English Christian Web Book
TheVirginBirthofChristJGreshamMachen
J. Gresham Machen
About this book
TheVirginBirthofChristJGreshamMachen — J. Gresham Machen.
Author: J. Gresham Machen
- 29 chapters
- 665 PDF pages
- 241,811 words
- ≈ 1860 min read
- English
🔍 Search this book
Ctrl K
Table of Contents
1to the early years of the second century.
pp. 52–52 · ≈ 2 min2based upon philosophical or dogmatic prepossession, much more
pp. 52–114 · ≈ 183 min3whom they are attributed in the narrative, and produced at a time
pp. 115–467 · ≈ 1053 min4of Jesus and of related events is contained in Luke 1:5–2 (with Luke
pp. 468–473 · ≈ 19 min5show that the New Testament account of the birth of Jesus was
pp. 474–484 · ≈ 33 min6slaughter of the innocents at Bethlehem, on account of the silence of
pp. 485–485 · ≈ 3 min7disagreement with all the rest of the New Testament literature, in
pp. 486–492 · ≈ 23 min8narratives themselves destroy any belief in their trustworthiness.
pp. 493–507 · ≈ 45 min9pointing to the section 1:5–2:52 (–<T2,< ver. 3), actually excludes it,
pp. 508–508 · ≈ 3 min10º:XD"4H Dæ*@L $"F48XTH, and in 3:1, 23 are contradictory
pp. 509–509 · ≈ 3 min113:2 as if for the first time (cf. Luke 5:10), because he is defined by the
pp. 509–509 · ≈ 3 min12personal Logos, and his appearance upon the earth (the "beginning"
pp. 510–519 · ≈ 31 min13*4`, stands a number of times in Acts, but only once in the third
pp. 520–520 · ≈ 3 min14FL88Z:N® in ver. 31 from the corresponding 6"Â Æ*@× 84FV$,J º
pp. 521–521 · ≈ 3 min15those verses. In vers. 31–33 Jesus is called son of David and son of
pp. 521–521 · ≈ 3 min16obtain a good sense only if no mention of a conception by the
pp. 522–522 · ≈ 3 min17is open to objection in two respects:
pp. 522–522 · ≈ 3 min18and silent—as keeping all these things and pondering them in her
pp. 523–523 · ≈ 3 min19Gospel of Luke knows nothing of the virgin birth, except in 1:34, 35.
pp. 524–524 · ≈ 3 min20prepares for ver. 35 (very clumsily it is true); ver. 35 is to be
pp. 524–524 · ≈ 3 min21representations of the virgin birth, which simplifies matters in the
pp. 524–524 · ≈ 3 min22the virgin birth in the Gospel cannot be decided, though the former
pp. 524–534 · ≈ 34 min23birth without human father, such as that of Jesus, is by no means an
pp. 535–554 · ≈ 61 min24"B "4T<@H. P al plu syrutr cop (sah) aeth Chr9, 86 (et9, 81 JT< "
pp. 555–564 · ≈ 31 min25altogether the possibility, which he leaves open as regards the rest of
pp. 565–578 · ≈ 45 min26interesting.43 /pg. 223/ For verse 14, Gersdorf compares Lk. 15:7
pp. 579–614 · ≈ 114 min27immediately after the annunciation; it could be moved to its present
pp. 615–654 · ≈ 116 min28to the early years of the second century.
pp. 655–655 · ≈ 2 min29of the second century were based upon philosophical or dogmatic
pp. 655–665 · ≈ 29 min
pp. 52–52 · ≈ 2 min2based upon philosophical or dogmatic prepossession, much more
pp. 52–114 · ≈ 183 min3whom they are attributed in the narrative, and produced at a time
pp. 115–467 · ≈ 1053 min4of Jesus and of related events is contained in Luke 1:5–2 (with Luke
pp. 468–473 · ≈ 19 min5show that the New Testament account of the birth of Jesus was
pp. 474–484 · ≈ 33 min6slaughter of the innocents at Bethlehem, on account of the silence of
pp. 485–485 · ≈ 3 min7disagreement with all the rest of the New Testament literature, in
pp. 486–492 · ≈ 23 min8narratives themselves destroy any belief in their trustworthiness.
pp. 493–507 · ≈ 45 min9pointing to the section 1:5–2:52 (–<T2,< ver. 3), actually excludes it,
pp. 508–508 · ≈ 3 min10º:XD"4H Dæ*@L $"F48XTH, and in 3:1, 23 are contradictory
pp. 509–509 · ≈ 3 min113:2 as if for the first time (cf. Luke 5:10), because he is defined by the
pp. 509–509 · ≈ 3 min12personal Logos, and his appearance upon the earth (the "beginning"
pp. 510–519 · ≈ 31 min13*4`, stands a number of times in Acts, but only once in the third
pp. 520–520 · ≈ 3 min14FL88Z:N® in ver. 31 from the corresponding 6"Â Æ*@× 84FV$,J º
pp. 521–521 · ≈ 3 min15those verses. In vers. 31–33 Jesus is called son of David and son of
pp. 521–521 · ≈ 3 min16obtain a good sense only if no mention of a conception by the
pp. 522–522 · ≈ 3 min17is open to objection in two respects:
pp. 522–522 · ≈ 3 min18and silent—as keeping all these things and pondering them in her
pp. 523–523 · ≈ 3 min19Gospel of Luke knows nothing of the virgin birth, except in 1:34, 35.
pp. 524–524 · ≈ 3 min20prepares for ver. 35 (very clumsily it is true); ver. 35 is to be
pp. 524–524 · ≈ 3 min21representations of the virgin birth, which simplifies matters in the
pp. 524–524 · ≈ 3 min22the virgin birth in the Gospel cannot be decided, though the former
pp. 524–534 · ≈ 34 min23birth without human father, such as that of Jesus, is by no means an
pp. 535–554 · ≈ 61 min24"B "4T<@H. P al plu syrutr cop (sah) aeth Chr9, 86 (et9, 81 JT< "
pp. 555–564 · ≈ 31 min25altogether the possibility, which he leaves open as regards the rest of
pp. 565–578 · ≈ 45 min26interesting.43 /pg. 223/ For verse 14, Gersdorf compares Lk. 15:7
pp. 579–614 · ≈ 114 min27immediately after the annunciation; it could be moved to its present
pp. 615–654 · ≈ 116 min28to the early years of the second century.
pp. 655–655 · ≈ 2 min29of the second century were based upon philosophical or dogmatic
pp. 655–665 · ≈ 29 min
🔖 My bookmarks
Saved in this browser only. Tap 🔖 Bookmark while reading to add a chapter.
If you spot a typographic error from the PDF conversion, please tell us and quote the chapter title or page range.