eden', HTR 82/2 (1989),

121–48.

Andia, Y. de, 'La Re´surrection de la chair selon les Valentiniens et Ire´ne´e de Lyon',

Les Quatre Fleuves, 15–16 (1982), 59–70.

Andia, Y. de, Homo vivens: Incorruptibilite´ et divinisation de l'homme selon Ire´ne´e de

Lyon (Paris: E´tudes Augustiniennes, 1986).

Andia, Y. de, 'Mode`les de l'unite´ des testaments selon Ire´ne´e de Lyon', StPatr 21

(Leuven: Peeters, 1989), 49–59.

Ashbrook Harvey, Susan, and Hunters, David G. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).

Bacq, P., De l'ancienne a` la nouvelle alliance selon S. Ire´ne´e: Unite´ du livre IV de l'Adversus Haereses (Paris: E´ditions Lethielleux, Presses Universitaires de

Namur, 1978).

Bala´s, D. L., 'The Use and Interpretation of Paul in Ireneaus' Five Books Adversus

Haereses', Second Century, 9/1 (1992), 27–39.

Balthasar, H. U. von, Herrlichkeit: Eine theologische Aesthetik, Bd II: Fa¨cher der Stile, I:

Klerikale Stile (Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag, 1962); trans., The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics, ii (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1984).

Bibliography

Barr, James, The Garden of Eden and the Hope of Immortality (Minneapolis: Fortress

Press, 1993).

Bauckham, Richard, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony

(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006).

Bauer, Walter, Rechtglau¨bigkeit und Ketzerei im a¨ltesten Christentum (Tu¨bingen:

Mohr, 1934); trans. of 2nd edn. (1964, ed. G. Strecker) by R. Kraft et al., Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971).

Behr, John, 'Shifting Sands: Foucault, Brown and the Framework of Christian Asceticism', HJ 34.1 (1993), 1–21.

Behr, John, 'Irenaeus AH 3.23.5 and the Ascetic Ideal', SVTQ 37.4 (1993), 305–13.

Behr, John, 'Godly Lives: Asceticism and Anthropology, with Special Reference to Sexuality, in the Writings of St Irenaeus of Lyons and St Clement of Alexandria'

(D.Phil. Oxford University, 1995).

Behr, John, Asceticism and Anthropology in Irenaeus and Clement, OECS (Oxford:

Oxford University Press, 2000).

Behr, John, The Way to Nicaea, Formation of Christian Theology, vol. 1 (Crestwood, NY: SVS Press, 2001).

Behr, John, The Nicene Faith, The Formation of Christian Theology, vol. 2 (Crestwood, NY: SVS Press, 2004).

Behr, John, The Mystery of Christ: Life in Death (Crestwood, NY: SVS Press, 2006).

Behr, John, 'Gaul', in Mitchell and Young (eds), The Cambridge History of Christianity, i, Origins to Constantine, 366–79.

Bengsch, A., Heilsgeschichte und Heilswissen: Eine Untersuchung zur Struktur und

Entfaltung des theologischen Denkens im Werk 'Adversus Haereses' des hl. Irena¨us von Lyon (Leipzig: St Benno, 1957).

Benoıˆt, A., Saint Ire´ne´e: Introduction a` l'e´tude de sa the´ologie, E´tudes d'Histoire et de

Philosophie Religieuses, 52 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1960).

Bentivegna, G., Economia di salvezza e creazione nel pensiero di S. Ireneo (Rome:

Herder, 1973).

Berrouard, M. F., 'Servitude de la Loi et liberte´ de l'Evangile selon saint Ire´ne´e', LV

61 (1963), 41–60.

Berthouzoz, R., Liberte´ et graˆce suivant la the´ologie d'Ire´ne´e de Lyon (Fribourg en

Suisse: E´ditions Universitaires; Paris: Cerf, 1980).

Beyschlag, Karlmann, Simon Magus und die christliche Gnosis, WUNT (Tu¨bingen:

Mohr Siebeck, 1974).

Blanchard, Y. M., Aux sources du canon: Le Te´moignage d'Ire´ne´e (Paris: Cerf, 1993).

Blowers, Paul M., 'The Regula Fidei and the Narrative Character of Early Christian

Faith', Pro Ecclesia, 6 (1997), 199–228.

Boersma, Hans, 'Irenaeus, Derrida and Hospitality: On the Eschatological Overcoming of Violence', MT 19/2 (2003), 163–80.

Bonner, G., 'Martyrdom: Its Place in the Church', Sobornost, 5/2 (1983), 6–21.

Bonwetsch, N., Die Theologie des Irena¨us, Beitra¨ge zur Fo¨rderung christlicher

Theologie, 2/9 (Gu¨tersloh: C. Bertelsmann, 1925).

Bibliography Boulluec, Alain Le, La Notion d'he´re´sie dans la literature greque IIe–IIIe sie`cles (Paris:

E´tudes Augustiniennes, 1985).

Bousset, W., Ju¨disch-christlicher Schulbetrieb in Alexandria und Rom: Literarische

Untersuchungen zu Philo und Clemens von Alexandria, Justin und Irena¨us, Forschung zur Religion und Literatur der Alten und Neuen Testaments, N.F. 6 (Go¨ttingen:

Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1915).

Bousset, W., Kyrios Christos: Geschichte des Christusglaubens von den Anfa¨ngen des

Christentums bis Irenaeus, 2nd edn. (Go¨ttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1921); trans. J. E. Steely, Kyrios Christos: A History of Belief in Christ from the Beginnings of Christianity to Irenaeus (New York, Nashville: Abingdon Press,

1970).

Brakke, David, The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).

Brent, Allen, 'Diogenes Laertius and the Apostolic Succession', JEH 44/3 (1993),

367–89.

Brent, Allen, Hippolytus and the Roman Church in the Third Century: Communities in Tension before the Emergence of a Monarch-Bishop (Leiden: Brill, 1995).

Briggman, Anthony, 'The Holy Spirit as the Unction of Christ in Irenaeus', JTS NS

61/1 (2010), 171–93.

Briggman, Anthony, 'Re-Evaluating Angelomorphism in Irenaeus: The Case of Proof of the Apostolic Preaching 10', JTS NS 61/2 (2010), 583–96.

Briggman, Anthony, 'Revisiting Irenaeus' Philosophical Acumen', VC 65/2 (2011), 115–24.

Briggman, Anthony, 'Spirit-Christology in Irenaeus: A Closer Look', VC 66/1 (2012), 1–19.

Brown, R. F., 'On the Necessary Imperfection of Creation: Irenaeus Adversus Haereses IV.38', SJT 28/1 (1975), 17–25.

Burrus, V., 'Hierarchalization and Genderization of Leadership in the Writings of Irenaeus', StPatr 21 (Leuven: Peeters, 1989), 42–8.

Cabrol, F., and Leclercq, H. (eds), Dictionnaire d'Arche´ologie Chre´tienne et de Liturgie

(Paris: Letouzey et Ane´, 1907–53).

Canlis, Julie, 'Being Made Human: The Significance of Creation for Irenaeus'

Doctrine of Participation', SJT 58/4 (2005), 434–54.

Constantelos, D. J., 'Irenaeus of Lyons and his Central Views on Human Nature',

SVTQ 33/4 (1989), 351–65.

Coolidge, J. S., The Pauline Basis of the Concept of Scriptural Form in Irenaeus, in W.

