Word and Sacrament
WORD AND SACRAMENT
HOW A GENUINE CHURCH IS IDENTIFIED
. . . the church in Ephesus . . . the church in Smyrna . . . the church in Pergamum . . . the church in Thyatira . . . the church in Sardis . . . the church in Philadelphia . . . the church in Laodicea . . .
REVELATION 2:1, 8, 12, 18; 3:1, 7, 14
Each local church is an outcrop of the one universal church and will embody the nature of that church as the Father’s regenerate family, Christ’s ministering body, and a fellowship sustained by the Holy Spirit. The world contains self-styled churches with doubtful or false credentials (e.g., the Unitarian churches and the Mormon church, both of which deny the Trinity). Furthermore, congregations that once held the faith unambiguously have been known to lapse to the point where it is hard to know if they are churches anymore. Discernment is therefore necessary. As they opposed the papacy and separated from the Roman Catholic church, the Reformers needed to determine the marks of the true church. From Scripture, they found the answer in terms of two criteria.
Ideally, a Christian congregation will exhibit other marks of its identity alongside these minimal two. Luther specified the keys of discipline (Matt. 16:19), an authorized ministry (Acts 14:23; 20:28), public worship (Heb. 10:25), and suffering under the cross (Acts 14:22; 20:29). The Reformed churches specified a functioning system of discipline and have spoken of discipline as a third criterion or mark of the visible church (Titus 1:13; 2:15; 3:10). Charismatics and others today specify the active ministry of every member as another mark of the true church (Eph. 4:7-16).
These additional marks are not, however, essential in the way that the minimal two are. A church that lacks them is certainly deficient, but it would not be true to say that it is not a church at all.