Wuellner (ed.), Protocol of the Eighth Colloquy: 4 November 1973, The Center for Hermeneutical Studies in Hellenistic and Modern Culture (Berkeley and Los

Angeles: University of California, 1974).

Culpepper, Alan R., John, the Son of Zebedee: The Life of a Legend, Studies on Personalities of the New Testament (Columbia: University of South Carolina

Press, 1994).

Bibliography

Czesz, B., 'La continua presenza dello Spirito Santo nei tempi del Vecchio e del

Nuovo Testamento secondo S. Ireneo (Adv. haer. IV,13,15)', Augustinianum, 20/3 (1980), 581–5.

Daley, B. E., The Hope of the Early Church: A Handbook of Patristic Eschatology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

Danie´lou, J., L'Eˆtre et le temps chez Gre´goire de Nysse (Leiden: Brill, 1970).

Dawson, David, Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992).

Dehandschutter, B., 'The Martyrium Polycarpi: A Century of Research', ANRW 2.27.1 (1993), 485–522.

Dodwell, H., Dissertationes in Irenaeum (Oxford, 1689).

Donovan, M. A., 'Irenaeus in Recent Scholarship', Second Century, 4/4 (1984), 219–

41.

Donovan, M. A., 'Alive to the Glory of God', TS 49/2 (1988), 283–97.

Donovan, M. A., 'Irenaeus: At the Heart of Life, Glory', in A. Callahan (ed.), Spiritualities of the Heart (New York: Paulist, 1989), 11–22.

Doutreleau, L., 'Ire´ne´e de Lyon (saint). I. Vie. II. Œuvres', in Dictionnaire de spiritualite´, ed. M. Viller et al. (1937–), fasc. L–LX, pp. 1923–38.

Dragos, Andrei Giulea, 'Apprehending "Demonstrations" from the First Principle:

Clement of Alexandria's Phenomenology of Faith', JR 89/2 (2009), 187–213.

Droge, A. J., Homer or Moses? Early Christian Interpretation of the History of Culture

(Tu¨bingen: Mohr, 1989).

Dunderberg, Ismo O., Beyond Gnosticism: Myth, Lifestyle, and Society in the School of Valentinus (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008).

Dunning, Benjamin H., Aliens and Sojourners: Self as Other in Early Christianity

(Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvannia Press, 2009).

Dunning, Benjamin H., 'Virgin Earth, Virgin Birth: Creation, Sexual Difference and Recapitulation in Irenaeus of Lyons', JR 89/1 (2009), 57–88.

Dunning, Benjamin H., Specters of Paul: Sexual Difference in Early Christian Thought

(Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).

Edwards, Mark J., 'Gnostics and Valentinians in the Church Fathers', JTS NS 40/1

(1989), 26–47.

Edwards, Mark J., 'Neglected Texts in the Study of Gnosticism', JTS NS 41 (1990),

26–50.

Edwards, Mark J., 'Justin's Logos and the Word of God', JECS 3/3 (1995), 261–80.

Ehrman, Bart D., Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never

Knew (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

E´vieux, P., 'La The´ologie de l'accoutumance chez saint Ire´ne´e', RSR 55 (1967), 5–

54.

Fantino, J., L'Homme, image de Dieu chez saint Ire´ne´e de Lyon (Paris: Cerf, 1984).

Fantino, J., 'La Cre´ation ex nihilo chez saint Ire´ne´e: E´tude historique et the´ologique', RSPT 76/3 (1992), 421–42.

Bibliography Fantino, J., La The´ologie d'Ire´ne´e: Lecture des E´critures en re´ponse a` l'exe´ge`se gnostique:

Une approche trinitaire (Paris: Cerf, 1994).

Fantino, J., 'Le Passage du Premier Adam au Second Adam comme expression du salut chez Ire´ne´e de Lyon', VC 52/4 (1998), 418–29.

Farkasfalvy, D., 'Theology of Scripture in St Irenaeus', RB 78 (1968), 319–33.

Farley, Edward, Theologia: The Fragmentation and Unity of Theological Education (Philadelphia: Augsburg Fortress, 1983).

Farmer, William R., 'Galatians and the Second-Century Development of the Regula Fidei', Second Century, 4/3 (1984), 143–70.

Ferguson, Thomas C., 'The Rule of Truth and Irenaean Rhetoric in Book 1 of Against Heresies', VC 55.4 (2001), 356–75.

Fishbane, Michael, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press,

1985).

Fishwick, D., 'The Federal Cult of the Three Gauls', in Les Martyrs de Lyon (177),

33–45.

Fo¨rster, Niclas, Marcus Magus: Kult, Lehre und Gemeindeleben einer valentinianischen

Gnostikerguppe. Sammlung der Quellen und Kommentar, WUNT 114 (Tu¨bingen:

Mohr-Siebeck, 1999).

Ga¨chter, P., 'Unsere Einheit mit Christus nach dem hl. Irena¨us', ZKT 58 (1939),

503–32.

Gamble, Harry Y., 'Marcion and the "Canon"', in Mitchell and Young (eds), The Cambridge History of Christianity, i, Origins to Constantine, 195–213.

Gonzalez Faus, J. I., Creacio´n y progreso en la teologı´a de San Ireneo (San Cugat del

Valles: Facultad de theologı´a de Barcelona, 1968).

Gonzalez Faus, J. I., Carne de Dios: Significado salvador de la Encarnacio´n en la teologı´a de San Ireneo (Barcelona: Herder, 1969).

Grant, Robert M., 'Irenaeus and Hellenistic Culture', HTR 42 (1949), 41–51; repr. in R. M. Grant, After the New Testament (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1967), 158–69.

Grant, Robert M., 'Eusebius and the Martyrs of Gaul', in Les Martyrs de Lyon (177),

129–36.

Grant, Robert M., Irenaeus of Lyons (New York: Routledge, 1997).

Griffe, E´lie, La Gaule Chre´tienne a` l'E´poque Romaine, i, Des origines chre´tiennes a` la fin du IVe sie`cle (Paris: Picard, 1947).

Hainsworth, John, 'The Force of the Mystery: Anamnesis and Exegesis in Melito's Peri Pascha', SVTQ 46/2 (2002), 107–46.

Harnack, Adolf von, History of Dogma, trans. of 3rd German edn (London, 1896).

Harnack, Adolf von, 'Der Presbyter-Prediger des Irena¨us (IV, 27,1–32,1). 'Bruchstu¨cke und Nachkla¨nger der a¨ltesten exegetisch-polemischen Homilien', in Philotesia: Paul Kleinert zum LXX Geburtstag (Berlin: Trowitzsch, 1907), 1–37.

Harnack, Adolf von, Marcion: Das Evangelium vom fremden Gott: Neue Studien zu Marcion, 2nd edn (1924; repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftlich Buchgesellschaft,

1996); abridged translation, Marcion: The Gospel of the Alien God, trans. John E.

Steely and Lyle D. Bierma (Durham, NC: Labyrinth Press, 1990).

Bibliography

Hays, Richard, Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul (New Haven and London:

Yale University Press, 1989).

Henry, Michel, Incarnation: Une philosophie de la chair (Paris: Seuil, 2000).

Henry, Michel, I am the Truth: Towards a Philosophy of Christianity, trans. Susan

Emanuel (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).

Hemmerdinger, B., 'Les "Notices et extraits" des bibliothe`ques grecques de Bagdad par Photius', REG 69 (1956), 101–3.

Hemmerdinger, B., 'Observations critiques sur Ire´ne´e, IV (Sources chre´tiennes 100), ou les mesaventures d'un philologue', JTS NS 18/2 (1966), 308–22.

Hill, Charles E., 'What Papias said about John (and Luke): A "New" Papian Fragment', JTS NS 49 (1998), 582–629.

Hill, Charles E., Regnum Caelorum: Patterns of Millennial Thought in the Early Church,

2nd edn (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001).

Hill, Charles E., The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

Hill, Charles E., From the Lost Teaching of Polycarp, WUNT 186 (Tu¨bingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006).

Hill, Charles E., 'The "Orthodox Gospel": The Reception of John in the Great Church prior to Irenaeus', in Tuomas Rasimus (ed.), The Legacy of John (Leiden:

Brill, 2009), 233–300.

Hill, Charles E., Who Chose the Gospels? Probing the Great Gospel Conspiracy (Oxford:

Oxford University Press, 2010).

Hitchcock, F. R. M., Irenaeus of Lugdunum: A Study of his Teaching (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1914).

Hitchcock, F. R. M., 'Loofs' Theory of Theophilus of Antioch as a Source of Irenaeus', JTS 38 (1937), 130–9, 255–66.

Hitchcock, F. R. M., 'Loof's Asiatic Source (IQA) and the Pseudo-Justin De resurrectione', ZNTW 36 (1937), 35–60.

Hodge, A. Trevor, Ancient Greek France (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania

Press, 1999).

Hoffman, D. L., The Status of Women and Gnosticism in Irenaeus and Tertullian (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 1995).

Holsinger-Friesen, Thomas, Irenaeus and Genesis: A Study of Competition in Early

Christian Hermeneutics, Journal of Theological Interpretation, Supplement 1 (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbraus, 2009).

Holzhausen, Jens, 'Irena¨us und die valentinianische Schule: zur Praefatio von Adv.

Haer. 1', VC 55/4 (2001), 341–55.

Holte, R., 'Logos Spermatikos: Christianity and Ancient Philosophy According to St Justin's Apologies', ST 12 (1958), 109–68.

Houssiau, A., La Christologie de saint Ire´ne´e (Louvain: Publicationes Universitaires,

1955).

Houssiau, A., 'Le Bapteˆme selon Ire´ne´e de Lyon', ETL 60 (1984), 45–59.

Bibliography Huby, P., and Neal, G. (eds), The Criterion of Truth (Liverpool: Liverpool University

Press, 1989).

L'Huillier, Peter, The Church of the Ancient Councils: The Disciplinary Work of the First

Four Ecumenical Councils (Crestwood, NY: SVS Press, 1996).

Jacobsen, Anders-Christian, 'The Importance of Genesis 1–3 in the Theology of Irenaeus', ZAC 8/2 (2004), 299–316.

Jaschke, H. J., Der Heilige Geist im Bekenntnis der Kirche: Ein Studie zur Pneumatologie des Irena¨us von Lyon im Ausgang vom altchristlichen Glaubensbekenntnis, Mu¨nsterische Beitra¨ge zur Theologie, 40 (Mu¨nster: Aschendorff, 1976).

Jaschke, H. J., 'Pneuma und Moral: Der Grund christlicher Sittlichkeit aus der Sicht des Irena¨us von Lyon', SM 14 (1976), 239–81.

Jeffers, James S., Conflict at Rome: Social Order and Hierarchy in Early Christianity

(Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991).

Jenkins, D. E., 'The Make-up of Man According to St Irenaeus', StPatr 6, TU 81 (Leipzig, 1962), 91–5.

Jonas, H., The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity, 2nd rev. edn (London: Routledge, 1992 [1958]).

Joppich, G., Salus Carnis: Eine Untersuchung in der Theologie des hl. Irena¨us von Lyon,

Mu¨nsterschwarzacher Studien, 1 (Mu¨nsterschwarzach: Vier-Tu¨rme, 1965).

Jouassard, G., 'La The´ologie mariale de saint Ire´ne´e', in L'Immacule´e Conception, 7e

Congre`s Marial National, Lyon 1954 (Lyon, 1954), 265–76.

Jouassard, G., 'Amorces chez saint Ire´ne´e pour la doctrine de la maternite´ spirituelle de la Sainte Vierge', Nouvelle revue mariale, 7 (1955), 217–32.

Jouassard, G., 'Le "Signe de Jonas" dans le Livre IIIe de l'Adversus haereses de saint

Ire´ne´e', in L'Homme devant Dieu: Me´langes offerts au Pe`re Henri de Lubac, v. 1,

Exe´ge`se et patristique (Paris: Aubier, 1963), 235–46.

Kalvesmaki, Joel, 'The Original Sequence of Irenaeus, Against Heresies 1: Another

Suggestion', JECS 15/3 (2007), 407–17.

O'Keefe, John J. 'The New Irenaeus', JTI 5/1 (2011), 113–19.

Kereszty, R., 'The Unity of the Church in the Theology of Irenaeus', Second Century, 4/4 (1984), 202–18.

Klebba, E., Die Anthropologie des hl. Irenaeus, Kirchengeschichtliche Studien, 2.3

(Mu¨nster, 1894).

King, Karen, What is Gnosticism? (Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003).

King, Karen, The Secret Revelation of John (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).

King, Karen, 'Which Early Christianity?', in Ashbrook Harvey and Hunters (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies, 66–84.

Kinzig, W., and Vinzent, M., 'Recent Research on the Origin of the Creed', JTS NS

50/2 (1999), 535–59.

Koch, H., 'Zur Lehre von Urstand und von der Erlo¨sung bei Irena¨us', TSK 96–7 (1925), 183–214.

Bibliography

Koschorke, K., Die Polemik der Gnostiker gegen das kirchliche Christentum, NHS 12

(Leiden: Brill, 1978).

Ko¨stenberger, Andreas J., and Kruger, Michael J., The Heresy of Orthodoxy: How Contemporary Culture's Fascination with Diversity has Reshaped our Understanding of Early Christianity (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2010).

Kugel, James, Traditions of the Bible: A Guide to the Bible as it was at the Start of the Common Era (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).

Kurz, Joel R., 'The Gifts of Creation and the Consummation of Humanity:

Irenaeus of Lyons' Recapitulatory Theology of the Eucharist', Worship, 83/2 (2009), 112–32.

Ku¨rzinger, J., Papias von Hierapolis und die Evangelien des Neuen Testaments (Regensburg: R. Pustet, 1983).

Lampe, Peter, From Paul to Valentinus: Christians at Rome in the First Two Centuries, trans. M. Steinhauser (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003).

Lanne, D. E., 'La Vision de Dieu dans l'œuvre de saint Ire´ne´e', Ire´nikon, 33 (1966),

311–20.

Lassiat, H., Pour une the´ologie de l'homme. Cre´ation . . . Liberte´ . . . Incorruptibilite´:

Insertion du the`me anthropologique de la jeune tradition romaine dans l'oeuvre d'Ire´ne´e

(Lille: Service de reproduction des the`ses, Univ. de Lille, 1972).

Lassiat, H., Promotion de l'homme en Je´sus-Christ d'apre`s Ire´ne´e de Lyon (Tours: Mame,

1974).

Lassiat, H., 'L'Anthropologie d'Ire´ne´e', NRT 100 (1978), 399–417.

Lawson, J., The Biblical Theology of St Irenaeus (London: Epworth Press, 1948).

Layton, Bentley, 'Prolegomena to the Study of Ancient Gnosticism', in L. Michael

White and O. Larry Yarbrough (eds), The Social World of the First Christians:

Essays in Honor of Wayne A. Meeks (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995), 334–50.

Lebeau, P., 'KOINONIA: LaSignification du salut selon S. Ire´ne´e', in J. Fontaine and C. Kannengiesser (eds), EPEKTASIS: Me´langes offerts au Cardinal J. Danie´lou

(Paris: Beauchesne, 1972), 121–7.

Lessing, Gotthold, 'Necessary Answer to a Very Unnecessary Question of Herr Hauptpastor Goeze of Hamburg', in Lessing: Philosophical and Theological

Writings, ed. H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005), 172–7.

Levenson, Jon D., 'The Eighth Principle of Judaism and the Literary Simultaneity of Scripture', JR 68 (1988), 205–25.

Levenson, Jon D., The Hebrew Bible, The Old Testament, and Historical Criticism: Jews and Christians in Biblical Studies (Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox, 1993).

Lieu, Judith M., Christian Identity in the Jewish and Graeco-Roman World (Oxford:

Oxford University Press, 2004).

Lightfoot, J. B., The Apostolic Fathers (Macmillan, 1889; repr. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1989).

Lilla, S. R. C., Clement of Alexandria: A Study in Christian Platonism and Gnosticism

(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971).

Bibliography Lipsius R., 'Irenaeus', DCB iii (London, 1888), 253–79.

Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. (eds), The Hellenistic Philosophers (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1987).

Logan, Alistair H. B., The Gnostics: Identifying an Early Christian Cult (London: T&T

Clark, 2006).

Loofs, F., Theophilus von Antiochien Adversus Marcionem und die anderen theologischen

Quellen bei Irena¨us, TU 46.2 (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1930).

Lu¨ndstrom, S., Studien zur lateinischen Irena¨usu¨bersetzung (Lund: Gleerup, 1943).

Lu¨ndstrom, S., Neue Studien zur lateinischen Irena¨usu¨bersetzung, Lunds Universitets

A˚rsskrift, N.F. Aud. 1, Bd. 44, n. 8 (Lund: Gleerup, 1948).

Lu¨ndstrom, S., U¨bersetzungstechnische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der christlichen

Latinita¨t, Lunds Universitets A˚rsskrift, N.F. Aud. 1, Bd. 55, n. 3 (Lund: Gleerup,

1955).

Lyman, Rebecca, 'Hellenism and Heresy', JECS 11/2 (2003), 209–22.

MacDonald, Nathan, 'Israel and the Old Testament Story in Irenaeus' Presentation of the Rule of Faith', JTI 3/2 (2009), 281–98.

Marion, Jean-Luc, God without Being, trans. Thomas A. Carlson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).

Marion, Jean-Luc, In Excess: Studies of Saturated Phenomena (New York: Fordham University Press, 2002).

Marion, Jean-Luc, The Visible and the Revealed, trans. Christina M. Gschwandtner

(New York: Fordham University Press, 2008).

Marjanen, Antti, 'Gnosticism', in Ashbrook Harvey and Hunters (eds.), The Oxford

Handbook of Early Christian Studies, 203–20.

Markschies, Christoph, Valentinus Gnosticus? Untersuchungen zur valentinianischen

Gnosis mit einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten Valentins, WUNT 65 (Tu¨bingen:

Mohr Siebeck, 1992).

Markus, R. A., 'Pleroma and Fulfillment: The Significance of History in St Irenaeus' Opposition to Gnosticism', VC 8 (1954), 193–224.

Markus, R. A., 'The Problem of Self-Definition: From Sect to Church', in E. P.

Sanders (ed.), Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, i, The Shaping of Christianity in the Second and Third Centuries (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980), 1–15.

Les Martyrs de Lyon (177), Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, no. 575 (Paris: CNRS, 1978).

May, G., Creation Ex Nihilo: The Doctrine of 'Creation out of Nothing' in Early Christian Thought, trans. A. S. Worrall (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994).

May, Gerhard, and Greschat, Katharine (eds), Marcion und seine kirchengeschichtlich

Wirkung: Marcion and his Impact on Church History. Vortra¨ge der Internationalen

Fachkonferenz sur Marcion, gehalten vom 15–18 August 2001 in Mainz (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2002).

May, Jordan Daniel, 'The Four Pillars: The Fourfold Gospel before the Time of Irenaeus', Trinity Journal, 30/1 (2009), 67–79.

Bibliography

Meer, F. van der, and Mohrmann, C., Atlas of the Early Christian World, trans. M. F.

Hedlund and H. H. Rowley (London: Nelson, 1958).

Meijering, E. P., 'Irenaeus' Relation to Philosophy in the Light of his Concept of Free Will', in W. den Boer . . . [et al.] (eds), Romanitas et christianitis: Studia Iano

Henrico Waszink oblata (Amsterdam and London: North Hollons, 1973), 221–32.

Meijering, R., Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia (Groningen: Egbert

Forsten, 1987).

Meyer, John R., 'Assumptio carnis and the Ascent to God: Hilary's Revision of Irenaeus' Doctrine of salus carnis', ZAC 9/2 (2005), 303–19.

Minns, D., Irenaeus (London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1994).

Mitchell, Margaret M., Paul, The Corinthians and the Birth of Christian Hermeneutics

(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Mitchell, Margaret M., and Young, Frances M. (eds) The Cambridge History of Christianity, i, Origins to Constantine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

2006).

Moll, Sebastian, The Arch-Heretic Marcion, WUNT 250 (Tu¨bingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010).

Moringiello, Scott D., 'Irenaeus Rhetor' (Ph.D., University of Notre Dame, 2008).

Mosshammer, Alden A., The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era, OECS (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).

Mutschler, Bernhard, Irena¨us als johanneischer Theologe: Studien zur Schriftauslegung bei Irena¨us von Lyon, Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum, 21 (Tu¨bingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).

Mutschler, Bernhard, Das Corpus Johanneum bei Irena¨us von Lyon: Studien und Kommentar zum dritten Buch von Adversus Haereses, WUNT 189 (Tu¨bingen:

Mohr Siebeck, 2006).

Mutschler, Bernhard, 'John and his Gospel in the Mirror of Irenaeus of Lyons:

Perspectives of Recent Research', in Tuomas Raismus (ed.), The Legacy of John:

Second-Century Reception of the Fourth Gospel, Supplements to Novum Testamentum, 132 (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 319–43.

Nautin, P., Lettres et e´crivains chre´tiens des IIe et IIIe sie`cles (Paris: Cerf, 1961).

Nielsen, J. T., Adam and Christ in the Theology of Irenaeus of Lyons: An Examination of the Function of the Adam–Christ Typology in the Adversus Haereses of Irenaeus, against the Background of the Gnosticism of his Time, Van Gorcum's Theologische Bibliothek, 40 (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1968).

Noormann, R., Irena¨us als Paulusinterpret: Zur Rezeption und Wirkung der paulinischen und deuteropaulinischen Briefe im Werke des Irena¨us von Lyon, WUNT 2.66

(Tu¨bingen: Mohr, 1994).

Norris, R. A., God and the World in Early Christian Theology: A Study on Justin Martyr,

Irenaeus, Tertullian and Origen (London: Adam and Charles Black, 1966).

Norris, R. A., 'Irenaeus' Use of Paul in his Polemic against the Gnostics', in W. S.

Babcock (ed.), Paul and the Legacies of Paul (Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1990), 79–98.

Bibliography Norris, R. A., 'Theology and Language in Irenaeus of Lyon', ATR 76/3 (1994), 285–

95.

Ochagavı´a, J., Visibile Patris Filius: A Study of Irenaeus' Teaching on Revelation and Tradition, OCA 171 (Rome: Pont. Inst. Orientalium Studiorum, 1964).

Olson, M. J., Irenaeus, the Valentinian Gnostics and the Kingdom of God (AH Book V):

The Debate about 1 Corinthians 15.50 (New York: Mellin, 1992).

Orbe, A., Estudios Valentinianos, 1, Hacia la primera theologı´a de la procesio´n del Verbo

(Rome, 1958).

Orbe, A., 'El hombre ideal en la teologı´a de s. Ireneo', Greg. 43 (1962), 449–91.

Orbe, A., 'El pecado de Eva, signo de division', OCP 29 (1963), 305–30.

Orbe, A., 'El pecado original y el matrimonio en la teologı´a del s. II', Greg. 45

(1964), 449–500.

Orbe, A., 'Homo nuper factus: En torno a S. Ireneo, adv. haer. IV.38.1', Greg. 46

(1965), 481–544.

Orbe, A., 'El suen˜o y el paraı´so: Iren., Epid. 13', Greg. 48 (1967), 346–9.

Orbe, A., 'La definicio´n del hombre en la teologı´a del siglo IIe', Greg. 48 (1967),

522–76.

Orbe, A., 'La atonia del espiritu en los Padres y teo´logos del s.II', La Ciudad de Dios,

181 (1968), 484–528.

Orbe, A., Antropologı´a de San Ireneo, BAC (Madrid: BAC, 1969).

Orbe, A., Para´bolas evange´licas en San Ireneo, 2 vols (Madrid: BAC, 1972).

Orbe, A., 'Supergrediens angelos: AH V.36.1', Greg. 54 (1973), 5–69.

Orbe, A., 'Los Valentinianos y el matrimonio espiritual: Hacia los orı´genes de la mı´stica nupcial', Greg. 58/1 (1977), 5–53.

Orbe, A., 'San Ireneo y la creacio´n de la materia', Greg. 59/1 (1978), 71–127.

Orbe, A., 'Adversarios ano´nimos de la salus carnis (Iren. adv. haer. V.2.2s)', Greg. 60/

1 (1979), 9–53.

Orbe, A., 'San Ireneo y la doctrine de la reconciliacio´n', Greg. 61/1 (1980), 5–50.

Orbe, A., 'Cinco exegesis ireneanas de Gn. 2.17b: adv. haer. V, 23,1–2', Greg. 62

(1981), 75–113.

Orbe, A., 'La virgen Marı´a abrogada de la virgen Eva: En torno a s. Ireneo, adv. haer. V.19.1', Greg. 63/3 (1982), 453–506.

Orbe, A., 'Visio´n del Padre e incorruptela segu´n san Ireneo', Greg. 64/2 (1983),

199–241.

Orbe, A., '¿San Ireneo adopcionista? En torno a adv. haer. III.19.1', Greg. 65/1 (1984),

5–52.

Orbe, A., Teologı´a de San Ireneo: Comentario al libro V del 'Adversus Haereses', 3 vols

(Madrid: BAC, 1985, 1987, 1988).

Orbe, A., 'Deus facit, homo fit: Un axioma de san Ireneo', Greg. 69/ (1988), 629–61.

Orbe, A., 'Gloria Dei vivens homo: Ana´lisis de Ireneo, adv. haer. IV.20.1–7', Greg.

73/2 (1992), 205–68.

Orbe, A., 'Los hechos de Lot, mujer e hijas vistos por san Ireneo (adv. haer. IV, 32,1,

15/3, 71)', Greg. 75/1 (1994), 37–64.

Bibliography

Orbe, A., 'Sobre los "Alogos" de san Ireneo (adv. haer. III, 11, 9)', Greg. 76/1 (1995),

47–68.

Orbe, A., 'El Espı´ritu en el bautismo de Jesu´s (en torno a san Ireneo),' Greg. 76/4

(1995), 663–99.

Orbe, A., 'El signo de Jona´s segu´n Ireneo', Greg. 77/4 (1996), 637–57.

Osborn, E. F., 'Reason and the Rule of Faith in the Second Century', in Rowan Williams (ed.), The Making of Orthodoxy: Essays in Honour of Henry Chadwick

(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 40–61.

Osborn, E. F., Irenaeus of Lyons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

Osiek, Carolyn, and Koester, Helmut, Shepherd of Hermas, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1999).

Overbeck, Winfried, Menschwerdung: Eine Untersuchung zur literarischen und theologischen Einheit des fu¨nften Buches 'Adversus Haereses' des Irena¨us von Lyon, Basler und

Berner Studien zur historischen und systematischen Theologie, 61 (Bern: Peter Lang, 1995).

Pagels, Elaine, The Gnostic Gospels (London: Penguin, 1980).

Pagels, Elaine, Adam, Eve and the Serpent (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1988).

Pagels, Elaine, 'Irenaeus, the "Canon of Truth", and the Gospel of John: "Making a Difference" through Hermeneutics and Ritual', VC 56/4 (2002), 339–71.

Pagels, Elaine, Beyond Belief: The Secret Gospel of Thomas (New York: Random House, 2003).

Paice, R. J. R., 'Irenaeus on the Authority of Scripture, the "Rule of Truth" and Episcopacy', in two parts, Churchman, 117/1 (2003), 57–71, and 117/2 (2003),

133–52.

Palashkovsky, V., 'La The´ologie eucharistique de S. Ire´ne´e, e´veˆque de Lyon',

StPatr 2, TU 64 (Berlin: Akademie, 1957), 277–81.

Petersen, W. L., 'Eusebius and the Paschal Controversy', in Harold W. Attridge and Gohei Hata (eds), Eusebius, Christianity and Judaism (Leiden: Brill, 1992).

Pe´trement, S., Le Dieu se´pare´: Les Origines du gnosticisme (Paris: Cerf, 1984); trans. C.

Harrison, A Separate God: The Origins and Teachings of Gnosticism (San Francisco:

Harper, 1990).

Piana, George La, 'The Roman Church at the End of the Second Century', HTR 18 (1925), 201–77.

Piana, George La, 'Foreign Groups in Rome during the First Centuries of the Empire', HTR 20 (1927), 183–403.

Pru¨mm, K., 'Go¨ttliche Planung und menschliche Entwicklung nach Irena¨us Adversus Haereses', Scholastik, 13 (1938), 206–24, 342–66.

Pru¨mm, K., 'Zur Terminologie und zum Wesen der christliche Neuheit bei Irena¨us', in T. Klauser and A. Rucker (eds), Pisciculi: Studien zur Religion und

Kultur des Altertums, Franz Joseph Do¨lger zum sechzigsten Geburtstag dageboten von

Freunden, Verehrern und Schu¨lern (Mu¨nster: Aschendorff, 1939), 192–219.

Purvis, James G. M., 'The Spirit and the Imago Dei: Reviewing the Anthropology of Irenaeus of Lyons', Evangelical Quarterly, 68 (1996), 99–120.

Bibliography Quasten, J., Patrology, i (Utrecht: Spectrum, 1950).

Quentin, H., 'La Liste des martyrs de Lyon de l'an 177', AB 39 (1921), 113–38.

Ramos-Lisso´n, D., 'Le Roˆle de la femme dans la the´ologie de saint Ire´ne´e', StPatr

21 (Leuven: Peeters, 1989), 163–74.

Reed, Annette Yoshiko, 'EUANGELION: Orality, Textuality, and the Christian Truth in Irenaeus' Adversus haereses', VC 56/1 (2002), 11–46.

Reimarus, Herman, 'The Intention of Jesus and his Disciples', in Reimarus: Fragments, ed. Charles H. Talbert, trans. Ralph S. Fraser (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2009).

Reimherr, O., 'Irenaeus Lugdunensis', in V. Brown (ed.), Catalogus translationum et commentariorum: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries,

Annotated Lists and Guide, 7 (Washington: Catholic University of America, 1992),

14–54.

Reumann, J., 'ONŒ Æ as "Ethical Accommodation" in the Fathers, and its Pagan Background', StPatr 3.1, TU 78 (Berlin: Akademie, 1961).

Robinson, J. A., 'Notes on the Armenian Version of Adv. Haereses IV, V', JTS 32 (1930–1), 153–166, 370–93.

Robinson, James M., and Koester, Helmut, Trajectories through Early Christianity

(Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971).

Rousseau, A., 'Le Verbe "imprime´ en forme de croix dans l'univers": A propos de deux passages de saint Ire´ne´e', in Armeniaca: Me´langes d'e´tudes arme´niennes

(Venice: S. Lazarus, 1969), 67–82.

Rousseau, A., 'La Doctrine de saint Ire´ne´e sur la pre´existence du Fils de Dieu dans

De´m. 43', Muse´on, 89 (1971), 5–42.

Rousseau, A., 'L'E´ternite´ des peines de l'enfer et l'immortalite´ naturelle de l'aˆme selon saint Ire´ne´e', NRT 99 (1977), 834–64.

Rousseau, Philip, Pachomius: The Making of a Community in Fourth Century Egypt, The Transformations of the Classical Heritage (Berkeley and Los Angeles:

University of California Press, 1985).

Rudolph, K., Gnosis: The Nature and History of an Ancient Religion, trans. R. McL.

Wilson (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1983).

Sagnard, F. M. M., La Gnose valentinienne et le te´moignage de saint Ire´ne´e (Paris: Vrin,

1947).

Sanders, E. P., Paul and Palestinian Judaism (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977).

Sanders, E. P. (ed.), Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, i, The Shaping of Christianity in the Second and Third Centuries (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980).

Scharl, E., 'Der Rekapitulationsbegriff des heiligen Irena¨us', OCP 6 (1940), 376–416.

Schoedel, W. R., 'Theological Method in Irenaeus (Adversus Haereses 2.25–28)', JTS

NS 35 (1984), 31–49.

Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M., and Barnes, J. (eds), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).

Schu¨ngel, Paul, 'Das Valentinreferat des Irena¨us von Lyon (Haer. I 11,1)', VC 55/4

(2001), 376–405.

Bibliography

Schutz, D. R., 'The Origin of Sin in Irenaeus and Jewish Pseudoepigraphical Literature', VC 32.3 (1978), 161–90.

Simonin, H. D., 'A propos d'un texte eucharistique de S. Ire´ne´e: AH. IV.xviii.5',

RSPT 23 (1934), 281–92.

Simpson, R. L., 'Grace and Free Will: A Study in the Theology of St Irenaeus', in R.

L. Simpson (ed.), One Faith: It's Biblical, Historical, and Ecumenical Dimensions. A Series of Essays in Honour of Stephen J. England (Enid, OK: Phillips University

Press, 1966), 59–72.

'Sites and Museums in Roman Gaul I', Athena Review: Journal of Archaeology, History, and Exploration, 1/4 (1998) <http://www.athenapub.com> (accessed 10 September 2012).

Skarsaune, Oscar, The Proof from Prophecy: A Study in Justin Martyr's Proof-Text

Tradition: Text-Type, Provenance, Theological Profile (Leiden: Brill, 1987).

Smith, Christopher R., 'Chiliasm and Recapitulation in the Theology of Irenaeus',

VC 48/4 (1994), 313–31.

Smith, Daniel, 'Irenaeus and the Baptism of Jesus', TS 58/4 (1997), 618–42.

Smith, J. P., 'Hebrew Christian Midrash in Irenaeus Epid. 43', Biblica, 38 (1957),

24–34.

Smith, M., Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark (Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press, 1973).

Snyder, Harlow Gregory, '"Above the Bath of Myrtinus": Justin Martyr's "School" in the City of Rome', HTR 100/3 (2007), 335–62.

Stanton, Graham N., 'The Fourfold Gospel', NTS 43/3 (1997), 317–46.

Starr, Raymond, 'The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World', CQ 37/1 (1987), 213–23.

Steenberg, M. C., 'Children in Paradise: Adam and Eve as "Infants" in Irenaeus of Lyons', JECS 12/1 (2004), 1–22.

Steenberg, M. C., 'The Role of Mary as Co-Recapitulator in St Irenaeus of Lyons',

VC 58 (2004), 117–37.

Steenberg, M. C., Irenaeus on Creation: The Cosmic Christ and the Saga of Redemption,

Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 91 (Leiden: Brill, 2008).

Steenberg, M. C., 'Irenaeus on Scripture, Graphe, and the Status of Hermas', SVTQ

53/1 (2009), 29–66.

Stevenson, J., A New Eusebius: Documents Illustrative of the History of the Church to A.

D. 337 (London: SPCK, 1963).

Stewart-Sykes, A., The Lamb's High Feast: Melito, Peri Pascha and the Quartodeciman

Paschal Liturgy at Sardis (Leiden: Brill, 1998).

Striker, G., '˚æØæØ B IºÅŁ Æ', Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Go¨ttingen, Phil.-hist. Kl., 2 (1974), 47–110.

Swete, H. B., foreword in F. R. M. Hitchcock, Irenaeus of Lyons: A Study of his Teaching (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1914).

Thomassen, Einar, 'Orthodoxy and Heresy in Second Century Rome', HTR 97/3 (2004), 241–56.

Bibliography Thomassen, Einar, The Spiritual Seed: The Church of the 'Valentinians' (Leiden: Brill,

2008).

Thornton, Claus-Ju¨rgen, Der Zeuge des Zeugen: Lukas als Historiker der Paulusreisen,

WUNT 56 (Tu¨bingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991).

Thornton, L. S., 'St Irenaeus and Contemporary Theology', StPatr 2, TU 64 (Berlin: Akademie, 1957), 317–27.

Tiessen, T. L., Irenaeus on the Salvation of the Unevangelized (Metuchen, NJ, and London: Scarecrow Press, 1993).

Timothy, H., The Early Christian Apologists and Greek Philosophy Exemplified by Irenaeus, Tertullian and Clement of Alexandria (Assen: Van Corcum, 1973).

Torrance, Thomas F., Divine Meaning: Studies in Patristic Hermeneutics (Edinburgh:

T&T Clark, 1995.) Tortorelli, K., 'Some Notes on the Interpretation of St Irenaeus in the Works of Hans Urs von Balthasar', St Patr. 23 (Leuven: Peeters, 1989), 284–8.

Tremblay, R., La Manifestation et la vision de Dieu selon saint Ire´ne´e de Lyon,

Mu¨nsterische Beitra¨ge zur Theologie, 41 (Mu¨nster: Aschendorff, 1978).

Tremblay, R., 'Le Martyre selon saint Ire´ne´e de Lyon', SM 16 (1978), 167–89.

Trevett, Christine, Montanism: Gender, Authority, and the New Prophecy (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Tripp, David H., 'The Original Sequence of Irenaeus' "Adversus Haereses" I: A Suggestion', Second Century, 8 (1991), 157–62.

Unger, D. J., 'The Divine and Eternal Sonship of the Word According to St Irenaeus of Lyons', Laurentianum, 14 (1973), 357–408.

Unnik, W. C. van, 'An Interesting Document of Second Century Theological Discussion (Irenaeus, Adv. Haer. 1.10.3)', VC 31 (1977), 196–228.

Valle´e, G., 'Theological and Non-Theological Motives in Irenaeus' Refutation of the Gnostics', in E. P. Sanders (ed.), Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, i, The Shaping of Christianity in the Second and Third Centuries (Philadelphia: Fortress,

1980). 174–85.

Vinzent, Markus, 'Rome', in Mitchell and Young (eds), The Cambridge History of Christianity, i, Origins to Constantine, 397–412.

Vogel, Jeff, 'The Haste of Sin, the Slowness of Salvation: An Interpretation of Irenaeus on the Fall and Redemption', ATR 89/3 (2007), 443–59.

Waldstein, Michael, 'Hans Jonas' Construct "Gnosticism": Analysis and Critique',

JECS 8/3 (2000), 340–72.

Wanke, Daniel, 'Irena¨us und die Ha¨retiker in Rom: Thesen zur geschichtlichen Situation von Adversus haereses', ZAC 3/2 (1990), 202–40.

Wanke, Daniel, Das Kreuz Christi bei Irena¨us von Lyon, Beihefte zur ZNTW 99 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000).

Weidmann, Frederck W., Polycarp and John: The Harris Fragments and their Challenge to the Literary Traditions (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press,

1999).

Bibliography

Werner, J., Der Paulinismus des Irenaeus: Eine Kirchenund Dogmengeschichtliche

Untersuchung u¨ber das Verha¨ltnis des Irenaeus zu der Paulinischen Briefsammlung und Theologie (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1889).

Widmen, M., 'Irena¨us und seine theologischen Va¨ter', ZKT 54 (1957), 156–73.

Williams, Michael Allen, Rethinking 'Gnosticism': An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).

Williams, Rowan, On Christian Theology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).

Winden, J. C. M. van, An Early Christian Philosopher: Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Trypho, Chapters One to Nine: Introduction, Text and Commentary (Leiden: Brill,

1971).

Wingren, G., Ma¨nniskan och Inkarnationen enligt Irena¨us (Lund: Cleerup, 1947); trans. R. Mackenzie, Man and the Incarnation: A Study in the Biblical Theology of Irenaeus (London: Oliver and Boyd, 1959).

Winling, R., 'Une fac¸on de dire le salut: La Formule "eˆtre avec Dieu eˆtre avec Je´sus

Christ" dans les e´crits de saint Ire´ne´e', RSR 58 (1984), 105–35.

Wood, A. S., 'The Eschatology of Irenaeus', Evangelical Quarterly, 41 (1969), 30–41.

Young, Frances, Biblical Exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1997).

This page intentionally left blank

Index Cerinthus 64, 65, 83, 84 chiliasm 68, 70, 102, 181–4 Church 2–3, 7, 9, 23–4, 27, 29, 38, 40, Abercius Marcellus 71 Adam 92–3, 99, 100–1, 122–3, 131, 143–4, 145–9, 151, 155, 160, 161, 163, 166–72, 185, 190 Agapius (Mahboud) of Mendibj 53 Andia, Ysable de 153, 164–5, 175, 45–6, 70, 79, 93, 101, 167–8, 172–5, 180, 194, 202 Clement of Alexandria 58, 78, 112–14 Clement of Rome 22, 23, 48, 49, 50, 190, 199 Anicetus of Rome 25, 27, 44, 45, 48, 114–15 creation 100–1, 122–3, 163, 180–5 Cross 91, 127–8, 133–5, 143, 199, 201 49–50, 55–6 Aristotle 11, 45, 67, 106, 112–13 see also Passion Culpepper, Alan R. 58

Bacq, Philippe 15, 73, 94, 95, 186, 189, 190, 191, 192, 196 Balthasar, H. Urs von 14, 116, 149, 181 Baptism 33, 35, 71, 79, 90, 111–12, 133,

Dawson, David 108 death 91, 97, 99, 101, 102, 116, 124, 148–9, 150, 158–62, 168–72, 183–4, 193, 194, 198–9, 200, 201, 202, 208 Demonstration of the Apostolic 164,170,172–3,175–8,180,181,198 Barr, James 132, 172 Bauckham, Richard 59, 76 Bauer, Walter 5–6 Behr, John 19, 37, 68, 147, 148–9, 152, Preaching 13, 68–9, 76, 88, 132–3, 138, 164, 171, 189 Dodwell, H. 14

Doutreleau, L. 19, 79–80 Dunderberg, O. 27, 31, 43, 79 156, 174, 210 Berthouzoz, Roger 159, 188, 192, 193–4 Blanchard, Yves-Marie 68 Blandina 19, 201–2 Blastus 14, 53–4 Bousset, W. 15

Brakke, David 6, 7, 8–9, 16, 40, 45, economy 90, 92, 93, 96, 99, 103, 111, 116, 121–3, 124–5, 129, 138–9, 142, 144–62, 165, 181, 184–5, 189, 191–2, 194, 196–7, 200, 201, 203, 207–9 Ebionites 64, 83, 84, 92, 99, 150, 173 Ehrman, Bart D. 1, 3, 6, 61, 206 Eleutherus of Rome 16, 21, 47–50, 68, 84, 108 breath 93, 99, 149–58, 167, 169, 175, 196

Brent, Allen 49 Brown, Robert 195 Cabasilas, Nicholas 146, 180 canon 4, 11, 54, 67, 79, 83, 111–16, 69, 88 Epicurus 11, 113 Eucharist 11, 33, 35, 41, 41, 55–7, 99, 118, 121 Carpocrates 44–5, 64, 83, 84, 87 Cerdo 24–5, 27, 46, 47, 64, 83, 84 114–16, 178–80, 200

Index human being 92–3, 95–6, 97, 99, 100, Eusebius of Caesarea 13, 14, 16, 20, 36,

103, 119–20, 141, 151, 152, 154–5, 156, 157–8, 161, 162–72, 175–7, 178, 179–80, 184–5, 186–7, 188, 192–203 see also flesh, plasma hypothesis 11, 78–9, 105–6, 109, 112–14,

49, 50, 52, 53, 54–7, 61, 68, 69, 76 Eve 93, 155, 160, 167, 168, 169, 172, 174, 202 fabrication see plasma Fantino, Jacques 125, 149, 166–7 flesh 99–100, 110, 116, 119–20, 123, 116, 117, 118, 121, 144–5, 207 152, 153, 157–8, 164–6, 176–7, 178–9, 181, 198–9, 209–10 see also human being, plasma Flora 31–32, 34 Florinus 13–14, 31, 34, 50–3, 58, 60, 63,

Ignatius of Antioch 22, 39, 47, 60, 65, 136, 200–1, 202 image of God 77, 99, 101, 119–20, 121, 122, 143–4, 151, 157, 163, 164, 166–7, 171, 176–7, 181, 184–5, 187, 195, 197, 200 Isaac of Syria 135 64, 68, 69–70 forbearance 51, 52, 99, 159–60, 194 Gnosticism 4, 8–9, 15, 107–8 Gnostics 8–9, 16, 45, 80, 84, 85, 87, 97

Gospel 66, 88, 89, 95, 124–6, 131–2, Jaschke, H. J. 190, 199 Jesus Christ 89–93, 95–7, 100–1, 109–10, 121–3, 126–7, 131–2, 136, 139–44, 145–8, 158, 166–7, 170, 175–6, 184–5, 198 John 50, 51, 54, 56, 58–9, 65, 66, 70, 71,

133–4, 136–40, 142–3, 147 Gospel of Truth 30, 32, 140 Grant, Robert M. 16, 67, 136, 166, 170 Gregory of Nazianzus 119 Gregory of Nyssa 135, 195 79, 88, 90, 106–10, 132, 136, 140, 150, 151, 182–3 Jonah 91, 159–60, 168, 193 Jonas, Hans 107–8 Justin Martyr 28, 29, 34–44, 47, 82, handiwork see plasma harmony 9, 50, 52, 107, 115, 117, 119, 135, 152 129, 165, 189, 190, 191, 207 see also symphony Harnack, Adolf von 4, 5, 14, 25, 26, Kalvesmaki, Joel 78 King, Karen 4–5, 6, 7, 84 Kugel, James 129–30 27, 137 Harvey, W. W. 52, 76 Hays, Richard 131, 134, 135 Hegesippus 28, 49–50, 58 heresy 1–12, 27, 38–41, 46–7, 80, Lampe, Peter 6, 21–2, 25, 26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 42, 43, 45, 48 Lassiat, Henri 152 Le Boulluec, Alain 38, 39 Lessing, Gotthold 3, 4, 10, 11, 113 Letter of the Churches of Vienne and 83–4, 206–7 Hermas 22–4, 27, 29, 30, 40, 46, 93 Hill, Charles 15, 25–6, 44, 51, 52, 58–9,

61–6, 67, 68–70, 132 Holsinger-Friesen, Thomas 122, 123, Lyons 14, 16–17, 18–19, 21, 48, 174, 201–2 137, 151, 171

Index

Passion of Christ 10, 92, 101, 115–16, Letter to Diognetus 52, 59, 159 Lipsius, R. 67 likeness to God 101, 157, 166, 171–2, 124, 133–5, 143, 168, 172, 175–6, 179, 199, 209 see also cross Paul 7, 11, 22, 38–9, 46, 47, 65, 83, 89, 90,

173, 190 see also image of God Loofs, Friedrich 14–15 Lyman, Rebecca 7, 37–8, 39, 42 91, 92, 109–10, 114, 115, 119, 122–3, 125, 128, 130–1, 132, 135, 137, 141, 145, 147, 150, 154, 157, 183, 185 Pectorius 71 Pe´trement, Simone 83 plasma 105–6, 108–9, 110, 119, 142–3, Marcion 2–3, 5, 9, 25–7, 29, 31 36, 39, 40, 41–2, 44, 46, 47, 51, 62, 63, 64, 65, 70, 83, 84, 97, 114, 206–7 Marcellina 45, 75, 83, 84 Marcus 20, 44, 61, 80–1, 82, 84, 104 Markschies, Christoph 29, 82 martyrs 18–20, 91, 97, 143, 198–203 Mary 93, 150, 163, 174 151, 152, 157–8, 164–5, 167, 178, 184–5, 187, 198, 207, 209 Polycarp 28, 44, 47, 50–2, 54, 55–6, 57–67, 70, 71, 81, 84, 97, 110, 115, 159, 177, 200 Polycrates 54, 56–7 Pothinus 19, 23 Ptolemaeus 20, 28, 31–2, 34, 43, 74, 78, see also Virgin Maximus the Confessor 14, 66 Meijering, R. 105, 106, 111, 112, 125 Melito of Sardis 54, 66, 132 Menander 39, 40, 64, 83 Minns, D. 140, 195, 198 Moll, Sebastian 25, 27 More, Henry 8 Moringiello, Scott D. 74

79, 81–3, 84, 87, 104 Quartodeciman controversy 54–7, 115 Quasten, Johannes 15 Quintilian 136–7 recapitulation 90, 92–3, 101, 136–40, 142–3, 163, 169, 170–1, 181–2, 184–5 Rousseau, A. 68, 76, 79, 89, 92, 92, 94,

Nautin, P. 14, 19, 20 Nicolaitans 64, 83 Noorman, Rolf 134, 154 Norris, Richard A. 31, 106, 116 99, 100, 117, 124, 135, 142, 145, 146, 152, 157, 159, 160, 165, 171, 174, 177, 184, 186, 190 Orbe, Antonio 99, 164–5, 180, 184, Sanders, E. P. 147

Scripture 3–4, 10, 53, 37, 65–6, 76, 188, 190 Origen 10, 36, 150, 164, 165, 177 orthodoxy 1–12, 41–2, 46–7, 96–7, 101, 109–10, 113, 123, 124–40, 185, 191, 205 Simon Magus 10, 15, 39, 40, 64, 80, 83 Smith, Christopher 181 Spirit, the 93, 95, 99–100, 111, 149–58,

58, 206–7 see also canon Osborn, Eric 11, 113, 136–7 Overbeck, Winfried 99, 100 164–5, 167, 171–2, 175–7, 189–92, 196, 198–9 Steenberg, M. C. 142, 146, 167, 174 Pagels, Elaine 53 Papias 58–9, 69–70, 76, 102, 183

Index Valentinus 2, 9, 20, 27–34, 40–1, Swete, H. B. 13 symphony 9–11, 114, 125, 165, 42–3, 44, 47, 52, 69, 70, 73, 74, 79–80, 81–3, 84–5, 97, 103–4, 108, 206–7 Victor of Rome 13, 14, 28, 31, 34, 48, 190–2, 207 see also harmony 52–3, 54–7, 63, 68, 69 Virgin, the 91, 92, 163, 170–1, 172–5, Tertullian 25, 26, 28, 29, 36, 48, 114, 166, 168 Theophilus of Antioch 167, 168 Thomassen, Einar 23, 24, 27, 28–30, 177, 202, 209–10 see also Eve, Mary Vogel, Jeff 196 31, 32, 42, 46, 53, 78, 80, 81–3, 108 Torrance, Thomas F. 138 tradition 32, 54, 79, 88, 105, 109, Weidmann, Frederick W. 58

Williams, Rowan 210 Wingren, Gustaf 15, 147, 195 114–15, 125–6, 207 Tripp, David H. 78

↑ Back to top

↑